Literature DB >> 20522392

ACR appropriateness criteria on metastatic bone disease.

Catherine C Roberts1, Richard H Daffner, Barbara N Weissman, Laura Bancroft, D Lee Bennett, Judy S Blebea, Michael A Bruno, Ian Blair Fries, Isabelle M Germano, Langston Holly, Jon A Jacobson, Jonathan S Luchs, William B Morrison, Jeffrey J Olson, William K Payne, Charles S Resnik, Mark E Schweitzer, Leanne L Seeger, Mihra Taljanovic, James N Wise, Stephen T Lutz.   

Abstract

Appropriate imaging modalities for screening, staging, and surveillance of patients with suspected and documented metastatic disease to bone include (99m)Tc bone scanning, MRI, CT, radiography, and 2-[(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose-PET. Clinical scenarios reviewed include asymptomatic stage 1 breast carcinoma, symptomatic stage 2 breast carcinoma, abnormal bone scan results with breast carcinoma, pathologic fracture with known metastatic breast carcinoma, asymptomatic well-differentiated and poorly differentiated prostate carcinoma, vertebral fracture with history of malignancy, non-small-cell lung carcinoma staging, symptomatic multiple myeloma, osteosarcoma staging and surveillance, and suspected bone metastasis in a pregnant patient. No single imaging modality is consistently best for the assessment of metastatic bone disease across all tumor types and clinical situations. In some cases, no imaging is indicated. The recommendations contained herein are the result of evidence-based consensus by the ACR Appropriateness Criteria((R)) Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal Radiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20522392     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.02.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  10 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of bone metastasis: An update.

Authors:  Gerard J O'Sullivan; Fiona L Carty; Carmel G Cronin
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-08-28

2.  Expression profile of Twist, vascular endothelial growth factor and CD34 in patients with different phases of osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Pengfei Lei; Dengfeng Ding; Jie Xie; Long Wang; Qiande Liao; Yihe Hu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Extra-mammary findings in breast MRI.

Authors:  Pierluigi Rinaldi; M Costantini; P Belli; M Giuliani; E Bufi; R Fubelli; D Distefano; M Romani; L Bonomo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Bone metastases in non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review.

Authors:  Brendan J Knapp; Siddhartha Devarakonda; Ramaswamy Govindan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 3.005

Review 5.  Imaging guidelines and findings of extracranial glioblastoma.

Authors:  Daniel Thomas Ginat; Pamela W Schaefer
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Appropriateness of imaging for lung cancer staging in a national cohort.

Authors:  Leah M Backhus; Farhood Farjah; Thomas K Varghese; Aaron M Cheng; Xiao-Hua Zhou; Douglas E Wood; Larry Kessler; Steven B Zeliadt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Comparison of 18F-NaF PET/CT with Other Imaging Methods in the Detection of Bone Metastases in Patients with Medullary Thyroid Cancer: a Report of a Series of 31 Cases.

Authors:  Cristina Emiko Ueda; Paulo Schiavom Duarte; Luciana Audi de Castroneves; George Barbério Coura-Filho; Heitor Naoki Sado; Marcelo Tatit Sapienza; Ana Oliveira Hoff; Carlos Alberto Buchpiguel
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-09-28

8.  Diagnostic imaging for spinal disorders in the elderly: a narrative review.

Authors:  John Am Taylor; André Bussières
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2012-05-24

Review 9.  Detecting Tumor Metastases: The Road to Therapy Starts Here.

Authors:  M E Menezes; S K Das; I Minn; L Emdad; X-Y Wang; D Sarkar; M G Pomper; P B Fisher
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 6.242

10.  Bone metastases from breast cancer: associations between morphologic CT patterns and glycolytic activity on PET and bone scintigraphy as well as explorative search for influential factors.

Authors:  Tsutomu Sugihara; Mitsuru Koizumi; Masamichi Koyama; Takashi Terauchi; Naoya Gomi; Yoshinori Ito; Kiyohiko Hatake; Naohiro Sata
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.668

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.