Literature DB >> 25245440

Appropriateness of imaging for lung cancer staging in a national cohort.

Leah M Backhus1, Farhood Farjah2, Thomas K Varghese2, Aaron M Cheng2, Xiao-Hua Zhou2, Douglas E Wood2, Larry Kessler2, Steven B Zeliadt2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Optimizing evidence-based care to improve quality is a critical priority in the United States. We sought to examine adherence to imaging guideline recommendations for staging in patients with locally advanced lung cancer in a national cohort.
METHODS: We identified 3,808 patients with stage IIB, IIIA, or IIIB lung cancer by using the national Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Central Cancer Registry (2004-2007) and linked these patients to VA and Medicare databases to examine receipt of guideline-recommended imaging based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria. Our primary outcomes were receipt of guideline-recommended brain imaging and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. We also examined rates of overuse defined as combined use of bone scintigraphy (BS) and PET, which current guidelines recommend against. All imaging was assessed during the period 180 days before and 180 days after diagnosis.
RESULTS: Nearly 75% of patients received recommended brain imaging, and 60% received recommended PET imaging. Overuse of BS and PET occurred in 25% of patients. More advanced clinical stage and later year of diagnosis were the only clinical or demographic factors associated with higher rates of guideline-recommended imaging after adjusting for covariates. We observed considerable regional variation in recommended PET imaging and overuse of combined BS and PET.
CONCLUSION: Receipt of guideline-recommended imaging is not universal. PET appears to be underused overall, whereas BS demonstrates continued overuse. Wide regional variation suggests that these findings could be the result of local practice patterns, which may be amenable to provider education efforts such as Choosing Wisely.
© 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25245440      PMCID: PMC4195853          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.6589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  37 in total

1.  Choosing wisely: helping physicians and patients make smart decisions about their care.

Authors:  Christine K Cassel; James A Guest
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria® noninvasive clinical staging of bronchogenic carcinoma.

Authors:  James G Ravenel; Tan-Lucien H Mohammed; Benjamin Movsas; Mark E Ginsburg; Jacobo Kirsch; Feng-Ming Kong; J Anthony Parker; Gautham P Reddy; Kenneth E Rosenzweig; Anthony G Saleh
Journal:  J Thorac Imaging       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Evaluation of CT and MRI scanning among cancer patients in Ontario.

Authors:  Natalie Coburn; Raymond Przybysz; Lisa Barbera; David C Hodgson; Andreas Laupacis; Calvin Law
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.605

4.  Wide variation and rising utilization of stroke magnetic resonance imaging: data from 11 states.

Authors:  James F Burke; Kevin A Kerber; Theodore J Iwashyna; Lewis B Morgenstern
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 5.  ACR appropriateness criteria on metastatic bone disease.

Authors:  Catherine C Roberts; Richard H Daffner; Barbara N Weissman; Laura Bancroft; D Lee Bennett; Judy S Blebea; Michael A Bruno; Ian Blair Fries; Isabelle M Germano; Langston Holly; Jon A Jacobson; Jonathan S Luchs; William B Morrison; Jeffrey J Olson; William K Payne; Charles S Resnik; Mark E Schweitzer; Leanne L Seeger; Mihra Taljanovic; James N Wise; Stephen T Lutz
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010-2020.

Authors:  Angela B Mariotto; K Robin Yabroff; Yongwu Shao; Eric J Feuer; Martin L Brown
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Advanced imaging modalities in early stage breast cancer: preoperative use in the United States Medicare population.

Authors:  Margaret L Crivello; Karen Ruth; Elin R Sigurdson; Brian L Egleston; Kathryn Evers; Yu-Ning Wong; Marcia Boraas; Richard J Bleicher
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Repeat testing among Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch; Kevin J Hayes; Carol Frost
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-12-10

9.  High-cost imaging in elderly patients with stage IV cancer.

Authors:  Yue-Yung Hu; Alvin C Kwok; Wei Jiang; Nathan Taback; Elizabeth T Loggers; Gladys V Ting; Stuart R Lipsitz; Jane C Weeks; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Geographic and sociodemographic disparities in PET use by Medicare beneficiaries with cancer.

Authors:  Tracy Onega; Tor D Tosteson; Qianfei Wang; Bruce E Hillner; Yunjie Song; Barry A Siegel; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.532

View more
  8 in total

1.  Implementing effective and sustainable multidisciplinary clinical thoracic oncology programs.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Richard K Freeman; Mark J Krasna
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

Review 2.  Overuse of Health Care Services in the Management of Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shrujal S Baxi; Minal Kale; Salomeh Keyhani; Benjamin R Roman; Annie Yang; Antonio P Derosa; Deborah Korenstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Performance of a rule-based semi-automated method to optimize chart abstraction for surveillance imaging among patients treated for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Catherine Byrd; Ureka Ajawara; Ryan Laundry; John Radin; Prasha Bhandari; Ann Leung; Summer Han; Stephen M Asch; Steven Zeliadt; Alex H S Harris; Leah Backhus
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.298

4.  Reducing Bottlenecks to Improve the Efficiency of the Lung Cancer Care Delivery Process: A Process Engineering Modeling Approach to Patient-Centered Care.

Authors:  Feng Ju; Hyo Kyung Lee; Xinhua Yu; Nicholas R Faris; Fedoria Rugless; Shan Jiang; Jingshan Li; Raymond U Osarogiagbon
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 5.  Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world.

Authors:  Shannon Brownlee; Kalipso Chalkidou; Jenny Doust; Adam G Elshaug; Paul Glasziou; Iona Heath; Somil Nagpal; Vikas Saini; Divya Srivastava; Kelsey Chalmers; Deborah Korenstein
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  FDG PET/CT in cancer: comparison of actual use with literature-based recommendations.

Authors:  Henrik Petersen; Paw Christian Holdgaard; Poul Henning Madsen; Lene Meldgaard Knudsen; Dorte Gad; Anders Eggert Gravergaard; Max Rohde; Christian Godballe; Bodil Elisabeth Engelmann; Karsten Bech; Dorte Teilmann-Jørgensen; Ole Mogensen; Jens Karstoft; Jørgen Johansen; Janne Buck Christensen; Allan Johansen; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review.

Authors:  Elin Kjelle; Eivind Richter Andersen; Arne Magnus Krokeide; Lesley J J Soril; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; Fiona M Clement; Bjørn Morten Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.795

Review 8.  Choosing wisely in oncology: necessity and obstacles.

Authors:  Piercarlo Saletti; Piero Sanna; Luca Gabutti; Michele Ghielmini
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2018-07-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.