Literature DB >> 35821164

The Influence of Static Load and Sideways Impact Fall on Extramedullary Bone Plates Used to Treat Intertrochanteric Femoral Fracture: A Preclinical Strength Assessment.

Pratik Nag1, Bhaskar Borgohain2, Kashif Akhtar Ahmed2, Pranjal Phukan3, Neeraj Kumar1, Alireza Borjali4,5, Kartik Mangudi Varadarajan4,5, Souptick Chanda6.   

Abstract

Hip fracture accounts for a large number of hospitalizations, thereby causing substantial economic burden. Majority (> 90%) of all hip fractures are associated to sideways fall. Studies on sideways fall usually involve loading at quasi-static or at constant displacement rate, which neglects the physics of actual fall. Understanding femur resonance frequency and associated mode shapes excited by dynamic loads is also critical. Two commercial extramedullary implants, proximal femoral locking plate (PFLP) and variable angle dynamic hip screw (VA-DHS), were chosen to carry out the preclinical assessments on a simulated Evans-I type intertrochanteric fracture. In this study, we hypothesized that the behavior of the implant depends on the loading types-axial static and transverse impact-and a rigid implanted construct will absorb less impact energy for sideways fall. The in silico models were validated using experimental measurements of full-field strain data obtained from a 2D digital image correlation (DIC) study. Under peak axial load of 3 kN, PFLP construct predicted greater axial stiffness (1.07 kN/mm) as opposed to VA-DHS (0.85 kN/mm), although the former predicted slightly higher proximal stress shielding. Further, with greater mode 2 frequency, PFLP predicted improved performance in resisting bending due to sideways fall as compared to the other implant. Overall, the PFLP implanted femur predicted the least propensity to adverse stress intensities, suggesting better structural rigidity and higher capacity in protecting the fractured femur against fall.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Biomedical Engineering Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Digital image correlation; Extramedullary implant; Finite element analysis; Hip fracture; Intertrochanteric fracture

Year:  2022        PMID: 35821164     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-022-03013-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   4.219


  55 in total

1.  A biomechanical study of femoral neck fracture fixation with the VHS Vari-Angle Hip Fixation System.

Authors:  Solomon H Chaim; Debi P Mukherjee; Alan L Ogden; Raymond H Mayeux; Kalia K Sadasivan; James A Albright
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2002-01

Review 2.  Fractures in brief: intertrochanteric hip fractures.

Authors:  Jaimo Ahn; Joseph Bernstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Pitfalls and limits of locking plates.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Bel
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 2.256

4.  A standard test for laboratory animal bone.

Authors:  A H Burstein; V H Frankel
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Effects of loading rate on strength of the proximal femur.

Authors:  A C Courtney; E F Wachtel; E R Myers; W C Hayes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Impact loading history modulates hip fracture load and location: A finite element simulation study of the proximal femur in female athletes.

Authors:  Shinya Abe; Nathaniel Narra; Riku Nikander; Jari Hyttinen; Reijo Kouhia; Harri Sievänen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Osteoporotic hip fracture prediction: is T-score based criterion enough? A Hip Structural Analysis based model.

Authors:  Alessandra Aldieri; Mara Terzini; Giangiacomo Osella; Adriano M Priola; Alberto Angeli; Andrea Veltri; Alberto Audenino; Cristina Bignardi
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Outcome of pertrochantric fracture of the femur treated with proximal femoral locking compression plate.

Authors:  P K Chalise; A K Mishra; S B Shah; V Adhikari; R P Singh
Journal:  Nepal Med Coll J       Date:  2012-12

9.  Vertically oriented femoral neck fractures: mechanical analysis of four fixation techniques.

Authors:  Arash Aminian; Fan Gao; Wasyl W Fedoriw; Li-Qun Zhang; David M Kalainov; Bradley R Merk
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.512

10.  A biomechanical comparison of locked plate fixation with percutaneous insertion capability versus the angled blade plate in a subtrochanteric fracture gap model.

Authors:  Brett D Crist; Afshin Khalafi; Scott J Hazelwood; Mark A Lee
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.512

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.