Tobias Hesper1, Bernd Bittersohl1, Christoph Schleich2, Harish Hosalkar3,4, Rüdiger Krauspe1, Peter Krekel5, Christoph Zilkens1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Medical Faculty, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. 2. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. 3. Paradise Valley Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA. 4. Tri-city Medical Center, San Diego, CA, USA. 5. Clinical Graphics B.V., Delft, Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Automatic segmentation for biochemical cartilage evaluation holds promise for an efficient and reader-independent analysis. This pilot study aims to investigate the feasibility and to compare delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) hip joint assessment with manual segmentation of acetabular and femoral head cartilage and dGEMRIC hip joint assessment using automatic surface and volume processing software at 3 Tesla. DESIGN: Three-dimensional (3D) dGEMRIC data sets of 6 patients with hip-related pathology were assessed (1) manually including multiplanar image reformatting and regions of interest (ROI) analysis and (2) automated by using a combined surface and volume processing software. For both techniques, T1Gd values were obtained in acetabular and femoral head cartilage at 7 regions (anterior, anterior-superior, superior-anterior, superior, superior-posterior, posterior-superior, and posterior) in central and peripheral portions. Correlation between both techniques was calculated utilizing Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: A high correlation between both techniques was observed for acetabular (ρ = 0.897; P < 0.001) and femoral head (ρ = 0.894; P < 0.001) cartilage in all analyzed regions of the hip joint (ρ between 0.755 and 0.955; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Automatic cartilage segmentation with dGEMRIC assessment for hip joint cartilage evaluation seems feasible providing high to excellent correlation with manually performed ROI analysis. This technique is feasible for an objective, reader-independant and reliable assessment of biochemical cartilage status.
OBJECTIVE: Automatic segmentation for biochemical cartilage evaluation holds promise for an efficient and reader-independent analysis. This pilot study aims to investigate the feasibility and to compare delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) hip joint assessment with manual segmentation of acetabular and femoral head cartilage and dGEMRIC hip joint assessment using automatic surface and volume processing software at 3 Tesla. DESIGN: Three-dimensional (3D) dGEMRIC data sets of 6 patients with hip-related pathology were assessed (1) manually including multiplanar image reformatting and regions of interest (ROI) analysis and (2) automated by using a combined surface and volume processing software. For both techniques, T1Gd values were obtained in acetabular and femoral head cartilage at 7 regions (anterior, anterior-superior, superior-anterior, superior, superior-posterior, posterior-superior, and posterior) in central and peripheral portions. Correlation between both techniques was calculated utilizing Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: A high correlation between both techniques was observed for acetabular (ρ = 0.897; P < 0.001) and femoral head (ρ = 0.894; P < 0.001) cartilage in all analyzed regions of the hip joint (ρ between 0.755 and 0.955; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Automatic cartilage segmentation with dGEMRIC assessment for hip joint cartilage evaluation seems feasible providing high to excellent correlation with manually performed ROI analysis. This technique is feasible for an objective, reader-independant and reliable assessment of biochemical cartilage status.
Entities:
Keywords:
MRI; automatic segmentation; cartilage; dGEMRIC; hip
Authors: Christoph Zilkens; Falk Miese; Bernd Bittersohl; Marcus Jäger; Johannes Schultz; Arne Holstein; Young-Jo Kim; Michael B Millis; Tallal C Mamisch; Rüdiger Krauspe Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2010-05-26 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Vikas Khanduja; Nick Baelde; Andreas Dobbelaere; Jan Van Houcke; Hao Li; Christophe Pattyn; Emmanuel A Audenaert Journal: Int J Med Robot Date: 2016-01-08 Impact factor: 2.547
Authors: Florian Schmaranzer; Ronja Helfenstein; Guodong Zeng; Till D Lerch; Eduardo N Novais; James D Wylie; Young-Jo Kim; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast; Guoyan Zheng Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Nastassja Pamela Ewertowski; Christoph Schleich; Daniel Benjamin Abrar; Harish S Hosalkar; Bernd Bittersohl Journal: J Orthop Surg Res Date: 2022-07-30 Impact factor: 2.677
Authors: Adrian C Ruckli; Florian Schmaranzer; Malin K Meier; Till D Lerch; Simon D Steppacher; Moritz Tannast; Guodong Zeng; Jürgen Burger; Klaus A Siebenrock; Nicolas Gerber; Kate Gerber Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2022-08-17 Impact factor: 3.421
Authors: Vladimir Juras; Pavol Szomolanyi; Markus M Schreiner; Karin Unterberger; Andrea Kurekova; Benedikt Hager; Didier Laurent; Esther Raithel; Heiko Meyer; Siegfried Trattnig Journal: Cartilage Date: 2020-09-29 Impact factor: 4.634