Literature DB >> 25248750

Implicit learning of gaze-contingent events.

Tom Beesley1, Daniel Pearson, Mike Le Pelley.   

Abstract

In a novel implicit learning task, participants responded to a target stimulus that could appear in one of three locations. Unknown to participants, the location in which the target appeared was probabilistically determined on the basis of the location of eye-gaze immediately prior to the appearance of the target. Participants' response times to the appearance of the target in a high-probability location were faster than when it appeared in a low-probability location, revealing that participants were able to learn these gaze-contingent events. Furthermore, there was no difference in the cuing score between those participants classified as aware or unaware of the contingencies on a subsequent forced-choice recognition task. These data suggest the task involves implicit learning of instrumental (action-outcome) contingencies, which has potential implications for our understanding of gaze-contingent processes in social interaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25248750     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0720-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  10 in total

1.  Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure.

Authors:  A Destrebecqz; A Cleeremans
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

2.  Dissociation between priming and recognition in the expression of sequential knowledge.

Authors:  David R Shanks; Pierre Perruchet
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

3.  Learning the structure of event sequences.

Authors:  A Cleeremans; J L McClelland
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1991-09

4.  Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention?

Authors:  Melina A Kunar; Stephen Flusberg; Todd S Horowitz; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  Learning: from association to cognition.

Authors:  David R Shanks
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 24.137

6.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism.

Authors:  H Deubel; W X Schneider
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The look of love: gaze shifts and person perception.

Authors:  Malia F Mason; Elizabeth P Tatkow; C Neil Macrae
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-03

8.  Attentional load and implicit sequence learning.

Authors:  David R Shanks; Lee A Rowland; Mandeep S Ranger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-04-23

9.  Evaluating the relationship between explicit and implicit knowledge in a sequential reaction time task.

Authors:  D R Shanks; T Johnstone
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Outcome value influences attentional biases in human associative learning: dissociable effects of training and instruction.

Authors:  Mike E Le Pelley; Chris J Mitchell; Ameika M Johnson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2013-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.