Literature DB >> 34139358

Investigation of the association between cerebral iron content and myelin content in normative aging using quantitative magnetic resonance neuroimaging.

Nikkita Khattar1, Curtis Triebswetter1, Matthew Kiely1, Luigi Ferrucci2, Susan M Resnick3, Richard G Spencer1, Mustapha Bouhrara4.   

Abstract

Myelin loss and iron accumulation are cardinal features of aging and various neurodegenerative diseases. Oligodendrocytes incorporate iron as a metabolic substrate for myelin synthesis and maintenance. An emerging hypothesis in Alzheimer's disease research suggests that myelin breakdown releases substantial stores of iron that may accumulate, leading to further myelin breakdown and neurodegeneration. We assessed associations between iron content and myelin content in critical brain regions using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on a cohort of cognitively unimpaired adults ranging in age from 21 to 94 years. We measured whole-brain myelin water fraction (MWF), a surrogate of myelin content, using multicomponent relaxometry, and whole-brain iron content using susceptibility weighted imaging in all individuals. MWF was negatively associated with iron content in most brain regions evaluated indicating that lower myelin content corresponds to higher iron content. Moreover, iron content was significantly higher with advanced age in most structures, with men exhibiting a trend towards higher iron content as compared to women. Finally, relationship between MWF and age, in all brain regions investigated, suggests that brain myelination continues until middle age, followed by degeneration at older ages. This work establishes a foundation for further investigations of the etiology and sequelae of myelin breakdown and iron accumulation in neurodegeneration and may lead to new imaging markers for disease progression and treatment.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Iron; Myelin; Quantitative MRI

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34139358      PMCID: PMC8370037          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   7.400


