Literature DB >> 31558388

Differences among participants' response to a wellness intervention for individuals with spinal cord injuries.

Stephanie L Silveira1, Tracey A Ledoux2, Craig A Johnston2, Claire Kalpakjian3, Daniel P O'Connor2, Michael Cottingham2, Ryan McGrath4, Denise Tate3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCI) often struggle with lifestyle adjustment following injury. Effective wellness interventions may aid in improving quality of life; however, treatment response heterogeneity is a concern for behavioral interventions.
OBJECTIVE: To identify differences among adults with SCI who were responders and non-responders in a wellness intervention.
METHODS: There were 29 persons with SCI who received a wellness intervention. Participants engaged in six in-person workshops over a 3-month period, led by wellness experts with peer mentors available. Individual intervention participant change was compared to the mean among control group participants target outcomes variables (i.e., satisfaction with life, self-efficacy for health practices, secondary conditions, health promoting behaviors, and perceived stress) to classify responders versus non-responders.
RESULTS: Of the 29 participants, 18 who completed the intervention were classified as responders and 11 were non-responders. The mean age was 43.2 ± 11.2 years, and years post-injury were 12.0 ± 9.8. Decision tree regression analysis for demographic variables and injury characteristics showed that single/divorced participants were more likely to not respond to the intervention (52%), compared to married participants (17%). Further, participants who were single/divorced and ≤50 years old were more likely to not respond to the intervention (62%) than those who were older (25%).
CONCLUSIONS: Single/divorced individuals with SCI may respond differently to behavioral wellness interventions than married individuals. Additionally, the effects of age on treatment response in behavioral interventions should be further examined. Identifying non-modifiable factors related to response heterogeneity may help guide the creation of tailored interventions specific to patient characteristics.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavior; Health; Quality of life; Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injuries

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31558388      PMCID: PMC6901754          DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.100842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Health J        ISSN: 1876-7583            Impact factor:   2.554


  22 in total

1.  Prediction of motivation and behavior change following health promotion: role of health beliefs, social support, and self-efficacy.

Authors:  R B Kelly; S J Zyzanski; S A Alemagno
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Effects of a Tailored Positive Psychology Intervention on Well-Being and Pain in Individuals With Chronic Pain and a Physical Disability: A Feasibility Trial.

Authors:  Rachel Müller; Kevin J Gertz; Ivan R Molton; Alexandra L Terrill; Charles H Bombardier; Dawn M Ehde; Mark P Jensen
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.442

3.  The Satisfaction With Life Scale.

Authors:  E Diener; R A Emmons; R J Larsen; S Griffin
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  1985-02

4.  Self-regulation, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and social support: social cognitive theory and nutrition behavior.

Authors:  Eileen S Anderson; Richard A Winett; Janet R Wojcik
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec

5.  The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) and the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): new methods for more potent eHealth interventions.

Authors:  Linda M Collins; Susan A Murphy; Victor Strecher
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Outcome expectations and physical activity in persons with longstanding multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Janet D Morrison; Alexa K Stuifbergen
Journal:  J Neurosci Nurs       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.230

7.  Using peer mentoring for people with spinal cord injury to enhance self-efficacy beliefs and prevent medical complications.

Authors:  Inger Ljungberg; Thilo Kroll; Alexander Libin; Samuel Gordon
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.036

8.  Health promotion by social cognitive means.

Authors:  Albert Bandura
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2004-04

9.  Predictors of health-promoting lifestyles in persons with disabilities.

Authors:  A K Stuifbergen; H A Becker
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.228

10.  Effectiveness of a Wellness Program for Individuals With Spina Bifida and Spinal Cord Injury Within an Integrated Delivery System.

Authors:  Brad E Dicianno; John Lovelace; Pamela Peele; Christopher Fassinger; Patricia Houck; Alexandra Bursic; Michael L Boninger
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.966

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.