Literature DB >> 25278060

Three-dimensional hip cartilage quality assessment of morphology and dGEMRIC by planar maps and automated segmentation.

C Siversson1, A Akhondi-Asl2, S Bixby3, Y-J Kim4, S K Warfield5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The quantitative interpretation of hip cartilage magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been limited by the difficulty of identifying and delineating the cartilage in a three-dimensional (3D) dataset, thereby reducing its routine usage. In this paper a solution is suggested by unfolding the cartilage to planar two-dimensional (2D) maps on which both morphology and biochemical degeneration patterns can be investigated across the entire hip joint.
DESIGN: Morphological TrueFISP and biochemical delayed gadolinium enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) hip images were acquired isotropically for 15 symptomatic subjects with mild or no radiographic osteoarthritis (OA). A multi-template based label fusion technique was used to automatically segment the cartilage tissue, followed by a geometric projection algorithm to generate the planar maps. The segmentation performance was investigated through a leave-one-out study, for two different fusion methods and as a function of the number of utilized templates.
RESULTS: For each of the generated planar maps, various patterns could be seen, indicating areas of healthy and degenerated cartilage. Dice coefficients for cartilage segmentation varied from 0.76 with four templates to 0.82 with 14 templates. Regional analysis suggests even higher segmentation performance in the superior half of the cartilage.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed technique is the first of its kind to provide planar maps that enable straightforward quantitative assessment of hip cartilage morphology and dGEMRIC values. This technique may have important clinical applications for patient selection for hip preservation surgery, as well as for epidemiological studies of cartilage degeneration patterns. It is also shown that 10-15 templates are sufficient for accurate segmentation in this application.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hip; Label fusion; MRI; Osteoarthritis; Segmentation; dGEMRIC

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25278060      PMCID: PMC4404159          DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  13 in total

1.  Effects of B1 inhomogeneity correction for three-dimensional variable flip angle T1 measurements in hip dGEMRIC at 3 T and 1.5 T.

Authors:  Carl Siversson; Jenny Chan; Carl-Johan Tiderius; Tallal Charles Mamisch; Vladimir Jellus; Jonas Svensson; Young-Jo Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Radial dGEMRIC in developmental dysplasia of the hip and in femoroacetabular impingement: preliminary results.

Authors:  S E Domayer; T C Mamisch; I Kress; J Chan; Y J Kim
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 6.576

3.  Hip dGEMRIC in asymptomatic volunteers and patients with early osteoarthritis: the influence of timing after contrast injection.

Authors:  Carl J Tiderius; Rebecca Jessel; Young-Jo Kim; Deborah Burstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Multi-atlas based segmentation of brain images: atlas selection and its effect on accuracy.

Authors:  P Aljabar; R A Heckemann; A Hammers; J V Hajnal; D Rueckert
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Segmenting articular cartilage automatically using a voxel classification approach.

Authors:  Jenny Folkesson; Erik B Dam; Ole F Olsen; Paola C Pettersen; Claus Christiansen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Nondestructive imaging of human cartilage glycosaminoglycan concentration by MRI.

Authors:  A Bashir; M L Gray; J Hartke; D Burstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Automated delineation of white matter fiber tracts with a multiple region-of-interest approach.

Authors:  Ralph O Suarez; Olivier Commowick; Sanjay P Prabhu; Simon K Warfield
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Comparison of delayed gadolinium enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) using inversion recovery and fast T1 mapping sequences.

Authors:  Tallal Charles Mamisch; Marcel Dudda; Timothy Hughes; Deborah Burstein; Young-Jo Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  High resolution fast T1 mapping technique for dGEMRIC.

Authors:  Samir Sur; Tallal Charles Mamisch; Timothy Hughes; Young-Jo Kim
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Automatic segmentation and quantitative analysis of the articular cartilages from magnetic resonance images of the knee.

Authors:  Jurgen Fripp; Stuart Crozier; Simon K Warfield; Sébastien Ourselin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  9 in total

1.  7 Tesla quantitative hip MRI: T1, T2 and T2* mapping of hip cartilage in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Andrea Lazik; Jens M Theysohn; Christina Geis; Sören Johst; Mark E Ladd; Harald H Quick; Oliver Kraff
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Segmentation of joint and musculoskeletal tissue in the study of arthritis.

Authors:  Valentina Pedoia; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Shape-based acetabular cartilage segmentation: application to CT and MRI datasets.

Authors:  Pooneh R Tabrizi; Reza A Zoroofi; Futoshi Yokota; Takashi Nishii; Yoshinobu Sato
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Automatic Cartilage Segmentation for Delayed Gadolinium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Hip Joint Cartilage: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Tobias Hesper; Bernd Bittersohl; Christoph Schleich; Harish Hosalkar; Rüdiger Krauspe; Peter Krekel; Christoph Zilkens
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Automatic MRI-based Three-dimensional Models of Hip Cartilage Provide Improved Morphologic and Biochemical Analysis.

Authors:  Florian Schmaranzer; Ronja Helfenstein; Guodong Zeng; Till D Lerch; Eduardo N Novais; James D Wylie; Young-Jo Kim; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast; Guoyan Zheng
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Longitudinal study using voxel-based relaxometry: Association between cartilage T and T2 and patient reported outcome changes in hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Valentina Pedoia; Matthew C Gallo; Richard B Souza; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Planar dGEMRIC Maps May Aid Imaging Assessment of Cartilage Damage in Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Authors:  Evgeny Bulat; Sarah D Bixby; Carl Siversson; Leslie A Kalish; Simon K Warfield; Young-Jo Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Automated quantification of cartilage quality for hip treatment decision support.

Authors:  Adrian C Ruckli; Florian Schmaranzer; Malin K Meier; Till D Lerch; Simon D Steppacher; Moritz Tannast; Guodong Zeng; Jürgen Burger; Klaus A Siebenrock; Nicolas Gerber; Kate Gerber
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.421

Review 9.  Imaging of femoroacetabular impingement-current concepts.

Authors:  Christoph E Albers; Nicholas Wambeek; Markus S Hanke; Florian Schmaranzer; Gareth H Prosser; Piers J Yates
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2016-11-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.