Literature DB >> 25261321

To what extent can linear finite element models of human femora predict failure under stance and fall loading configurations?

Enrico Schileo1, Luca Balistreri2, Lorenzo Grassi2, Luca Cristofolini3, Fulvia Taddei2.   

Abstract

Proximal femur strength estimates from computed tomography (CT)-based finite element (FE) models are finding clinical application. Published models reached a high in-vitro accuracy, yet many of them rely on nonlinear methodologies or internal best-fitting of parameters. The aim of the present study is to verify to what extent a linear FE modelling procedure, fully based on independently determined parameters, can predict the failure characteristics of the proximal femur in stance and sideways fall loading configurations. Fourteen fresh-frozen cadaver femora were CT-scanned. Seven femora were tested to failure in stance loading conditions, and seven in fall. Fracture was monitored with high-speed videos. Linear FE models were built from CT images according to a procedure already validated in the prediction of strains. An asymmetric maximum principal strain criterion (0.73% tensile, 1.04% compressive limit) was used to define a node-based risk factor (RF). FE-predicted failure load, mode (tensile/compressive) and location were determined from the first node reaching RF=1. FE-predicted and measured failure loads were highly correlated (R(2)=0.89, SEE=814N). In all specimens, FE models correctly identified the failure mode (tensile in stance, compressive in fall) and the femoral region where fracture started (supero-lateral neck aspect). The location of failure onset was accurately predicted in eight specimens. In summary, a simple FE model, adaptable in the future to multiple loads (e.g. including muscles), was highly correlated with experimental failure in two loading conditions on specimens ranging from normal to osteoporotic. Thus, it can be suitable for use in clinical studies.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone biomechanics; Computed tomography; Proximal femur; Subject-specific finite element models; Validation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25261321     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.08.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  26 in total

1.  Opportunistic CT screening predicts individuals at risk of major osteoporotic fracture.

Authors:  A S Michalski; B A Besler; L A Burt; S K Boyd
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Chantal M J de Bakker; Wei-Ju Tseng; Yihan Li; Hongbo Zhao; X Sherry Liu
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 3.  Patient-Specific Bone Multiscale Modelling, Fracture Simulation and Risk Analysis-A Survey.

Authors:  Amadeus C S de Alcântara; Israel Assis; Daniel Prada; Konrad Mehle; Stefan Schwan; Lucia Costa-Paiva; Munir S Skaf; Luiz C Wrobel; Paulo Sollero
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Method and Instrumented Fixture for Femoral Fracture Testing in a Sideways Fall-on-the-Hip Position.

Authors:  Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Asghar Rezaei; Timothy Rossman; Susheil Uthamaraj; Rachel Entwistle; Sean McEligot; Vincent Lambert; Hugo Giambini; Iwona Jasiuk; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Spatial distribution of hip cortical thickness in postmenopausal women with different osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Ming Ling; Xianlong Li; Yueyang Xu; Yongqian Fan
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 2.617

6.  Coronal shear fractures of the femoral neck: a comparison with basicervical fractures.

Authors:  Yasuaki Yamakawa; Norio Yamamoto; Yosuke Tomita; Tomoyuki Noda; Tomoo Inoue; Toshiyuki Matsumoto; Keisuke Kawasaki; Toshifumi Ozaki
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  The Influence of Static Load and Sideways Impact Fall on Extramedullary Bone Plates Used to Treat Intertrochanteric Femoral Fracture: A Preclinical Strength Assessment.

Authors:  Pratik Nag; Bhaskar Borgohain; Kashif Akhtar Ahmed; Pranjal Phukan; Neeraj Kumar; Alireza Borjali; Kartik Mangudi Varadarajan; Souptick Chanda
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 4.219

8.  Left-right differences in the proximal femur's strength of post-menopausal women: a multicentric finite element study.

Authors:  F Taddei; C Falcinelli; L Balistreri; P Henys; F Baruffaldi; S Sigurdsson; V Gudnason; T B Harris; R Dietzel; G Armbrecht; S Boutroy; E Schileo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Perspectives on the non-invasive evaluation of femoral strength in the assessment of hip fracture risk.

Authors:  M L Bouxsein; P Zysset; C C Glüer; M McClung; E Biver; D D Pierroz; S L Ferrari
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Investigation of femur fracture potential in common pediatric falls using finite element analysis.

Authors:  Keyonna McKinsey; Angela Thompson; Gina Bertocci
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 1.763

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.