Siobhan M Phillips1, David E Conroy2,3, Sarah Kozey Keadle4, Christine A Pellegrini2, Gillian R Lloyd2, Frank J Penedo5, Bonnie Spring2. 1. Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 680 N. Lake Shore Drive, Suite 1400, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. smphillips@northwestern.edu. 2. Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 680 N. Lake Shore Drive, Suite 1400, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. 3. Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA. 4. Kinesiology Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, USA. 5. Departments of Medical Social Sciences and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore breast cancer survivors' interest in and preferences for technology-supported exercise interventions. METHODS: Post-treatment survivors [n = 279; M age = 60.7 (SD = 9.7)] completed a battery of online questionnaires in August 2015. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all data. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine relationships between survivors' interest in a technology-supported exercise interventions and demographic, disease, and behavioral factors. These same factors were examined in relation to perceived effectiveness of such interventions using multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: About half (53.4%) of survivors self-reported meeting public health recommendations for physical activity. Fewer than half reported using an exercise or diet mobile app (41.2%) or owning an activity tracker (40.5%). The majority were interested in receiving remotely delivered exercise counseling (84.6%), participating in a remotely delivered exercise intervention (79.5%), and using an exercise app or website (68%). Survivors reported that the most helpful technology-supported intervention components would be an activity tracker (89.5%), personalized feedback (81.2%), and feedback on how exercise is influencing mood, fatigue, etc. (73.6%). Components rated as least helpful were social networking integration (31.2%), group competitions (33.9%), and ability to see others' progress (35.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Preferences for technology-supported exercise interventions varied among breast cancer survivors. Nonetheless, data indicate that technology-supported interventions may be feasible and acceptable. Engaging stakeholders may be important in developing and testing potential intervention components.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore breast cancer survivors' interest in and preferences for technology-supported exercise interventions. METHODS: Post-treatment survivors [n = 279; M age = 60.7 (SD = 9.7)] completed a battery of online questionnaires in August 2015. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all data. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine relationships between survivors' interest in a technology-supported exercise interventions and demographic, disease, and behavioral factors. These same factors were examined in relation to perceived effectiveness of such interventions using multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: About half (53.4%) of survivors self-reported meeting public health recommendations for physical activity. Fewer than half reported using an exercise or diet mobile app (41.2%) or owning an activity tracker (40.5%). The majority were interested in receiving remotely delivered exercise counseling (84.6%), participating in a remotely delivered exercise intervention (79.5%), and using an exercise app or website (68%). Survivors reported that the most helpful technology-supported intervention components would be an activity tracker (89.5%), personalized feedback (81.2%), and feedback on how exercise is influencing mood, fatigue, etc. (73.6%). Components rated as least helpful were social networking integration (31.2%), group competitions (33.9%), and ability to see others' progress (35.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Preferences for technology-supported exercise interventions varied among breast cancer survivors. Nonetheless, data indicate that technology-supported interventions may be feasible and acceptable. Engaging stakeholders may be important in developing and testing potential intervention components.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer survivors; Interventions; Physical activity; Physical exercise; Technology
Authors: Catherine M Sabiston; Jennifer Brunet; Jeff K Vallance; Sarkis Meterissian Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-04-21 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Lisa A Cadmus-Bertram; Bess H Marcus; Ruth E Patterson; Barbara A Parker; Brittany L Morey Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-06-10 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Shirley M Bluethmann; Sally W Vernon; Kelley Pettee Gabriel; Caitlin C Murphy; L Kay Bartholomew Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2015-01-03 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Daniel Y T Fong; Judy W C Ho; Bryant P H Hui; Antoinette M Lee; Duncan J Macfarlane; Sharron S K Leung; Ester Cerin; Wynnie Y Y Chan; Ivy P F Leung; Sharon H S Lam; Aliki J Taylor; Kar-keung Cheng Journal: BMJ Date: 2012-01-30
Authors: Lisa Cadmus-Bertram; Amye J Tevaarwerk; Mary E Sesto; Ronald Gangnon; Brittany Van Remortel; Preshita Date Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Anne M Nielsen; Whitney A Welch; Kara L Gavin; Alison M Cottrell; Payton Solk; Emily A Torre; Danielle Blanch-Hartigan; Siobhan M Phillips Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-07-31 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Kara L Gavin; Whitney A Welch; David E Conroy; Sarah Kozey-Keadle; Christine Pellegrini; Alison Cottrell; Anne Nielsen; Payton Solk; Juned Siddique; Siobhan M Phillips Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2019-03-27 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Siobhan M Phillips; Kerry S Courneya; Whitney A Welch; Kara L Gavin; Alison Cottrell; Anne Nielsen; Payton Solk; Danielle Blanch-Hartigan; David Cella; Ronald T Ackermann; Bonnie Spring; Frank Penedo Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2019-03-26 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Gillian R Lloyd; Sara A Hoffman; Whitney A Welch; Danielle Blanch-Hartigan; Kara L Gavin; Alison Cottrell; Lisa Cadmus-Bertram; Bonnie Spring; Frank Penedo; Kerry S Courneya; Siobhan M Phillips Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2020-05-20 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Siobhan M Phillips; Linda M Collins; Frank J Penedo; Kerry S Courneya; Whitney Welch; Alison Cottrell; Gillian R Lloyd; Kara Gavin; David Cella; Ronald T Ackermann; Juned Siddique; Bonnie Spring Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-01-09 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Rubén Martín-Payo; Llara Ferreras-Losilla; Xana González-Méndez; Claudia Leirós-Díaz; Andrea Martínez-Urquijo; Maria Del Mar Fernández-Álvarez Journal: Mhealth Date: 2021-01-20