Literature DB >> 28053760

Long-term paired associative stimulation can restore voluntary control over paralyzed muscles in incomplete chronic spinal cord injury patients.

Anastasia Shulga1, Pantelis Lioumis2, Aleksandra Zubareva2, Nina Brandstack3, Linda Kuusela4, Erika Kirveskari5, Sarianna Savolainen6, Aarne Ylinen7, Jyrki P Mäkelä2.   

Abstract

Emerging therapeutic strategies for spinal cord injury aim at sparing or restoring at least part of the corticospinal tract at the acute stage. Hence, approaches that strengthen the weak connections that are spared or restored are crucial. Transient plastic changes in the human corticospinal tract can be induced through paired associative stimulation, a noninvasive technique in which transcranial magnetic brain stimulation is synchronized with electrical peripheral nerve stimulation. A single paired associative stimulation session can induce transient plasticity in spinal cord injury patients. It is not known whether paired associative stimulation can strengthen neuronal connections persistently and have therapeutic effects that are clinically relevant. We recruited two patients with motor-incomplete chronic (one para- and one tetraplegic) spinal cord injuries. The patients received paired associative stimulation for 20-24 weeks. The paraplegic patient, previously paralyzed below the knee level, regained plantarflexion and dorsiflexion of the ankles of both legs. The tetraplegic patient regained grasping ability. The newly acquired voluntary movements could be performed by the patients in the absence of stimulation and for at least 1 month after the last stimulation session. In this unblinded proof-of-principle demonstration in two subjects, long-term paired associative stimulation induced persistent and clinically relevant strengthening of neural connections and restored voluntary movement in previously paralyzed muscles. Further study is needed to confirm whether long-term paired associative stimulation can be used in rehabilitation after spinal cord injury by itself and, possibly, in combination with other therapeutic strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diseases of the nervous system; Medical research

Year:  2016        PMID: 28053760      PMCID: PMC5129397          DOI: 10.1038/scsandc.2016.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases        ISSN: 2058-6124


  32 in total

1.  Modulation of associative human motor cortical plasticity by attention.

Authors:  Katja Stefan; Matthias Wycislo; Joseph Classen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Does induction of plastic change in motor cortex improve leg function after stroke?

Authors:  J Uy; M C Ridding; S Hillier; P D Thompson; T S Miles
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study.

Authors:  Susan Harkema; Yury Gerasimenko; Jonathan Hodes; Joel Burdick; Claudia Angeli; Yangsheng Chen; Christie Ferreira; Andrea Willhite; Enrico Rejc; Robert G Grossman; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Induction of persistent changes in the organisation of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Darrin R McKay; Michael C Ridding; Philip D Thompson; Timothy S Miles
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Exciting recovery: augmenting practice with stimulation to optimize outcomes after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Edelle C Field-Fote
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 2.453

Review 6.  Restoring function after spinal cord injury: towards clinical translation of experimental strategies.

Authors:  Leanne M Ramer; Matt S Ramer; Elizabeth J Bradbury
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 44.182

7.  Afferent regulation of leg motor cortex excitability after incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  François D Roy; Jaynie F Yang; Monica A Gorassini
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Cortical vs. afferent stimulation as an adjunct to functional task practice training: a randomized, comparative pilot study in people with cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Joyce Gomes-Osman; Edelle C Field-Fote
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.477

9.  Spinal associative stimulation: a non-invasive stimulation paradigm to modulate spinal excitability.

Authors:  Mar Cortes; Gary W Thickbroom; Josep Valls-Sole; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Dylan J Edwards
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Voluntary motor output is altered by spike-timing-dependent changes in the human corticospinal pathway.

Authors:  Janet L Taylor; Peter G Martin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Supraspinal Control Predicts Locomotor Function and Forecasts Responsiveness to Training after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Edelle C Field-Fote; Jaynie F Yang; D Michele Basso; Monica A Gorassini
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Promotion of corticospinal tract growth by KLF6 requires an injury stimulus and occurs within four weeks of treatment.

Authors:  Audra A Kramer; Greta M Olson; Advaita Chakraborty; Murray G Blackmore
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 5.330

3.  Paired Associative Stimulation with High-Frequency Peripheral Component Leads to Enhancement of Corticospinal Transmission at Wide Range of Interstimulus Intervals.

Authors:  Anastasia Shulga; Aleksandra Zubareva; Pantelis Lioumis; Jyrki P Mäkelä
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Long-Term Paired Associative Stimulation Enhances Motor Output of the Tetraplegic Hand.

Authors:  Aleksandra Tolmacheva; Sarianna Savolainen; Erika Kirveskari; Pantelis Lioumis; Linda Kuusela; Nina Brandstack; Aarne Ylinen; Jyrki P Mäkelä; Anastasia Shulga
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 5.  Non-invasive brain stimulation to promote motor and functional recovery following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Aysegul Gunduz; John Rothwell; Joan Vidal; Hatice Kumru
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.135

6.  Increasing the frequency of peripheral component in paired associative stimulation strengthens its efficacy.

Authors:  Aleksandra Tolmacheva; Jyrki P Mäkelä; Anastasia Shulga
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Restoration of hand function with long-term paired associative stimulation after chronic incomplete tetraplegia: a case study.

Authors:  A Rodionov; S Savolainen; E Kirveskari; J P Mäkelä; A Shulga
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2019-10-01

8.  Motor Point Stimulation in Spinal Paired Associative Stimulation can Facilitate Spinal Cord Excitability.

Authors:  Kai Lon Fok; Naotsugu Kaneko; Atsushi Sasaki; Kento Nakagawa; Kimitaka Nakazawa; Kei Masani
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Omitting TMS component from paired associative stimulation with high-frequency PNS: A case series of tetraplegic patients.

Authors:  Markus Pohjonen; Sarianna Savolainen; Jari Arokoski; Anastasia Shulga
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2021-02-20

10.  Paired associative stimulation improves hand function after non-traumatic spinal cord injury: A case series.

Authors:  Aleksandra Tolmacheva; Sarianna Savolainen; Erika Kirveskari; Nina Brandstack; Jyrki P Mäkelä; Anastasia Shulga
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2019-08-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.