Literature DB >> 25258471

The time-course of feature interference in agreement comprehension: Multiple mechanisms and asymmetrical attraction.

Darren Tanner1, Janet Nicol2, Laurel Brehm3.   

Abstract

Attraction interference in language comprehension and production may be as a result of common or different processes. In the present paper, we investigate attraction interference during language comprehension, focusing on the contexts in which interference arises and the time-course of these effects. Using evidence from event-related brain potentials (ERPs) and sentence judgment times, we show that agreement attraction in comprehension is best explained as morphosyntactic interference during memory retrieval. This stands in contrast to attraction as a message-level process involving the representation of the subject NP's number features, which is a strong contributor to attraction in production. We thus argue that the cognitive antecedents of agreement attraction in comprehension are non-identical with those of attraction in production, and moreover, that attraction in comprehension is primarily a consequence of similarity-based interference in cue-based memory retrieval processes. We suggest that mechanisms responsible for attraction during language comprehension are a subset of those involved in language production.

Entities:  

Keywords:  P600; agreement; language comprehension; morphosyntactic processing; retrieval interference

Year:  2014        PMID: 25258471      PMCID: PMC4170797          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  67 in total

1.  Sentence comprehension is mediated by content-addressable memory structures.

Authors:  B McElree
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2000-03

2.  Brain potentials elicited by prose-embedded linguistic anomalies.

Authors:  Lee Osterhout; Mark D Allen; Judith McLaughlin; Kayo Inoue
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-12

Review 3.  Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components.

Authors:  Cyma Van Petten; Barbara J Luka
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.997

4.  Early occipital sensitivity to syntactic category is based on form typicality.

Authors:  Suzanne Dikker; Hugh Rabagliati; Thomas A Farmer; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-04-13

5.  Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times.

Authors:  Jos J A Van Berkum; Colin M Brown; Pienie Zwitserlood; Valesca Kooijman; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Expectation-based syntactic comprehension.

Authors:  Roger Levy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-07-30

7.  Response time distributional evidence for distinct varieties of number attraction.

Authors:  Adrian Staub
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-12-08

8.  Separating hierarchical relations and word order in language production: is proximity concord syntactic or linear?

Authors:  G Vigliocco; J Nicol
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-08

9.  What counts in grammatical number agreement?

Authors:  Laurel Brehm; Kathryn Bock
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-05-13

10.  Effects of clausal structure on subject-verb agreement errors.

Authors:  J L Nicol
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1995-11
View more
  19 in total

1.  How inappropriate high-pass filters can produce artifactual effects and incorrect conclusions in ERP studies of language and cognition.

Authors:  Darren Tanner; Kara Morgan-Short; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Cues, quantification, and agreement in language comprehension.

Authors:  Darren Tanner; Nyssa Z Bulkes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

3.  Input Training Matters in L2 Syntactic Representation Entrenchment: Evidence from a Follow-Up ERP Study.

Authors:  Taiping Deng; Baoguo Chen
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2019-06

4.  Hierarchical structure and memory mechanisms in agreement attraction.

Authors:  Julie Franck; Matthew Wagers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Role of Case Syncretism in Agreement Attraction: A Comprehension Study.

Authors:  Natalia Slioussar; Varvara Magomedova; Polina Makarova
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-06

6.  Language Processing as Cue Integration: Grounding the Psychology of Language in Perception and Neurophysiology.

Authors:  Andrea E Martin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-16

7.  Effects of Grammaticality and Morphological Complexity on the P600 Event-Related Potential Component.

Authors:  Alison S Mehravari; Darren Tanner; Emma K Wampler; Geoffrey D Valentine; Lee Osterhout
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Interference in the processing of adjunct control.

Authors:  Dan Parker; Sol Lago; Colin Phillips
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-08

9.  Task-dependency and structure-dependency in number interference effects in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Julie Franck; Saveria Colonna; Luigi Rizzi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-10

10.  Representing number in the real-time processing of agreement: self-paced reading evidence from Arabic.

Authors:  Matthew A Tucker; Ali Idrissi; Diogo Almeida
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.