Literature DB >> 25652920

Statistical context shapes stimulus-specific adaptation in human auditory cortex.

Björn Herrmann1, Molly J Henry2, Elisa Kim Fromboluti3, J Devin McAuley3, Jonas Obleser2.   

Abstract

Stimulus-specific adaptation is the phenomenon whereby neural response magnitude decreases with repeated stimulation. Inconsistencies between recent nonhuman animal recordings and computational modeling suggest dynamic influences on stimulus-specific adaptation. The present human electroencephalography (EEG) study investigates the potential role of statistical context in dynamically modulating stimulus-specific adaptation by examining the auditory cortex-generated N1 and P2 components. As in previous studies of stimulus-specific adaptation, listeners were presented with oddball sequences in which the presentation of a repeated tone was infrequently interrupted by rare spectral changes taking on three different magnitudes. Critically, the statistical context varied with respect to the probability of small versus large spectral changes within oddball sequences (half of the time a small change was most probable; in the other half a large change was most probable). We observed larger N1 and P2 amplitudes (i.e., release from adaptation) for all spectral changes in the small-change compared with the large-change statistical context. The increase in response magnitude also held for responses to tones presented with high probability, indicating that statistical adaptation can overrule stimulus probability per se in its influence on neural responses. Computational modeling showed that the degree of coadaptation in auditory cortex changed depending on the statistical context, which in turn affected stimulus-specific adaptation. Thus the present data demonstrate that stimulus-specific adaptation in human auditory cortex critically depends on statistical context. Finally, the present results challenge the implicit assumption of stationarity of neural response magnitudes that governs the practice of isolating established deviant-detection responses such as the mismatch negativity.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory processing; event-related potentials; stimulus statistics; stimulus-specific adaptation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25652920      PMCID: PMC4416562          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00634.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  88 in total

1.  The effects of interstimulus interval on sensory gating and on preattentive auditory memory in the oddball paradigm. Can magnitude of the sensory gating affect preattentive auditory comparison process?

Authors:  M Numan Ermutlu; Tamer Demiralp; Sacit Karamürsel
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2007-01-02       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 2.  Short-term plasticity in auditory cognition.

Authors:  Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Jyrki Ahveninen; John W Belliveau; Tommi Raij; Mikko Sams
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 3.  Hearing in noisy environments: noise invariance and contrast gain control.

Authors:  Ben D B Willmore; James E Cooke; Andrew J King
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution.

Authors:  A J Bell; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.026

5.  Interpreting event-related brain potential (ERP) distributions: implications of baseline potentials and variability with application to amplitude normalization by vector scaling.

Authors:  Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 3.251

6.  Differential effects of excitatory and inhibitory plasticity on synaptically driven neuronal input-output functions.

Authors:  Tiago P Carvalho; Dean V Buonomano
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Frequency-specific adaptation in human auditory cortex depends on the spectral variance in the acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Björn Herrmann; Molly J Henry; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Processing of complex distracting sounds in school-aged children and adults: evidence from EEG and MEG data.

Authors:  Philipp Ruhnau; Björn Herrmann; Burkhard Maess; Jens Brauer; Angela D Friederici; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-21

9.  Mechanisms of adaptation in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Cornelis P Lanting; Paul M Briley; Christian J Sumner; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Adaptation maintains population homeostasis in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Andrea Benucci; Aman B Saleem; Matteo Carandini
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  16 in total

1.  [Effects of auditory response patterns on stimulus-specific adaptation of inferior colliculus neurons in awake mice].

Authors:  Changbao Song; Jinxing Wei; Lv Li; Zhongju Xiao
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-01-30

2.  Familiar But Unexpected: Effects of Sound Context Statistics on Auditory Responses in the Songbird Forebrain.

Authors:  Kai Lu; David S Vicario
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Sensitivity of rat inferior colliculus neurons to frequency distributions.

Authors:  Björn Herrmann; Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Emily X Han; Jonas Obleser; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Aging Affects Adaptation to Sound-Level Statistics in Human Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Björn Herrmann; Burkhard Maess; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Electrophysiological correlates of perceptual prediction error are attenuated in dyslexia.

Authors:  Sara D Beach; Sung-Joo Lim; Carlos Cardenas-Iniguez; Marianna D Eddy; John D E Gabrieli; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Corticofugal regulation of predictive coding.

Authors:  Alexandria M H Lesicko; Christopher F Angeloni; Jennifer M Blackwell; Mariella De Biasi; Maria N Geffen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 8.713

7.  Talker discontinuity disrupts attention to speech: Evidence from EEG and pupillometry.

Authors:  Sung-Joo Lim; Yaminah D Carter; J Michelle Njoroge; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 2.781

8.  Computational framework for investigating predictive processing in auditory perception.

Authors:  Benjamin Skerritt-Davis; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 2.987

9.  Unpredicted Pitch Modulates Beta Oscillatory Power during Rhythmic Entrainment to a Tone Sequence.

Authors:  Andrew Chang; Dan J Bosnyak; Laurel J Trainor
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-09

10.  Dyslexics' faster decay of implicit memory for sounds and words is manifested in their shorter neural adaptation.

Authors:  Sagi Jaffe-Dax; Or Frenkel; Merav Ahissar
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.