Introduction

Iron is involved in several biological processes that are paramount for normal neurologic function, including oxygen transportation, mito-chondrial respiration, oxidative phosphorylation, and synthesis of neurotransmitters. In addition, it is an essential cofactor for enzymatic activity related to myelin production and maintenance. Oligodendrocytes, the cells that produce myelin, are the main iron-containing cells of the CNS and incorporate iron as a substrate for myelin production (Todorich et al., 2009; Möller et al., 2019). The importance of iron for myelin production has been demonstrated through observations of demyelination accompanying decreased dietary iron (Ortiz et al., 2004; Hare et al., 2013; Stankiewicz et al., 2014), and the fact that in animal models, injection of ferritin, the main iron storage protein, into white matter promotes oligodendrogenesis (Schonberg et al., 2012; Schonberg and McTigue, 2009). However, studies have also shown that iron may accumulate in several brain regions with aging. If iron homeostasis is not maintained, excess iron has the potential to catalyze free radical reactions; this promotes oxidative damage of brain tissue, ultimately potentiating impairments in cognition and behavior (Ghadery et al., 2015; Emerit et al., 2001; Hallgren and Sourander, 1958). Indeed, it has been shown that dysregulation of iron homeostasis is a critical feature of various neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), and Huntington’s disease (Lane et al., 2018; Mills et al., 2010). An emerging hypothesis in AD research, put forward by Bartzokis et al., suggests that myelin breakdown and degeneration of oligodendrocytes release substantial stores of iron that, absent appropriate clearance, may accumulate in the brain leading to further myelin and tissue damage including neurodegeneration (Möller et al., 2019; Hallgren and Sourander, 1958; Bartzokis, 2004; Bartzokis, 2011; Bartzokis et al., 2003; Bartzokis et al., 2004; G Bartzokis et al., 2007; Bartzokis et al., 2000). This paradigm is increasingly supported by preclinical and clinical studies demonstrating substantial iron release from damaged myelin sheets or oligodendrocytes (Heidari et al., 2016; SE Nasrabady et al., 2018). Further, in a recent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study of animals and humans, it has been shown that mutations within the hemochromatosis gene, which results in increased iron overload, lead to white matter degradation; this was interpreted as a direct consequence of demyelination (Meadowcroft et al., 2016). Moreover, Hametner and colleagues, in their immunohistochemistry study of iron distribution and expression of iron-related proteins in human brain tissue affected by multiple sclerosis (MS) (Hametner et al., 2013), have shown that in active MS lesions, iron was released from dying oligodendrocytes resulting in extracellular accumulation of iron which leads to cell degeneration (Haider, 2015). Further, Steiger and colleagues have demonstrated that ventral striatum iron accumulation is linked to demyelination and impairments in declarative memory in healthy young and elderly participants (Steiger et al., 2016). Notwithstanding these findings, the association between myelin breakdown and cerebral iron accumulation in normal aging requires further investigation. MRI provides a unique tool to quantify, in-vivo, iron and myelin contents. Ferritin and neuromelanin polymer pigments are the main reservoirs of iron in the human brain. Inside these complexes, iron forms aggregates that lead, in the presence of an external magnetic field, to the creation of strong magnetic susceptibility inhomogeneities and consequent local field distortions. These distortions are detectable at submillimeter resolution using various susceptibility-sensitive MRI techniques, such as susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) (EM Haacke et al., 2009). In SWI, iron depositions exhibit negative regional phase, resulting in decreased image intensity in the vicinity of iron (Wang et al., 2012; Pfefferbaum et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2008; Haacke et al., 2004; Haacke et al., 2007). SWI, and its advanced version, namely, quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), have been shown to be sensitive techniques for investigating age-dependent iron deposition in normal aging, neurodegeneration, and dementia (Wang et al., 2012; Pfefferbaum et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2008; C Liu et al., 2015; Sehgal et al., 2005; EM Haacke et al., 2009; Harder et al., 2008; van der Weijden et al., 2019; Acosta-Cabronero et al., 2016; Betts et al., 2016; Keuken et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2018; Bilgic et al., 2012; Lin et al., 2015; Killiany et al., 2020; Li et al., 2021; Darki et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2021). Furthermore, MRI mapping of myelin water fraction (MWF), a proxy of myelin content, provides important insights for understanding brain maturation and neurodegeneration (Bouhrara and Spencer, 2016; MacKay and Laule, 2016; Whittall et al., 1997; Does, 2018; Alonso-Ortiz et al., 2015; Piredda et al., 2021; MacKay et al., 1994; Vavasour et al., 2006). Advanced analysis methods based on multicomponent relaxometry have been introduced to improve both sensitivity and specificity of MR-based myelin quantification (Bouhrara and Spencer, 2016; MacKay and Laule, 2016; Whittall et al., 1997; Does, 2018; Alonso-Ortiz et al., 2015; Piredda et al., 2021; Jones et al., 2003; Prasloski et al., 2012; Bonny et al., 2020; M Bouhrara et al., 2021; Bouhrara et al., 2015); these methods have been extensively applied to characterize cerebral demyelinating diseases and neurodevelopment (MacKay and Laule, 2016; Borich et al., 2013; Laule et al., 2006; Sirrs et al., 2007; Kolind et al., 2012; Kolind et al., 2015; Dean et al., 2017; Dean et al., 2014; Dean et al., 2016; Deoni et al., 2012; M Bouhrara et al., 2020; M Bouhrara et al., 2020; Bouhrara et al., 2018; M Bouhrara et al., 2020; Qian et al., 2020; Dvorak et al., 2021; Papadaki et al., 2019). Using MWF and QSM, Yao and colleagues have shown an association between focal iron accumulation and myelin loss in patients with chronic MS lesions (Yao et al., 2018). Using the same MRI techniques, Pu and colleagues have shown a negative correlation between myelin and iron content in the basal ganglia and in the connecting white matter fibers in macaques (Pu et al., 2020). These findings provide compelling support for the unique sensitivity and specificity of MRI-based approaches to quantify, in-vivo, myelin and iron, and shed light on the intimate relationship between myelin breakdown and iron deposition. We refer the reader to an excellent review by Möller and colleagues of the clinical role of multiparametric MR imaging in quantifying local iron and myelin content as emerging important biomarkers for white matter and cerebral tissue integrity (Möller et al., 2019). In this work, we investigate the regional associations between iron content and myelin content in normative aging of the human brain using advanced quantitative MR neuroimaging. For mapping myelin, we use the Bayesian Monte-Carlo analysis of multicomponent driven equilibrium steady-state observation of T1 and T2 (BMC-mcDESPOT) method, developed in our laboratory and applied extensively (Bouhrara and Spencer, 2016; M Bouhrara et al., 2021; M Bouhrara et al., 2020; M Bouhrara et al., 2020; Bouhrara et al., 2018; M Bouhrara et al., 2020; Qian et al., 2020; Bouhrara et al., 2016; Bouhrara and Spencer, 2015; Bouhrara and Spencer, 2017; M Bouhrara et al., 2021; M Bouhrara et al., 2017; M Bouhrara et al., 2017). Iron content is measured using our implementation of high-resolution SWI. Our study is conducted on a cohort of 92 well-characterized healthy adults over an age range of 21 to 94 years, with the main goal of developing further insights into the biochemical mechanisms of iron deposition in the human brain.

