Literature DB >> 18372137

Extracellular gadolinium-based contrast media: differences in diagnostic efficacy.

Aart J van der Molen1, Marie-France Bellin.   

Abstract

Since the introduction of the first gadolinium-based contrast agent (Gd-CA) in 1988 it has become clear that these agents significantly improve the diagnostic efficacy of MRI. Studies on single agents have shown that, in comparison to unenhanced sequences, all agents help to improve the detection and delineation of lesions which can alter diagnosis in up to 40% of patients. Doubling or tripling the standard dose of 0.1 mmol/kg body weight may be beneficial for selected indications (e.g. brain perfusion, equivocal single dose study in MRI for brain metastasis, small vessel MR angiography). A more limited number of studies have compared the various agents. These studies do not show clinically significant differences in diagnostic efficacy between the various extracellular Gd-CA. Agents with higher concentration or protein binding may be relatively better suitable for selected applications (e.g. perfusion MRI). The higher relaxivity agents may be used in somewhat lower doses than the extracellular agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18372137     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  8 in total

Review 1.  MR imaging of neoplastic central nervous system lesions: review and recommendations for current practice.

Authors:  M Essig; N Anzalone; S E Combs; À Dörfler; S-K Lee; P Picozzi; A Rovira; M Weller; M Law
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Candidate biomarkers of extravascular extracellular space: a direct comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging--derived measurement of the volume of the extravascular extracellular space in glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  S J Mills; C Soh; C J Rose; S Cheung; S Zhao; G J M Parker; A Jackson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Diagnostic yield of double-dose gadobutrol in the detection of brain metastasis: intraindividual comparison with double-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine.

Authors:  E S Kim; J H Chang; H S Choi; J Kim; S-K Lee
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Gadolinium in Medical Imaging-Usefulness, Toxic Reactions and Possible Countermeasures-A Review.

Authors:  Lennart Blomqvist; Gunnar F Nordberg; Valeria M Nurchi; Jan O Aaseth
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-05-24

5.  Contributions of Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Gastroenterological Practice: MRIs for GIs.

Authors:  Christopher G Roth; Dina Halegoua-De Marzio; Flavius F Guglielmo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Intraindividual, randomized comparison of the macrocyclic contrast agents gadobutrol and gadoterate meglumine in breast magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Eva M Fallenberg; Diane M Renz; Bettina Karle; Carsten Schwenke; Barbara Ingod-Heppner; Angela Reles; Florian J Engelken; Alexander Huppertz; Bernd Hamm; Matthias Taupitz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Brain metastases from breast cancer: lessons from experimental magnetic resonance imaging studies and clinical implications.

Authors:  Donna H Murrell; Paula J Foster; Ann F Chambers
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  T1 mapping of the myocardium: intra-individual assessment of the effect of field strength, cardiac cycle and variation by myocardial region.

Authors:  Nadine Kawel; Marcelo Nacif; Anna Zavodni; Jacquin Jones; Songtao Liu; Christopher T Sibley; David A Bluemke
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 5.364

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.