Literature DB >> 25267634

Entrained neural oscillations in multiple frequency bands comodulate behavior.

Molly J Henry1, Björn Herrmann2, Jonas Obleser1.   

Abstract

Our sensory environment is teeming with complex rhythmic structure, to which neural oscillations can become synchronized. Neural synchronization to environmental rhythms (entrainment) is hypothesized to shape human perception, as rhythmic structure acts to temporally organize cortical excitability. In the current human electroencephalography study, we investigated how behavior is influenced by neural oscillatory dynamics when the rhythmic fluctuations in the sensory environment take on a naturalistic degree of complexity. Listeners detected near-threshold gaps in auditory stimuli that were simultaneously modulated in frequency (frequency modulation, 3.1 Hz) and amplitude (amplitude modulation, 5.075 Hz); modulation rates and types were chosen to mimic the complex rhythmic structure of natural speech. Neural oscillations were entrained by both the frequency modulation and amplitude modulation in the stimulation. Critically, listeners' target-detection accuracy depended on the specific phase-phase relationship between entrained neural oscillations in both the 3.1-Hz and 5.075-Hz frequency bands, with the best performance occurring when the respective troughs in both neural oscillations coincided. Neural-phase effects were specific to the frequency bands entrained by the rhythmic stimulation. Moreover, the degree of behavioral comodulation by neural phase in both frequency bands exceeded the degree of behavioral modulation by either frequency band alone. Our results elucidate how fluctuating excitability, within and across multiple entrained frequency bands, shapes the effective neural processing of environmental stimuli. More generally, the frequency-specific nature of behavioral comodulation effects suggests that environmental rhythms act to reduce the complexity of high-dimensional neural states.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory perception; neuroscience; psychophysics

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25267634      PMCID: PMC4205645          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1408741111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  55 in total

Review 1.  Synchronization and rhythmic processes in physiology.

Authors:  L Glass
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-03-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The pace of prosodic phrasing couples the listener's cortex to the reader's voice.

Authors:  Mathieu Bourguignon; Xavier De Tiège; Marc Op de Beeck; Noémie Ligot; Philippe Paquier; Patrick Van Bogaert; Serge Goldman; Riitta Hari; Veikko Jousmäki
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  An oscillatory hierarchy controlling neuronal excitability and stimulus processing in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Peter Lakatos; Ankoor S Shah; Kevin H Knuth; Istvan Ulbert; George Karmos; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-05-18       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Huan Luo; David Poeppel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  This is the rhythm of your eyes: the phase of ongoing electroencephalogram oscillations modulates saccadic reaction time.

Authors:  Jan Drewes; Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Tuning of the human neocortex to the temporal dynamics of attended events.

Authors:  Julien Besle; Catherine A Schevon; Ashesh D Mehta; Peter Lakatos; Robert R Goodman; Guy M McKhann; Ronald G Emerson; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Good vibrations: oscillatory phase shapes perception.

Authors:  T Neuling; S Rach; S Wagner; C H Wolters; C S Herrmann
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Human auditory cortical dynamics during perception of long acoustic sequences: phase tracking of carrier frequency by the auditory steady-state response.

Authors:  Aniruddh D Patel; Evan Balaban
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Concurrent encoding of frequency and amplitude modulation in human auditory cortex: MEG evidence.

Authors:  Huan Luo; Yadong Wang; David Poeppel; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data.

Authors:  Robert Oostenveld; Pascal Fries; Eric Maris; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-23
View more
  62 in total

1.  Theta and Gamma Bands Encode Acoustic Dynamics over Wide-Ranging Timescales.

Authors:  Xiangbin Teng; David Poeppel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Neuronal phase consistency tracks dynamic changes in acoustic spectral regularity.

Authors:  Adam M Gifford; Michael R Sperling; Ashwini Sharan; Richard J Gorniak; Ryan B Williams; Kathryn Davis; Michael J Kahana; Yale E Cohen
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 3.  A New Unifying Account of the Roles of Neuronal Entrainment.

Authors:  Peter Lakatos; Joachim Gross; Gregor Thut
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Rhythmic auditory cortex activity at multiple timescales shapes stimulus-response gain and background firing.

Authors:  Christoph Kayser; Caroline Wilson; Houman Safaai; Shuzo Sakata; Stefano Panzeri
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Statistical context shapes stimulus-specific adaptation in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Björn Herrmann; Molly J Henry; Elisa Kim Fromboluti; J Devin McAuley; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Prefrontal cortex modulates posterior alpha oscillations during top-down guided visual perception.

Authors:  Randolph F Helfrich; Melody Huang; Guy Wilson; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Consensus paper: Decoding the Contributions of the Cerebellum as a Time Machine. From Neurons to Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Martin Bareš; Richard Apps; Laura Avanzino; Assaf Breska; Egidio D'Angelo; Pavel Filip; Marcus Gerwig; Richard B Ivry; Charlotte L Lawrenson; Elan D Louis; Nicholas A Lusk; Mario Manto; Warren H Meck; Hiroshi Mitoma; Elijah A Petter
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  Neural mechanisms of rhythm-based temporal prediction: Delta phase-locking reflects temporal predictability but not rhythmic entrainment.

Authors:  Assaf Breska; Leon Y Deouell
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Neural Mechanisms of Sustained Attention Are Rhythmic.

Authors:  Randolph F Helfrich; Ian C Fiebelkorn; Sara M Szczepanski; Jack J Lin; Josef Parvizi; Robert T Knight; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Dynamic Control of Synchronous Activity in Networks of Spiking Neurons.

Authors:  Axel Hutt; Andreas Mierau; Jérémie Lefebvre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.