Material & methods

Participants

Participants were drawn from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA) (Shock, 1985; Ferrucci, 2008), and the Genetic and Epigenetic Signatures of Translational Aging Laboratory Testing (GESTALT) study. The study populations, experimental design, and measurement protocols of the BLSA have been previously reported (Shock, 1985; Ferrucci, 2008). The BLSA is a longitudinal cohort study funded and conducted by the NIA Intramural Research Program (IRP). Established in 1958, the BLSA enrolls community-dwelling adults with no major chronic conditions or functional impairments at enrollment. The GESTALT study is also a study of healthy volunteers, initiated in 2015, and funded and conducted by the NIA IRP. The goal of the BLSA and GESTALT studies is to evaluate multiple biomarkers related to aging. We note that the inclusion and exclusion criteria for these two studies are essentially identical. Participants underwent testing at the NIA’s clinical research unit and were excluded if they had metallic implants, or major neurologic or medical disorders. All participants underwent a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). Seven participants with cognitive impairment were excluded from the analysis. The final cohort consisted of 92 cognitively unimpaired volunteers (mean ± standard deviation MMSE = 28.6 ± 1.7) ranging in age from 21 to 94 years (54.3 ± 22.3 years) of which 50 were men (56.4 ± 23.8 years) and 42 were women (51.8 ± 20.3 years). Age (p >.05) and MMSE (p >.05) did not differ significantly between men and women. The number of participants per age-decade was: 12 (7 women) within 20–29 years, 15 (5 women) within 30–39 years, 26 (15 women) within 40–49 years, 4 (1 woman) within 50–59 years, 4 (3 women) within 60–69 years, 12 (5 women) within 70– 79 years, 16 (6 women) within 80–89 years, and 3 (0 woman) within 90–99 years. Experimental procedures were performed in compliance with our local Institutional Review Board, and participants provided written informed consent.

