Literature DB >> 30445595

Breast cancer survivors' preferences for social support features in technology-supported physical activity interventions: findings from a mixed methods evaluation.

Gillian R Lloyd1, Sara A Hoffman1, Whitney A Welch1, Danielle Blanch-Hartigan2, Kara L Gavin1, Alison Cottrell1, Lisa Cadmus-Bertram3, Bonnie Spring1, Frank Penedo4, Kerry S Courneya5, Siobhan M Phillips1.   

Abstract

Incorporating peer and professional social support features into remotely delivered, technology-supported physical activity interventions may increase their effectiveness. However, very little is known about survivors' preferences for potential social features. This study explored breast cancer survivors' preferences for both traditional (e.g., coaching calls and peer support) and innovative (i.e., message boards and competitions) social support features within remotely delivered, technology-supported physical activity interventions. Survivors [N = 96; Mage = 55.8 (SD = 10.2)] self-reported demographic and disease characteristics and physical activity. A subset (n = 28) completed semistructured phone interviews. Transcribed interviews were evaluated using a thematic content analysis approach and consensus review. Following interviews, the full sample self-reported preferences for social features for remotely delivered physical activity interventions via online questionnaires. Questionnaire data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Four themes emerged from interview data: (a) technology increases social connectedness; (b) interest in professional involvement/support; (c) connecting with similar survivors; and (d) apprehension regarding competitive social features. Quantitative data indicated that most survivors were interested in social features including a coach (77.1 per cent), team (66.7 per cent), and exercise buddy (57.3 per cent). Survivors endorsed sharing their activity data with their team (80.0 per cent) and buddy (76.6 per cent), but opinions were mixed regarding a progress board ranking their activity in relation to other participants' progress. Survivors were interested in using a message board to share strategies to increase activity (74.5 per cent) and motivational comments (73.4 per cent). Social features are of overall interest to breast cancer survivors, yet preferences for specific social support features varied. Engaging survivors in developing and implementing remotely delivered, technology-supported social features may enhance their effectiveness. © Society of Behavioral Medicine 2018. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Physical activity; Remotely delivered interventions; Social support; Technology

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 30445595      PMCID: PMC7237539          DOI: 10.1093/tbm/iby112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Behav Med        ISSN: 1613-9860            Impact factor:   3.046


  32 in total

Review 1.  An update of controlled physical activity trials in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca M Speck; Kerry S Courneya; Louise C Mâsse; Sue Duval; Kathryn H Schmitz
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  Home-based physical activity intervention for breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Bernardine M Pinto; Georita M Frierson; Carolyn Rabin; Joseph J Trunzo; Bess H Marcus
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Social cognitive influences on physical activity participation in long-term breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Siobhan M Phillips; Edward McAuley
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 4.  Taking the next step: a systematic review and meta-analysis of physical activity and behavior change interventions in recent post-treatment breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Shirley M Bluethmann; Sally W Vernon; Kelley Pettee Gabriel; Caitlin C Murphy; L Kay Bartholomew
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Exercise interventions for cancer survivors: a meta-analysis of quality of life outcomes.

Authors:  Rebecca A Ferrer; Tania B Huedo-Medina; Blair T Johnson; Stacey Ryan; Linda S Pescatello
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2011-02

6.  A social media-based physical activity intervention: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  David N Cavallo; Deborah F Tate; Amy V Ries; Jane D Brown; Robert F DeVellis; Alice S Ammerman
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  A qualitative exploration of barriers and motivators to physical activity participation in women treated for breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer Brunet; Samantha Taran; Shaunna Burke; Catherine M Sabiston
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.033

8.  Physical activity and survival after diagnosis of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Crystal N Holick; Polly A Newcomb; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Andrew J Bersch; Meir J Stampfer; John A Baron; Kathleen M Egan; Walter C Willett
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 9.  Why are health care interventions delivered over the internet? A systematic review of the published literature.

Authors:  Frances Griffiths; Antje Lindenmeyer; John Powell; Pam Lowe; Margaret Thorogood
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 10.  Efficacy of interventions that use apps to improve diet, physical activity and sedentary behaviour: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Schoeppe; Stephanie Alley; Wendy Van Lippevelde; Nicola A Bray; Susan L Williams; Mitch J Duncan; Corneel Vandelanotte
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 6.457

View more
  8 in total

1.  Preferences of mHealth app features for weight management among breast cancer survivors from underserved populations.

Authors:  Lisa M Quintiliani; Marva Foster; Lauren J Oshry
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Breast cancer survivors' preferences for mHealth physical activity interventions: findings from a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Siobhan M Phillips; Kerry S Courneya; Whitney A Welch; Kara L Gavin; Alison Cottrell; Anne Nielsen; Payton Solk; Danielle Blanch-Hartigan; David Cella; Ronald T Ackermann; Bonnie Spring; Frank Penedo
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Correlates of physical activity among older breast cancer survivors: Findings from the Women's Health Initiative LILAC study.

Authors:  Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Michael L Pennell; Nazmus Saquib; Michelle Naughton; Xiaochen Zhang; Aladdin H Shadyab; Candyce H Kroenke; Jennifer W Bea; Lindsay L Peterson; Tracy Crane; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 3.929

4.  A survey of technology literacy and use in cancer survivors from the Alberta Cancer Exercise program.

Authors:  Manuel Ester; Margaret L McNeely; Meghan H McDonough; S Nicole Culos-Reed
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2021-08-05

5.  Transdisciplinary Research in Energetics and Cancer early career investigator training program: first year results.

Authors:  Melinda L Irwin; Diana Lowry; Marian L Neuhouser; Jennifer Ligibel; Kathryn Schmitz; Ruth E Patterson; Graham Colditz; Fangyong Li; Linda Nebeling
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Intensity of Social Support Matters: A Latent Class Analysis to Identify Levels of Social Support Associated with Optimal Health Outcomes Among Women Living with HIV.

Authors:  Aruna Chandran; Fiona Bhondoekhan; Tracey E Wilson; Joel Milam; Mardge H Cohen; Adaora A Adimora; Adebola Adedimeji; Jennifer Cocohoba; Carrigan Parish; Marcia Holstad; Seble Kassaye; Mirjam-Colette Kempf
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2021-07-21

7.  Beliefs and interests in physical activity programs of cancer survivors and their romantic partners.

Authors:  G R Ulrich; S Callan; K W Ranby
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.062

Review 8.  Mobile Health Applications, Cancer Survivors, and Lifestyle Modification: An Integrative Review.

Authors:  Marjorie M Kelley; Jennifer Kue; Lynne Brophy; Andrea L Peabody; Randi E Foraker; Po-Yin Yen; Sharon Tucker
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.146

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.