Literature DB >> 21430168

This is the rhythm of your eyes: the phase of ongoing electroencephalogram oscillations modulates saccadic reaction time.

Jan Drewes1, Rufin VanRullen.   

Abstract

Motor reaction times in humans are highly variable from one trial to the next, even for simple and automatic tasks, such as shifting your gaze to a suddenly appearing target. Although classic models of reaction time generation consider this variability to reflect intrinsic noise, some portion of it could also be attributed to ongoing neuronal processes. For example, variations of alpha rhythm frequency (8-12 Hz) across individuals, or alpha amplitude across trials, have been related previously to manual reaction time variability. Here we investigate the trial-by-trial influence of oscillatory phase, a dynamic marker of ongoing activity, on saccadic reaction time in three paradigms of increasing cognitive demand (simple reaction time, choice reaction time, and visual discrimination tasks). The phase of ongoing prestimulus activity in the high alpha/low beta range (11-17 Hz) at frontocentral locations was strongly associated with saccadic response latencies. This relation, present in all three paradigms, peaked for phases recorded ∼50 ms before fixation point offset and 250 ms before target onset. Reaction times in the most demanding discrimination task fell into two distinct modes reflecting a fast but inaccurate strategy or a slow and efficient one. The phase effect was markedly stronger in the group of subjects using the faster strategy. We conclude that periodic fluctuations of electrical activity attributable to neuronal oscillations can modulate the efficiency of the oculomotor system on a rapid timescale; however, this relation may be obscured when cognitive load also adds a significant contribution to response time variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21430168      PMCID: PMC6622921          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4795-10.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  45 in total

Review 1.  Neural selection and control of visually guided eye movements.

Authors:  J D Schall; K G Thompson
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Search efficiency but not response interference affects visual selection in frontal eye field.

Authors:  T Sato; A Murthy; K G Thompson; J D Schall
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  The role of the superior colliculus in saccade initiation: a study of express saccades and the gap effect.

Authors:  D Sparks; W H Rohrer; Y Zhang
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Is perception discrete or continuous?

Authors:  Rufin VanRullen; Christof Koch
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Relationship between reaction time and electroencephalographic alpha phase.

Authors:  E CALLAWAY; C L YEAGER
Journal:  Science       Date:  1960-12-09       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  THE RELATION OF RESPONSE-TIME VARIABILITY TO AGE AND THE INFLUENCE OF BRAIN WAVE FREQUENCY.

Authors:  W W SURWILLO
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1963-12

7.  The relation of simple response time to brain-wave frequency and the effects of age.

Authors:  W W SURWILLO
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1963-02

8.  Periodicity in reaction time.

Authors:  P H VENABLES
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1960-02

9.  Relation of brain and tremor rhythms to visual reaction time.

Authors:  R W LANSING
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1957-08

10.  Visual reaction time and the alpha-rhythm, an investigation of a scanning hypothesis.

Authors:  E G WALSH
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1952-12       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  50 in total

1.  Cortical localization of phase and amplitude dynamics predicting access to somatosensory awareness.

Authors:  Jonni Hirvonen; Satu Palva
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Pre-cue fronto-occipital alpha phase and distributed cortical oscillations predict failures of cognitive control.

Authors:  Jordan P Hamm; Kara A Dyckman; Jennifer E McDowell; Brett A Clementz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  The challenge of understanding the brain: where we stand in 2015.

Authors:  John Lisman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Activity of primate V1 neurons during the gap saccade task.

Authors:  Kayeon Kim; Choongkil Lee
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Short-latency allocentric control of saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Mrinmoy Chakrabarty; Tamami Nakano; Shigeru Kitazawa
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Ready, set, reset: stimulus-locked periodicity in behavioral performance demonstrates the consequences of cross-sensory phase reset.

Authors:  Ian C Fiebelkorn; John J Foxe; John S Butler; Manuel R Mercier; Adam C Snyder; Sophie Molholm
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Frequency modulation entrains slow neural oscillations and optimizes human listening behavior.

Authors:  Molly J Henry; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  On the cyclic nature of perception in vision versus audition.

Authors:  Rufin VanRullen; Benedikt Zoefel; Barkin Ilhan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Two-phase model of the basal ganglia: implications for discontinuous control of the motor system.

Authors:  John Lisman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 10.  The θ-γ neural code.

Authors:  John E Lisman; Ole Jensen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.