MR imaging

MRI scans were performed on a 3T whole body Philips MRI system (Achieva, Best, The Netherlands) using the internal quadrature body coil for transmission and an eight-channel phased-array head coil for reception. For each participant, the imaging protocol was as follow: BMC-mcDESPOT for MWF mapping (Bouhrara and Spencer, 2016; Bouhrara et al., 2016; Bouhrara and Spencer, 2015; Bouhrara and Spencer, 2017): 3D spoiled gradient recalled echo (SPGR) images were acquired with flip angles (FAs) of [2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20]°, echo time (TE) of 1.37 ms, repetition time (TR) of 5 ms, bandwidth (BW) of 1478 Hz/pixel, and acquisition time of ~5 min. In addition, 3D balanced steady state free precession (bSSFP) images were acquired with FAs of [2 4 7 11 16 24 32 40 50 60]°, TE of 2.8 ms, TR of 5.8 ms, BW of 1918 Hz/pixel, and acquisition time of ~6 min. The bSSFP images were acquired with radiofrequency (RF) excitation pulse phase increments of 0 or π in order to account for off-resonance effects (Deoni, 2011). All SPGR and bSSFP images were acquired with an acquisition matrix of 150 × 130 × 94, voxel size of 1.6 mm × 1.6 mm × 1.6 mm, and 94 slices. TEs and TRs were set to the minimum values to improve detection of the signal from the rapidly relaxing component of myelin water and to reduce the total acquisition time, while the FA values were based on suggested values from literature as well as on our extensive simulation analyses conducted previously to define the set of FAs required to maximize accuracy and precision in derived MWF values (Bouhrara and Spencer, 2016; Bouhrara et al., 2016; Bouhrara and Spencer, 2015; Bouhrara and Spencer, 2017; Deoni, 2011; Deoni et al., 2013; Deoni et al., 2008). Further, we used the double-angle method (DAM) to correct for excitation RF inhomogeneity (Stollberger and Wach, 1996). For that, two fast spin-echo images were acquired with FAs of 45° and 90°, TE of 102 ms, TR of 3000 ms, acquisition voxel size of 2.6 mm × 2.6 mm × 4 mm, 38 slices, and acquisition time of ~4 min. All images were acquired with a field-of-view (FoV) of 240 mm × 208 mm × 150 mm. The total acquisition time was ~21 min. SWI for iron content mapping (Wang et al., 2012; Pfefferbaum et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2008; C Liu et al., 2015): 3D single-echo SW image was acquired using a gradient-echo sequence with flow compensation, FoV of 240 mm x 240 mm x 185 mm, voxel size of 0.64 mm × 0.64 mm × 0.64 mm, 290 slices, EPI-factor of 15, TR of 47 ms, TE of 27 ms, and 2 signal averages. The total acquisition time was ~3 min. Both magnitude and phase images were saved. All images were acquired with a SENSE factor of 2 and reconstructed to a voxel size of 1 mm × 1 mm × 1 mm. We emphasize that all MRI studies and ancillary measurements were performed with the same MRI system, running the same pulse sequences, at the same facility, and directed by the same principal investigator for both BLSA and GESTALT participants.

Image processing

After thorough visual inspection of data quality for each participant, the scalp, ventricles, and other nonparenchymal regions within the images were eliminated using the BET tool as implemented in the FSL software (Smith, 2002). For each participant, using FSL (Jenkinson et al., 2012), all SPGR, bSSFP, or DAM images were linearly registered to the SPGR image obtained at FA of 8° and the respective derived transformation matrices were then applied to the original SPGR, bSSFP, or DAM images. Then, a whole-brain MWF map was generated using BMC-mcDESPOT from these co-registered SPGR, bSSFP, and DAM datasets (Bouhrara and Spencer, 2016; Bouhrara et al., 2018; Bouhrara and Spencer, 2015; Bouhrara and Spencer, 2017), while a whole-brain SWI phase map was generated using the phase and magnitude SWI dataset (Wang et al., 2012; Pfefferbaum et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2008; C Liu et al., 2015) (Fig. 1). Using the FSL software, the averaged SPGR image over FAs was nonlinearly registered to the MNI atlas, and the computed transformation matrix was then applied to the corresponding MWF map. Similarly, the magnitude SWI image was nonlinearly registered to the MNI atlas, and the computed transformation matrix was then applied to the corresponding SWI phase map (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.

Diagram of the A) SWI phase mapping and B) MWF mapping, and registration workflow.

