Literature DB >> 29473575

Medical legal consultation in neurologic practice.

Jonathan H Woodcock1.   

Abstract

Responding to requests from attorneys concerning patients or providing independent consultations in the legal process may present unique challenges, particularly if special reports are needed or if there is to be testimony under oath. While the legal process is adversarial, the role of the physician consultant, whether acting as treating physician or independent expert, is not to advocate for one side or the other, or to persuade the trier of fact, but to state his or her professional opinion clearly and concisely. The American Academy of Neurology published a position statement on "Qualifications and Guidelines for the Physician Expert Witness" in 2005. Following professional practice guidelines allows the neurologist to participate in the legal process effectively and ethically. The larger the pool of neurologists available for consultation in legal matters, the more access the legal system will have to balanced expertise.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 29473575      PMCID: PMC5764530          DOI: 10.1212/01.CPJ.0000437696.56006.94

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract        ISSN: 2163-0402


  2 in total

1.  What has a decade of Daubert wrought?

Authors:  Margaret A Berger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  A cognitive scientist looks at Daubert.

Authors:  George P Lakoff
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.308

  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  Professionalism in court: The neurologist as expert witness.

Authors:  William P Cheshire; John C Hutchins
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2014-08

2.  Recognizing and reducing cognitive bias in clinical and forensic neurology.

Authors:  Saty Satya-Murti; Joseph Lockhart
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2015-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.