Literature DB >> 26302474

Binocular rivalry: competition and inhibition in visual perception.

David Alais1.   

Abstract

When the brain is presented with ambiguous visual stimuli supporting two interpretations, perception becomes bistable and alternates over time between one interpretation and the other. This process contains elements of competition (between the rivaling percepts) as well as inhibition, as the percepts are mutually exclusive so that one is always suppressed. This review covers the most widely studied form of bistable perception-binocular rivalry. Suppression in rivalry is covered in detail, including discussion of its general and specific components, its local nature and spatial organization, techniques for quantifying it, and the role of global feedback. The competitive dynamics of rivalry are discussed within the context of the classical 'adapting reciprocal inhibition' model of rivalry and recent evidence supporting this model is discussed. This model is contrasted with alternative models based on late competition and with hybrid models. Finally, the role of attention in rivalry is examined and commonalities with other forms of bistable perception are noted. WIREs Cogn Sci 2012, 3:87-103. doi: 10.1002/wcs.151 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Year:  2011        PMID: 26302474     DOI: 10.1002/wcs.151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1939-5078


  23 in total

1.  Auditory and tactile signals combine to influence vision during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Claudia Lunghi; Maria Concetta Morrone; David Alais
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Individual peak gamma frequency predicts switch rate in perceptual rivalry.

Authors:  Jeremy D Fesi; Janine D Mendola
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Does visual attention drive the dynamics of bistable perception?

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Jan Brascamp; Duje Tadin; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Symmetry of generalized rivalry network models determines patterns of interocular grouping in four-location binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Martin Golubitsky; Yukai Zhao; Yunjiao Wang; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Ambiguous chromatic neural representations: Perceptual resolution by grouping.

Authors:  Steven K Shevell
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2019-11-07

6.  Individual differences in sensory eye dominance reflected in the dynamics of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Jocelyn L Sy; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Early Cross-modal Plasticity in Adults.

Authors:  Luca Lo Verde; Maria Concetta Morrone; Claudia Lunghi
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Seeing fruit on trees: enhanced perceptual dissimilarity from multiple ambiguous neural representations.

Authors:  Jaelyn R Peiso; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Attentional switching in humans and flies: rivalry in large and miniature brains.

Authors:  Steven Mark Miller; Trung Thanh Ngo; Bruno van Swinderen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Binocular rivalry produced by temporal frequency differences.

Authors:  David Alais; Amanda Parker
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.