Literature DB >> 25249313

Intraindividual, randomized comparison of the macrocyclic contrast agents gadobutrol and gadoterate meglumine in breast magnetic resonance imaging.

Eva M Fallenberg1, Diane M Renz, Bettina Karle, Carsten Schwenke, Barbara Ingod-Heppner, Angela Reles, Florian J Engelken, Alexander Huppertz, Bernd Hamm, Matthias Taupitz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare intraindividually two macrocyclic contrast agents - gadobutrol and gadoterate meglumine (Gd-DOTA) - for dynamic and quantitative assessment of relative enhancement (RE) in benign and malignant breast lesions.
METHODS: This was an ethically approved, prospective, single-centre, randomized, crossover study in 52 women with suspected breast lesions referred for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Each patient underwent one examination with gadobutrol and one with Gd-DOTA (0.1 mmol/kg BW) on a 1.5 T system 1 - 7 days apart. Dynamic, T1-weighted, 3D gradient echo sequences were acquired under identical conditions. Quantitative evaluation with at least three regions of interest (ROI) per lesion was performed. Primary endpoint was RE during the initial postcontrast phase after the first and second dynamic acquisition, and peak RE. All lesions were histologically proven; differences between the examinations were evaluated.
RESULTS: Forty-five patients with a total of 11 benign and 34 malignant lesions were assessed. Mean RE was significantly higher for gadobutrol than Gd-DOTA (p < 0.0001). Gadobutrol showed significantly less washout (64.4 %) than Gd-DOTA (75.4 %) in malignant lesions (p = 0.048)
CONCLUSIONS: Gadobutrol has higher RE values compared with Gd-DOTA, whereas Gd-DOTA shows more marked washout in malignant lesions. This might improve the detection of breast lesions and influence the specificity of breast MRI-imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25249313     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3426-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  42 in total

1.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?

Authors:  C K Kuhl; P Mielcareck; S Klaschik; C Leutner; E Wardelmann; J Gieseke; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Contrast-enhanced MR mammography: improved lesion detection and differentiation with gadobenate dimeglumine.

Authors:  Federica Pediconi; Carlo Catalano; Simona Padula; Antonella Roselli; Valeria Dominelli; Sabrina Cagioli; Miles A Kirchin; Gianpaolo Pirovano; Roberto Passariello
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Extracellular gadolinium-based contrast media: differences in diagnostic efficacy.

Authors:  Aart J van der Molen; Marie-France Bellin
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Gd-DOTA. Pharmacokinetics and tolerability after intravenous injection into healthy volunteers.

Authors:  M M Le Mignon; C Chambon; S Warrington; R Davies; B Bonnemain
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 5.  Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions.

Authors:  S H Heywang-Köbrunner; P Viehweg; A Heinig; C Küchler
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Observer variability in the interpretation of contrast enhanced MRI of the breast.

Authors:  S Mussurakis; D L Buckley; A M Coady; L W Turnbull; A Horsman
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Detection of cerebral metastases on magnetic resonance imaging: intraindividual comparison of gadobutrol with gadopentetate dimeglumine.

Authors:  Nicoletta Anzalone; Simonetta Gerevini; Roberta Scotti; Paolo Vezzulli; Piero Picozzi
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.990

8.  Kinetic curves of malignant lesions are not consistent across MRI systems: need for improved standardization of breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI acquisition.

Authors:  Sanaz A Jansen; Akiko Shimauchi; Lindsay Zak; Xiaobing Fan; Abbie M Wood; Gregory S Karczmar; Gillian M Newstead
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Glycosaminoglycans in human breast cancer.

Authors:  E B Olsen; K Trier; K Eldov; T Ammitzbøll
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.636

10.  Differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses by time-intensity evaluation of contrast enhanced MRI.

Authors:  F W Flickinger; J D Allison; R M Sherry; J C Wright
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.546

View more
  5 in total

1.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: intraindividual comparison of gadoterate meglumine and gadobutrol.

Authors:  Chau Hung Lee; Balamurugan Vellayappan; Matthias Taupitz; Bernd Hamm; Patrick Asbach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhancement Parameters between Gadobutrol and Gadoterate Meglumine in Posttreatment Glioma: A Prospective Intraindividual Study.

Authors:  J E Park; J Y Kim; H S Kim; W H Shim
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Sensitivity of Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI vs X-ray Mammography Based on Cancer Histology, Tumor Grading, Receptor Status, and Molecular Subtype: A Supplemental Analysis of 2 Large Phase III Studies.

Authors:  Jan Endrikat; Gilda Schmidt; Daniel Haverstock; Olaf Weber; Zuzana Jirakova Trnkova; Jörg Barkhausen
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2022-04-19

Review 4.  Gadobutrol in India-A Comprehensive Review of Safety and Efficacy.

Authors:  Jan Endrikat; Nicoletta Anzalone
Journal:  Magn Reson Insights       Date:  2017-09-11

Review 5.  Gadobutrol: A Review in Contrast-Enhanced MRI and MRA.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.859

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.