Literature DB >> 25274578

Pan-Canadian study of mammography screening and mortality from breast cancer.

Andrew Coldman1, Norm Phillips1, Christine Wilson1, Kathleen Decker1, Anna M Chiarelli1, Jacques Brisson1, Bin Zhang1, Jennifer Payne1, Gregory Doyle1, Rukshanda Ahmad1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Screening with mammography has been shown by randomized controlled trials to reduce breast cancer mortality in women aged 40 to 74 years. Estimates from observational studies following screening implementation in different countries have produced varyied findings. We report findings for seven Canadian breast screening programs.
METHODS: Canadian breast screening programs were invited to participate in a study aimed at comparing breast cancer mortality in participants and nonparticipants. Seven of 12 programs, representing 85% of the Canadian population, participated in the study. Data were obtained from the screening programs and corresponding cancer registries on screening mammograms and breast cancer diagnoses and deaths for the period between 1990 and 2009. Standardized mortality ratios were calculated comparing observed mortality in participants to that expected based upon nonparticipant rates. A substudy using data from British Columbia women aged 35 to 44 years was conducted to assess the potential effect of self-selection participation bias. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: Data were obtained on 2796472 screening participants. The average breast cancer mortality among participants was 40% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 33% to 48%) lower than expected, with a range across provinces of 27% to 59%. Age at entry into screening did not greatly affect the magnitude of the average reduction in mortality, which varied between 35% and 44% overall. The substudy found no evidence that self-selection biased the reported mortality results, although the confidence intervals of this assessment were wide.
CONCLUSION: Participation in mammography screening programs in Canada was associated with substantially reduced breast cancer mortality.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25274578     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  54 in total

1.  Joint Statement by the Gynecologic Radiology Study Group (AGR), the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG), the German Society for Senology (DGS) and the Professional Association of Gynecologists (BVF).

Authors:  H Junkermann; D Wallwiener; R Schulz-Wendtland; C Albring
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Response to: "Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspective".

Authors:  Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Breast cancer screening panels continue to confuse the facts and inject their own biases.

Authors:  D B Kopans
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Point: Mammography screening-sticking to the science.

Authors:  M J Yaffe
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Paula B Gordon
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Controversies on Mammography Screening in the World and Bahceşehir Population-Based Organized Mammography Screening Project in Turkey.

Authors:  Vahit Özmen
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2015-10-01

7.  Recommendations on breast cancer screening and prevention in the context of implementing risk stratification: impending changes to current policies.

Authors:  J Gagnon; E Lévesque; F Borduas; J Chiquette; C Diorio; N Duchesne; M Dumais; L Eloy; W Foulkes; N Gervais; L Lalonde; B L'Espérance; S Meterissian; L Provencher; J Richard; C Savard; I Trop; N Wong; B M Knoppers; J Simard
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 8.  A review of optical breast imaging: Multi-modality systems for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Quing Zhu; Steven Poplack
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  More misinformation on breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-02

Review 10.  The wisdom trial is based on faulty reasoning and has major design and execution problems.

Authors:  Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.