Literature DB >> 10444906

Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation.

J C Sedivy1, M K Tanenhaus, C G Chambers, G N Carlson.   

Abstract

While much work has been done investigating the role of context in the incremental processing of syntactic indeterminacies, relatively little is known about online semantic interpretation. The experiments in this article made use of the eye-tracking paradigm with spoken language and visual contexts in order to examine how, and when listeners make use of contextually-defined contrast in interpreting simple prenominal adjectives. Experiment 1 focused on intersective adjectives. Experiment 1A provided further evidence that intersective adjectives are processed incrementally. Experiment 1B compared response times to follow instructions such as 'Pick up the blue comb' under conditions where there were two blue objects (e.g. a blue pen and a blue comb), but only one of these objects had a contrasting member in the display. Responses were faster to objects with a contrasting member, establishing that the listeners initially assume a contrastive interpretation for intersective adjectives. Experiments 2 and 3 focused on vague scalar adjectives examining the time course with which listeners establish contrast for scalar adjectives such as tall using information provided by the head noun (e.g. glass) and information provided by the visual context. Use of head-based information was examined by manipulating the typicality of the target object (e.g. whether it was a good or poor example of a tall glass. Use of context-dependent contrast was examined by either having only a single glass in the display (the no contrast condition) or a contrasting object (e.g. a smaller glass). The pattern of results indicated that listeners interpreted the scalar adjective incrementally taking into account context-specific contrast prior to encountering the head. Moreover, the presence of a contrasting object, sharply reduced, and in some conditions completely eliminated, typicality effects. The results suggest a language processing system in which semantic interpretation, as well as syntactic processing, is conducted incrementally, with early integration of contextual information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10444906     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00025-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  78 in total

1.  Eye movements and lexical access in spoken-language comprehension: evaluating a linking hypothesis between fixations and linguistic processing.

Authors:  M K Tanenhaus; J S Magnuson; D Dahan; C Chambers
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2000-11

2.  Pragmatic versus form-based accounts of referential contrast: evidence for effects of informativity expectations.

Authors:  Julie C Sedivy
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2003-01

3.  Integration of syntactic and semantic information in predictive processing: cross-linguistic evidence from German and English.

Authors:  Yuki Kamide; Christoph Scheepers; Gerry T M Altmann
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2003-01

4.  Readers' sensitivity to linguistic cues in narratives: how salience influences anaphor resolution.

Authors:  Celia M Klin; Kristin M Weingartner; Alexandria E Guzmán; William H Levine
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-04

5.  Situation-evoking stimuli, domain of reference, and the incremental interpretation of lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  Hoang Vu; George Kellas; Eric Petersen; Kim Metcalf
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-12

6.  Who do you love, your mother or your horse? An event-related brain potential analysis of tone processing in Mandarin Chinese.

Authors:  Sarah Brown-Schmidt; Enriqueta Canseco-Gonzalez
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2004-03

Review 7.  On the mental representations originating during the interaction between language and vision.

Authors:  Ramesh Kumar Mishra; Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-05-06

8.  Good-enough language processing: evidence from sentence-video matching.

Authors:  Gaurav Kharkwal; Karin Stromswold
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2014-02

9.  The process of spoken word recognition in the face of signal degradation.

Authors:  Ashley Farris-Trimble; Bob McMurray; Nicole Cigrand; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Lexical activation during sentence comprehension in adolescents with history of Specific Language Impairment.

Authors:  Arielle Borovsky; Erin Burns; Jeffrey L Elman; Julia L Evans
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.