Literature DB >> 25265037

Correlation of respirator fit measured on human subjects and a static advanced headform.

Michael S Bergman1, Xinjian He, Michael E Joseph, Ziqing Zhuang, Brian K Heimbuch, Ronald E Shaffer, Melanie Choe, Joseph D Wander.   

Abstract

This study assessed the correlation of N95 filtering facepiece respirator (FFR) fit between a Static Advanced Headform (StAH) and 10 human test subjects. Quantitative fit evaluations were performed on test subjects who made three visits to the laboratory. On each visit, one fit evaluation was performed on eight different FFRs of various model/size variations. Additionally, subject breathing patterns were recorded. Each fit evaluation comprised three two-minute exercises: "Normal Breathing," "Deep Breathing," and again "Normal Breathing." The overall test fit factors (FF) for human tests were recorded. The same respirator samples were later mounted on the StAH and the overall test manikin fit factors (MFF) were assessed utilizing the recorded human breathing patterns. Linear regression was performed on the mean log10-transformed FF and MFF values to assess the relationship between the values obtained from humans and the StAH. This is the first study to report a positive correlation of respirator fit between a headform and test subjects. The linear regression by respirator resulted in R(2) = 0.95, indicating a strong linear correlation between FF and MFF. For all respirators the geometric mean (GM) FF values were consistently higher than those of the GM MFF. For 50% of respirators, GM FF and GM MFF values were significantly different between humans and the StAH. For data grouped by subject/respirator combinations, the linear regression resulted in R(2) = 0.49. A weaker correlation (R(2) = 0.11) was found using only data paired by subject/respirator combination where both the test subject and StAH had passed a real-time leak check before performing the fit evaluation. For six respirators, the difference in passing rates between the StAH and humans was < 20%, while two respirators showed a difference of 29% and 43%. For data by test subject, GM FF and GM MFF values were significantly different for 40% of the subjects. Overall, the advanced headform system has potential for assessing fit for some N95 FFR model/sizes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  N95; advanced headform; filtering facepiece respirator; fit test

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25265037      PMCID: PMC4470384          DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2014.957832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  9 in total

1.  Respiratory protection--OSHA. Final rule; request for comment on paperwork requirements.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1998-01-08

2.  Correlation between quantitative fit factors and workplace protection factors measured in actual workplace environments at a steel foundry.

Authors:  Ziqing Zhuang; Christopher C Coffey; Paul A Jensen; Donald L Campbell; Robert B Lawrence; Warren R Myers
Journal:  AIHA J (Fairfax, Va)       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

3.  Analysis of forces generated by n95 filtering facepiece respirator tethering devices: a pilot study.

Authors:  Raymond Roberge; George Niezgoda; Stacey Benson
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Fit for purpose? The role of fit testing in respiratory protection.

Authors:  Mike Clayton; Nick Vaughan
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2005-09-07

5.  New respirator fit test panels representing the current U.S. civilian work force.

Authors:  Ziqing Zhuang; Bruce Bradtmiller; Ronald E Shaffer
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Comparison of six respirator fit-test methods with an actual measurement of exposure in a simulated health care environment: Part II--Method comparison testing.

Authors:  C C Coffey; D L Campbell; W R Myers; Z Zhuang
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1998-12

7.  Evaluation of particulate filtering respirators using inward leakage (IL) or total inward leakage (TIL) testing--Korean experience.

Authors:  Don-Hee Han; Jinheon Lee
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2005-08-26

8.  Development of an advanced respirator fit-test headform.

Authors:  Michael S Bergman; Ziqing Zhuang; David Hanson; Brian K Heimbuch; Michael J McDonald; Andrew J Palmiero; Ronald E Shaffer; Delbert Harnish; Michael Husband; Joseph D Wander
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  Performance of an N95 filtering facepiece particulate respirator and a surgical mask during human breathing: two pathways for particle penetration.

Authors:  Sergey A Grinshpun; Hiroki Haruta; Robert M Eninger; Tiina Reponen; Roy T McKay; Shu-An Lee
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.155

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  A comparison of performance metrics for cloth masks as source control devices for simulated cough and exhalation aerosols.

Authors:  William G Lindsley; Francoise M Blachere; Donald H Beezhold; Brandon F Law; Raymond C Derk; Justin M Hettick; Karen Woodfork; William T Goldsmith; James R Harris; Matthew G Duling; Brenda Boutin; Timothy Nurkiewicz; Theresa Boots; Jayme Coyle; John D Noti
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 4.809

2.  Comment on Scheepers et al. Comparative Performance Testing of Respirator versus Surgical Mask Using a Water Droplet Spray Model. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1599.

Authors:  Andrew Viner; Stewart Ayrey
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Development of a Manikin-Based Performance Evaluation Method for Loose-Fitting Powered Air-Purifying Respirators.

Authors:  Mike Bergman; Rohan Basu; Zhipeng Lei; George Niezgoda; Ziqing Zhuang
Journal:  J Int Soc Respir Prot       Date:  2017

4.  Patient-worn endoscopy mask to protect against viral transmission.

Authors:  Andrew M Vahabzadeh-Hagh; Shiv H Patel; Joshua A Stramiello; Philip A Weissbrod
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-12-09

Review 5.  What We Are Learning from COVID-19 for Respiratory Protection: Contemporary and Emerging Issues.

Authors:  Rui Li; Mengying Zhang; Yulin Wu; Peixin Tang; Gang Sun; Liwen Wang; Sumit Mandal; Lizhi Wang; James Lang; Alberto Passalacqua; Shankar Subramaniam; Guowen Song
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 4.329

6.  A comparison of performance metrics for cloth face masks as source control devices for simulated cough and exhalation aerosols.

Authors:  William G Lindsley; Francoise M Blachere; Donald H Beezhold; Brandon F Law; Raymond C Derk; Justin M Hettick; Karen Woodfork; William T Goldsmith; James R Harris; Matthew G Duling; Brenda Boutin; Timothy Nurkiewicz; John D Noti
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2021-02-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.