Literature DB >> 29196866

Reducing Bottlenecks to Improve the Efficiency of the Lung Cancer Care Delivery Process: A Process Engineering Modeling Approach to Patient-Centered Care.

Feng Ju1, Hyo Kyung Lee2, Xinhua Yu3, Nicholas R Faris4, Fedoria Rugless4, Shan Jiang5, Jingshan Li2, Raymond U Osarogiagbon6,7.   

Abstract

The process of lung cancer care from initial lesion detection to treatment is complex, involving multiple steps, each introducing the potential for substantial delays. Identifying the steps with the greatest delays enables a focused effort to improve the timeliness of care-delivery, without sacrificing quality. We retrospectively reviewed clinical events from initial detection, through histologic diagnosis, radiologic and invasive staging, and medical clearance, to surgery for all patients who had an attempted resection of a suspected lung cancer in a community healthcare system. We used a computer process modeling approach to evaluate delays in care delivery, in order to identify potential 'bottlenecks' in waiting time, the reduction of which could produce greater care efficiency. We also conducted 'what-if' analyses to predict the relative impact of simulated changes in the care delivery process to determine the most efficient pathways to surgery. The waiting time between radiologic lesion detection and diagnostic biopsy, and the waiting time from radiologic staging to surgery were the two most critical bottlenecks impeding efficient care delivery (more than 3 times larger compared to reducing other waiting times). Additionally, instituting surgical consultation prior to cardiac consultation for medical clearance and decreasing the waiting time between CT scans and diagnostic biopsies, were potentially the most impactful measures to reduce care delays before surgery. Rigorous computer simulation modeling, using clinical data, can provide useful information to identify areas for improving the efficiency of care delivery by process engineering, for patients who receive surgery for lung cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bottlenecks; Computer modeling; Diagnosis-to-treatment process; Lung cancer; Waiting time

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29196866     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-017-0873-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  13 in total

1.  Characteristics and predictors of missed opportunities in lung cancer diagnosis: an electronic health record-based study.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Kamal Hirani; Himabindu Kadiyala; Olga Rudomiotov; Traber Davis; Myrna M Khan; Terry L Wahls
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Modeling and analysis of work flow and staffing level in a computed tomography division of University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation.

Authors:  Junwen Wang; Shichuan Quan; Jingshan Li; Amy M Hollis
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2011-11-30

Review 3.  Computer modeling of lung cancer diagnosis-to-treatment process.

Authors:  Feng Ju; Hyo Kyung Lee; Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Xinhua Yu; Nick Faris; Jingshan Li
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

4.  Delays in diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer: Lessons from US healthcare settings.

Authors:  M M Koo; Y Zhou; G Lyratzopoulos
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Delays in lung cancer care: time to improve.

Authors:  Michael K Gould
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 15.609

6.  Patterns of surgical care of lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Alex G Little; Valerie W Rusch; James A Bonner; Laurie E Gaspar; Mark R Green; W Richard Webb; Andrew K Stewart
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Guideline-concordant timely lung cancer care and prognosis among elderly patients in the United States: A population-based study.

Authors:  Pramit Nadpara; S Suresh Madhavan; Cindy Tworek
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  'One-stop shop': lung cancer patients' and caregivers' perceptions of multidisciplinary care in a community healthcare setting.

Authors:  Satish K Kedia; Kenneth D Ward; Siri A Digney; Bianca M Jackson; April L Nellum; Laura McHugh; Kristina S Roark; Orion T Osborne; Fayre J Crossley; Nicholas Faris; Raymond U Osarogiagbon
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

9.  Quality gaps and comparative effectiveness in lung cancer staging and diagnosis.

Authors:  David E Ost; Jiangong Niu; Linda S Elting; Thomas A Buchholz; Sharon H Giordano
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Appropriateness of imaging for lung cancer staging in a national cohort.

Authors:  Leah M Backhus; Farhood Farjah; Thomas K Varghese; Aaron M Cheng; Xiao-Hua Zhou; Douglas E Wood; Larry Kessler; Steven B Zeliadt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.