Literature DB >> 25246586

Unique semantic space in the brain of each beholder predicts perceived similarity.

Ian Charest1, Rogier A Kievit2, Taylor W Schmitz2, Diana Deca3, Nikolaus Kriegeskorte1.   

Abstract

The unique way in which each of us perceives the world must arise from our brain representations. If brain imaging could reveal an individual's unique mental representation, it could help us understand the biological substrate of our individual experiential worlds in mental health and disease. However, imaging studies of object vision have focused on commonalities between individuals rather than individual differences and on category averages rather than representations of particular objects. Here we investigate the individually unique component of brain representations of particular objects with functional MRI (fMRI). Subjects were presented with unfamiliar and personally meaningful object images while we measured their brain activity on two separate days. We characterized the representational geometry by the dissimilarity matrix of activity patterns elicited by particular object images. The representational geometry remained stable across scanning days and was unique in each individual in early visual cortex and human inferior temporal cortex (hIT). The hIT representation predicted perceived similarity as reflected in dissimilarity judgments. Importantly, hIT predicted the individually unique component of the judgments when the objects were personally meaningful. Our results suggest that hIT brain representational idiosyncrasies accessible to fMRI are expressed in an individual's perceptual judgments. The unique way each of us perceives the world thus might reflect the individually unique representation in high-level visual areas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  memory; neuroimaging; object representations; representational similarity analysis; visual perception

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25246586      PMCID: PMC4209976          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1402594111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  54 in total

1.  Visual field representations and locations of visual areas V1/2/3 in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Robert F Dougherty; Volker M Koch; Alyssa A Brewer; Bernd Fischer; Jan Modersitzki; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003-10-24       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Partially distributed representations of objects and faces in ventral temporal cortex.

Authors:  Alice J O'Toole; Fang Jiang; Hervé Abdi; James V Haxby
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Scott O Murray; Huseyin Boyaci; Daniel Kersten
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-05       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  The degraded concept representation system in semantic dementia: damage to pan-modal hub, then visual spoke.

Authors:  Paul Hoffman; Roy W Jones; Matthew A Lambon Ralph
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Compressive spatial summation in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Kendrick N Kay; Jonathan Winawer; Aviv Mezer; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Cortical representation of animate and inanimate objects in complex natural scenes.

Authors:  Thomas Naselaris; Dustin E Stansbury; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2012-03-28

7.  The topography and variability of the primary visual cortex in man.

Authors:  S S Stensaas; D K Eddington; W H Dobelle
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 8.  Vagaries of visual perception in autism.

Authors:  Steven Dakin; Uta Frith
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Decoding the representation of multiple simultaneous objects in human occipitotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Sean P Macevoy; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Inverse MDS: Inferring Dissimilarity Structure from Multiple Item Arrangements.

Authors:  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Marieke Mur
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-07-25
View more
  35 in total

Review 1.  Template-to-distractor distinctiveness regulates visual search efficiency.

Authors:  Joy J Geng; Phillip Witkowski
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-01-11

2.  Semantic representations in the temporal pole predict false memories.

Authors:  Martin J Chadwick; Raeesa S Anjum; Dharshan Kumaran; Daniel L Schacter; Hugo J Spiers; Demis Hassabis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Interpreting BOLD: towards a dialogue between cognitive and cellular neuroscience.

Authors:  Catherine N Hall; Clare Howarth; Zebulun Kurth-Nelson; Anusha Mishra
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Are the Neural Correlates of Consciousness in the Front or in the Back of the Cerebral Cortex? Clinical and Neuroimaging Evidence.

Authors:  Melanie Boly; Marcello Massimini; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Bradley R Postle; Christof Koch; Giulio Tononi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Measuring shared responses across subjects using intersubject correlation.

Authors:  Samuel A Nastase; Valeria Gazzola; Uri Hasson; Christian Keysers
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Inter-electrode correlations measured with EEG predict individual differences in cognitive ability.

Authors:  Nicole Hakim; Edward Awh; Edward K Vogel; Monica D Rosenberg
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 7.  Building a Science of Individual Differences from fMRI.

Authors:  Julien Dubois; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Idiosyncratic Patterns of Representational Similarity in Prefrontal Cortex Predict Attentional Performance.

Authors:  Jeongmi Lee; Joy J Geng
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Neural Coding of Cognitive Control: The Representational Similarity Analysis Approach.

Authors:  Michael C Freund; Joset A Etzel; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 24.482

10.  Combined Neural Tuning in Human Ventral Temporal Cortex Resolves the Perceptual Ambiguity of Morphed 2D Images.

Authors:  Mona Rosenke; Nicolas Davidenko; Kalanit Grill-Spector; Kevin S Weiner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.