PURPOSE: Transverse relaxation analysis with several signal models has been used extensively to determine tissue and material properties. However, the derivation of corresponding parameter values is notoriously unreliable. We evaluate improvements in the quality of parameter estimation using Bayesian analysis and incorporating the Rician noise model, as appropriate for magnitude MR images. THEORY AND METHODS: Monoexponential, stretched exponential, and biexponential signal models were analyzed using nonlinear least squares (NLLS) and Bayesian approaches. Simulations and phantom and human brain data were analyzed using three different approaches to account for noise. Parameter estimation bias (reflecting accuracy) and dispersion (reflecting precision) were derived for a range of signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and relaxation parameters. RESULTS: All methods performed well at high SNR. At lower SNR, the Bayesian approach yielded parameter estimates of considerably greater precision, as well as greater accuracy, than did NLLS. Incorporation of the Rician noise model greatly improved accuracy and, to a somewhat lesser extent, precision, in derived transverse relaxation parameters. Analyses of data obtained from solution phantoms and from brain were consistent with simulations. CONCLUSION: Overall, estimation of parameters characterizing several different transverse relaxation models was markedly improved through use of Bayesian analysis and through incorporation of the Rician noise model.
PURPOSE: Transverse relaxation analysis with several signal models has been used extensively to determine tissue and material properties. However, the derivation of corresponding parameter values is notoriously unreliable. We evaluate improvements in the quality of parameter estimation using Bayesian analysis and incorporating the Rician noise model, as appropriate for magnitude MR images. THEORY AND METHODS: Monoexponential, stretched exponential, and biexponential signal models were analyzed using nonlinear least squares (NLLS) and Bayesian approaches. Simulations and phantom and human brain data were analyzed using three different approaches to account for noise. Parameter estimation bias (reflecting accuracy) and dispersion (reflecting precision) were derived for a range of signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and relaxation parameters. RESULTS: All methods performed well at high SNR. At lower SNR, the Bayesian approach yielded parameter estimates of considerably greater precision, as well as greater accuracy, than did NLLS. Incorporation of the Rician noise model greatly improved accuracy and, to a somewhat lesser extent, precision, in derived transverse relaxation parameters. Analyses of data obtained from solution phantoms and from brain were consistent with simulations. CONCLUSION: Overall, estimation of parameters characterizing several different transverse relaxation models was markedly improved through use of Bayesian analysis and through incorporation of the Rician noise model.
Authors: Kevin M Bennett; Kathleen M Schmainda; Raoqiong Tong Bennett; Daniel B Rowe; Hanbing Lu; James S Hyde Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Matthew R Orton; David J Collins; Simon Walker-Samuel; James A d'Arcy; David J Hawkes; David Atkinson; Martin O Leach Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2007-04-10 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: David A Reiter; Remigio A Roque; Ping-Chang Lin; Onyi Irrechukwu; Stephen Doty; Dan L Longo; Nancy Pleshko; Richard G Spencer Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-11-30 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: David A Reiter; Remigio A Roque; Ping-Chang Lin; Stephen B Doty; Nancy Pleshko; Richard G Spencer Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2011-04-05 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Mustapha Bouhrara; Diana Y Lee; Abinand C Rejimon; Christopher M Bergeron; Richard G Spencer Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2018-08-18 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Mustapha Bouhrara; Jean-Marie Bonny; Beth G Ashinsky; Michael C Maring; Richard G Spencer Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Mustapha Bouhrara; David A Reiter; Hasan Celik; Kenneth W Fishbein; Richard Kijowski; Richard G Spencer Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-07-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Mustapha Bouhrara; David A Reiter; Kyle W Sexton; Christopher M Bergeron; Linda M Zukley; Richard G Spencer Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Matthew Kiely; Curtis Triebswetter; Luis E Cortina; Zhaoyuan Gong; Maryam H Alsameen; Richard G Spencer; Mustapha Bouhrara Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2021-11-20 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Mustapha Bouhrara; David A Reiter; Michael C Maring; Jean-Marie Bonny; Richard G Spencer Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2018-07-12 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Nikkita Khattar; Curtis Triebswetter; Matthew Kiely; Luigi Ferrucci; Susan M Resnick; Richard G Spencer; Mustapha Bouhrara Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 7.400