Literature DB >> 25251591

Descending motor pathways and cortical physiology after spinal cord injury assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation: a systematic review.

Raffaele Nardone1, Yvonne Höller2, Francesco Brigo3, Andrea Orioli4, Frediano Tezzon4, Kerstin Schwenker2, Monica Christova5, Stefan Golaszewski6, Eugen Trinka2.   

Abstract

We performed here a systematic review of the studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a research and clinical tool in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by TMS represent a highly accurate diagnostic test that can supplement clinical examination and neuroimaging findings in the assessment of SCI functional level. MEPs allows to monitor the changes in motor function and evaluate the effects of the different therapeutic approaches. Moreover, TMS represents a useful non-invasive approach for studying cortical physiology, and may be helpful in elucidating the pathophysiological mechanisms of brain reorganization after SCI. Measures of motor cortex reactivity, e.g., the short interval intracortical inhibition and the cortical silent period, seem to point to an increased cortical excitability. However, the results of TMS studies are sometimes contradictory or divergent, and should be replicated in a larger sample of subjects. Understanding the functional changes at brain level and defining their effects on clinical outcome is of crucial importance for development of evidence-based rehabilitation therapy. TMS techniques may help in identifying neurophysiological biomarkers that can reliably assess the extent of neural damage, elucidate the mechanisms of neural repair, predict clinical outcome, and identify therapeutic targets. Some researchers have begun to therapeutically use repetitive TMS (rTMS) in patients with SCI. Initial studies revealed that rTMS can induce acute and short duration beneficial effects especially on spasticity and neuropathic pain, but the evidence is to date still very preliminary and well-designed clinical trials are warranted. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled SI: Spinal cord injury.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central motor conduction; Intracortical inhibition; Motor evoked potentials; Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; Spinal cord injury; Therapeutic applications; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25251591     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.09.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  14 in total

1.  Modulation of corticospinal input to the legs by arm and leg cycling in people with incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  R Zhou; L Alvarado; S Kim; S L Chong; V K Mushahwar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Long-term paired associative stimulation can restore voluntary control over paralyzed muscles in incomplete chronic spinal cord injury patients.

Authors:  Anastasia Shulga; Pantelis Lioumis; Aleksandra Zubareva; Nina Brandstack; Linda Kuusela; Erika Kirveskari; Sarianna Savolainen; Aarne Ylinen; Jyrki P Mäkelä
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2016-07-14

3.  The effect of intermittent theta burst stimulation on corticomotor excitability of the biceps brachii in nonimpaired individuals.

Authors:  Neil Mittal; Blaize C Majdic; Adam P Sima; Carrie L Peterson
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Intermittent theta burst stimulation modulates biceps brachii corticomotor excitability in individuals with tetraplegia.

Authors:  Neil Mittal; Blaize C Majdic; Carrie L Peterson
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 5.208

Review 5.  Spinal Cord Injury and Loss of Cortical Inhibition.

Authors:  Bruno Benedetti; Annika Weidenhammer; Maximilian Reisinger; Sebastien Couillard-Despres
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 6.208

6.  The robotic Trunk-Support-Trainer (TruST) to measure and increase postural workspace during sitting in people with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Victor Santamaria; Tatiana Luna; Moiz Khan; Sunil Agrawal
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2020-01-06

7.  Mental imagery-induced attention modulates pain perception and cortical excitability.

Authors:  Magdalena Sarah Volz; Vanessa Suarez-Contreras; Andrea L Santos Portilla; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 3.288

8.  A Systematic Review of Investigations into Functional Brain Connectivity Following Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Alkinoos Athanasiou; Manousos A Klados; Niki Pandria; Nicolas Foroglou; Kyriaki R Kavazidi; Konstantinos Polyzoidis; Panagiotis D Bamidis
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Brain White Matter Impairment in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Weimin Zheng; Qian Chen; Xin Chen; Lu Wan; Wen Qin; Zhigang Qi; Nan Chen; Kuncheng Li
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.599

10.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as an Additional Diagnostic Tool in Children with Acute Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy.

Authors:  Voitenkov Vladislav Voitenkov; Klimkin Andrey; Skripchenko Natalia; Aksenova Anastasia
Journal:  J Pediatr Neurosci       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.