Literature DB >> 25267928

Personalizing Behavioral Interventions Through Single-Patient (N-of-1) Trials.

Karina W Davidson1, James Peacock2, Ian M Kronish1, Donald Edmondson1.   

Abstract

Behavioral interventions are typically studied with the use of a conventional between-subject randomized controlled trial (RCT) design. In this design, the effect of an intervention on one group of patients is compared with the effect of a control condition on another group of patients, such that a between-subject change is tested. A between-subject design has an underlying assumption that there is a homogenous treatment effect for a behavioral intervention, drug or psychotherapy, and that the way the intervention operates in the study that will tend to operate in the same way in many other patients. We review some of the philosophical and practical problems with the use of this design when a clinician is attempting to decide on a course of behavioral treatment aimed at within-subject change in patients who are likely to have heterogeneous or unique responses to behavioral treatment. We also review the biases inherent in our current clinical practice model, which does not use any empirical data collection or design for testing if a treatment is useful, and also in the conventional between-subject personalized medicine RCT designs. We propose increased use of single-patient (also known as N-of-1) trials that employ within-subject designs, in cases where treatment response is heterogeneous-as is the case for most psychological and behavioral treatments. Limitations of such designs include that they can only be used when the treatment is potentially reversible, the patient can act as their own control, and the outcome can be measured repeatedly. Increased use of within-subject trials may address in many more instances the more clinically relevant question of how a specific patient will respond to a specific treatment, and could introduce a more harmonious scientific approach into the way we treat our patients. We have incorporated a case presentation that illustrates the complexities of applying evidence drawn from these different designs to selecting and evaluating treatments for the behavioral issues commonly faced by clinicians and patients.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25267928      PMCID: PMC4175746          DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Personal Psychol Compass        ISSN: 1751-9004


  27 in total

1.  New hope for cancer.

Authors:  M D Lemonick; A Park
Journal:  Time       Date:  2001-05-28

Review 2.  Perspectives on the Women's Health Initiative trial of hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  David A Grimes; Rogerio A Lobo
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Invitation to a dialogue between researchers and clinicians about evidence-based behavioral medicine.

Authors:  Bonnie Spring; Sherry Pagoto; Peter G Kaufmann; Evelyn P Whitlock; Russell E Glasgow; Timothy W Smith; Kimberlee J Trudeau; Karina W Davidson
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2005-10

4.  The bumpy road to evidence: why many research findings are lost in translation.

Authors:  Thomas F Lüscher
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Evidence-based treatment and practice: new opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care.

Authors:  Alan E Kazdin
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2008-04

6.  Toward rigorous idiographic research in prevention science: comparison between three analytic strategies for testing preventive intervention in very small samples.

Authors:  Ty A Ridenour; Thomas Z Pineo; Mildred M Maldonado Molina; Kristen Hassmiller Lich
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2013-06

7.  Randomized, controlled trial of oros methylphenidate once a day in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  M L Wolraich; L L Greenhill; W Pelham; J Swanson; T Wilens; D Palumbo; M Atkins; K McBurnett; O Bukstein; G August
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Long-term survival differences among low-anxious, high-anxious and repressive copers enrolled in the Montreal heart attack readjustment trial.

Authors:  Nancy Frasure-Smith; François Lespérance; Ginette Gravel; Aline Masson; Martin Juneau; Martial G Bourassa
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.312

9.  Effect of estrogen plus progestin on stroke in postmenopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller; Susan L Hendrix; Marian Limacher; Gerardo Heiss; Charles Kooperberg; Alison Baird; Theodore Kotchen; J David Curb; Henry Black; Jacques E Rossouw; Aaron Aragaki; Monika Safford; Evan Stein; Somchai Laowattana; W Jerry Mysiw
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-28       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Better population health through behavior change in adults: a call to action.

Authors:  Bonnie Spring; Judith K Ockene; Samuel S Gidding; Dariush Mozaffarian; Shirley Moore; Milagros C Rosal; Michael D Brown; Dorothea K Vafiadis; Debbie L Cohen; Lora E Burke; Donald Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  18 in total

1.  Differences among participants' response to a wellness intervention for individuals with spinal cord injuries.

Authors:  Stephanie L Silveira; Tracey A Ledoux; Craig A Johnston; Claire Kalpakjian; Daniel P O'Connor; Michael Cottingham; Ryan McGrath; Denise Tate
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.554

2.  The Influence of Daily Stress on Sedentary Behavior: Group and Person (N of 1) Level Results of a 1-Year Observational Study.

Authors:  Keith M Diaz; Anusorn Thanataveerat; Faith E Parsons; Sunmoo Yoon; Ying Kuen Cheung; Carmela Alcántara; Andrea T Duran; Ipek Ensari; David J Krupka; Joseph E Schwartz; Matthew M Burg; Karina W Davidson
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.312

3.  Using Behavioral Analytics to Increase Exercise: A Randomized N-of-1 Study.

Authors:  Sunmoo Yoon; Joseph E Schwartz; Matthew M Burg; Ian M Kronish; Carmela Alcantara; Jacob Julian; Faith Parsons; Karina W Davidson; Keith M Diaz
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Treating Hypertension in Children With n-of-1 Trials.

Authors:  Joyce P Samuel; Jon E Tyson; Charles Green; Cynthia S Bell; Claudia Pedroza; Don Molony; Joshua Samuels
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Breast cancer survivors' preferences for technology-supported exercise interventions.

Authors:  Siobhan M Phillips; David E Conroy; Sarah Kozey Keadle; Christine A Pellegrini; Gillian R Lloyd; Frank J Penedo; Bonnie Spring
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  N-of-1 Randomized Intervention Trials in Health Psychology: A Systematic Review and Methodology Critique.

Authors:  Jonathan A Shaffer; Ian M Kronish; Louise Falzon; Ying Kuen Cheung; Karina W Davidson
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2018-08-16

7.  Breast cancer survivors' preferences for social support features in technology-supported physical activity interventions: findings from a mixed methods evaluation.

Authors:  Gillian R Lloyd; Sara A Hoffman; Whitney A Welch; Danielle Blanch-Hartigan; Kara L Gavin; Alison Cottrell; Lisa Cadmus-Bertram; Bonnie Spring; Frank Penedo; Kerry S Courneya; Siobhan M Phillips
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Racial Discrimination, Sedentary Time, and Physical Activity in African Americans: Quantitative Study Combining Ecological Momentary Assessment and Accelerometers.

Authors:  Soohyun Nam; Sangchoon Jeon; Garrett Ash; Robin Whittemore; David Vlahov
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2021-06-07

9.  Racial and ethnic minority patient participation in N-of-1 trials: perspectives of healthcare providers and patients.

Authors:  Lyndonna Marrast; Joseph Conigliaro; Camille Chan; Eun Ji Kim; Joan Duer-Hefele; Michael A Diefenbach; Karina W Davidson
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.119

10.  Systematic Review of Psychosocial Smoking Cessation Interventions for People with Serious Mental Illness.

Authors:  Mark R Hawes; Kimberly B Roth; Leopoldo J Cabassa
Journal:  J Dual Diagn       Date:  2021-07-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.