Literature DB >> 28701544

Modulation of corticospinal input to the legs by arm and leg cycling in people with incomplete spinal cord injury.

R Zhou1,2, L Alvarado1,2, S Kim3,2, S L Chong3,2, V K Mushahwar4,3,2.   

Abstract

The spinal cervico-lumbar interaction during rhythmic movements in humans has recently been studied; however, the role of arm movements in modulating the corticospinal drive to the legs is not well understood. The goals of this study were to investigate the effect of active rhythmic arm movements on the corticospinal drive to the legs (study 1) and assess the effect of simultaneous arm and leg training on the corticospinal pathway after incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) (study 2). In study 1, neurologically intact (NI) participants or participants with iSCI performed combinations of stationary and rhythmic cycling of the arms and legs while motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the vastus lateralis (VL) muscle. In the NI group, arm cycling alone could facilitate the VL MEP amplitude, suggesting that dynamic arm movements strongly modulate the corticospinal pathway to the legs. No significant difference in VL MEP between conditions was found in participants with iSCI. In study 2, participants with iSCI underwent 12 wk of electrical stimulation-assisted cycling training: one group performed simultaneous arm and leg (A&L) cycling and the other legs-only cycling. MEPs in the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle were compared before and after training. After training, only the A&L group had a significantly larger TA MEP, suggesting increased excitability in the corticospinal pathway. The findings demonstrate the importance of arm movements in modulating the corticospinal drive to the legs and suggest that active engagement of the arms in lower limb rehabilitation may produce better neural regulation and restoration of function.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study aimed to demonstrate the importance of arm movements in modulating the corticospinal drive to the legs. It provides direct evidence in humans that active movement of the arms could facilitate corticospinal transmission to the legs and, for the first time, shows that facilitation is absent after spinal cord injury. Active engagement of the arms in lower limb rehabilitation increased the excitability of the corticospinal pathway and may produce more effective improvement in leg function.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  corticospinal pathway; interlimb coordination; locomotor training; motor evoked potential; rhythmic movements

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28701544      PMCID: PMC5646203          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00663.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  73 in total

Review 1.  On the comparability of H-reflexes and MEPs.

Authors:  J Nielsen; H Morita; J Baumgarten; N Petersen; L O Christensen
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl       Date:  1999

2.  Inhibition of ipsilateral motor cortex during phasic generation of low force.

Authors:  J Liepert; C Dettmers; C Terborg; C Weiller
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 3.  Electrophysiological recordings in patients with spinal cord injury: significance for predicting outcome.

Authors:  A Curt; V Dietz
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 4.  Spinal and supraspinal plasticity after incomplete spinal cord injury: correlations between functional magnetic resonance imaging and engaged locomotor networks.

Authors:  B H Dobkin
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.453

5.  Reliability of the input-output properties of the cortico-spinal pathway obtained from transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation.

Authors:  T J Carroll; S Riek; R G Carson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Excitability changes in human corticospinal projections to forearm muscles during voluntary movement of ipsilateral foot.

Authors:  Fausto Baldissera; Paola Borroni; Paolo Cavallari; Gabriella Cerri
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Brain areas involved in interlimb coordination: a distributed network.

Authors:  F Debaere; S P Swinnen; E Béatse; S Sunaert; P Van Hecke; J Duysens
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Arm to leg coordination in humans during walking, creeping and swimming activities.

Authors:  T Wannier; C Bastiaanse; G Colombo; V Dietz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Cervical sprouting of corticospinal fibers after thoracic spinal cord injury accompanies shifts in evoked motor responses.

Authors:  K Fouad; V Pedersen; M E Schwab; C Brösamle
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-11-13       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 10.  Do human bipeds use quadrupedal coordination?

Authors:  Volker Dietz
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 13.837

View more
  4 in total

1.  Rhythmic arm cycling training improves walking and neurophysiological integrity in chronic stroke: the arms can give legs a helping hand in rehabilitation.

Authors:  Chelsea Kaupp; Gregory E P Pearcey; Taryn Klarner; Yao Sun; Hilary Cullen; Trevor S Barss; E Paul Zehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Global Corticospinal Excitability as Assessed in A Non-Exercised Upper Limb Muscle Compared Between Concentric and Eccentric Modes of Leg Cycling.

Authors:  Joel A Walsh; Paul J Stapley; Jonathan B H Shemmell; Romuald Lepers; Darryl J McAndrew
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Subject specific muscle synergies and mechanical output during cycling with arms or legs.

Authors:  Théo Cartier; Laurent Vigouroux; Elke Viehweger; Guillaume Rao
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  A 12-Week Cycling Training Regimen Improves Upper Limb Functions in People With Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Alexandra Nadeau; Ovidiu Lungu; Arnaud Boré; Réjean Plamondon; Catherine Duchesne; Marie-Ève Robillard; Florian Bobeuf; Anne-Louise Lafontaine; Freja Gheysen; Louis Bherer; Julien Doyon
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.