Twenty white matter (WM) and deep gray matter (DGM) regions of interest (ROIs) within the cerebrum were defined from the MNI atlas. Twelve WM regions were defined from the Johns Hopkins University (JHU) ICM-DTI-81 atlas encompassing the entire brain, the frontal, parietal, temporal and occipital lobes, as well as the corpus callosum, internal capsules, cerebellum, forceps, fronto-occipital fasciculus and longitudinal fasciculus, while eight DGM regions were defined encompassing the hippocampus, amygdala, caudate, thalamus, putamen, red nucleus, insula, substantia nigra and globus pallidus (Fig. 3), corresponding to regions previously identified in studies of cerebral iron or myelin content, as the focus of our investigation (Steiger et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2012; Pfefferbaum et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2008; M Bouhrara et al., 2020; Dvorak et al., 2021; Aquino et al., 2009; Persson et al., 2015; Faizy et al., 2018; Faizy et al., 2020; Uddin et al., 2019; J Zhang et al., 2015; Arshad et al., 2016). Mean SWI phase and MWF values were calculated for each ROI; these regional measures are provided in the Supplementary Material. In the SWI phase maps, regions with strong magnetic susceptibility or high iron concentration are surrounded by bright areas or rims exhibiting abnormally high phase values (Pfefferbaum et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2008). Therefore, to avoid introducing bias into derived mean SWI phase values, voxels belonging to these regions were excluded, as per conventional practice (Pfefferbaum et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2008), through application of a signal intensity threshold (Fig. 2). Furthermore, all ROIs were eroded to avoid partial volume bias from adjacent structures or from the edges of the brain which are affected by strong air-tissue magnetic susceptibility interfaces.
Fig. 3.

Visualization of the white matter and deep gray matter ROIs investigated in our analysis. 1) Frontal lobes, 2) Parietal lobes, 3) Occipital lobes, 4) Cerebellum, 5) Corpus callosum, 6) Internal capsules, 7) Temporal lobes, 8) Insula, 9) Caudate, 10) Putamen, 11) Thalamus, 12) Forceps, 13) Globus pallidus, 14) Red nucleus, 15) Substantia nigra, 16) Longitudinal fasciculus, 17) Fronto-occipital fasciculus, 18) Amygdala, and 19) Hippocampus.

Fig. 2.

Examples of SWI phase maps before (original) and after signal thresholding. A threshold was applied to discard abnormally high phase values seen in areas with strong magnetic susceptibility or high iron concentration. Black voxels represent the discarded areas. Results are shown for three different slices.

Statistical analyses

To investigate the effects of age and sex on SWI phase, multilinear regression was applied using the mean SWI phase within each ROI as the dependent variable and sex and age as the independent variables. In all cases, the interaction term between sex and age was found to be non-significant and was therefore omitted from the final model. A similar analysis was performed to assess the effects of age and sex on MWF, with mean MWF within each ROI as the dependent variable and sex, age, and age2 as the independent variables, after mean age centering. The inclusion of age2 as an independent variable is based on our and others’ recent observations that MWF follows a quadratic relationship with age (M Bouhrara et al., 2020; M Bouhrara et al., 2020; Qian et al., 2020; Dvorak et al., 2021; Arshad et al., 2016). In all cases, interaction terms between sex and age or sex and age2 were found to be non-significant and were therefore omitted from the final model. Finally, as the main focus of this work, we investigated the association between SWI phase and MWF using multilinear regression, with the mean SWI phase within each ROI as the dependent variable and the MWF within the ROI, age, and sex as the independent variables. For all analyses, the threshold for statistical significance was p <.05 after correction for multiple ROI comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) method (Benjamini, 2010; Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995). All calculations were performed with MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA).

Results

Age and sex effects on iron and myelin contents

Fig. 4 shows SWI phase and MWF maps for representative participants of three different ages. Results are shown for two representative axial slices covering the main brain structures investigated. Visual inspection indicates lower SWI phase values at higher ages, while MWF exhibited a quadratic, inverted U-shape, association with age; this is attributed to the process of myelination from youth through middle age, followed by demyelination afterward. Furthermore, we note that different regions exhibit different patterns of association between SWI phase or MWF and age, as expected.
Fig. 4.

SWI phase and MWF maps derived from the brains of three men participants of different ages. For each participant, results are shown for two representative slices.

Fig. 5 shows quantitative results for mean SWI phase values from all participants as a function of age for the indicated 20 WM and DGM cerebral regions. These results show lower mean SWI phase, that is, higher iron content, with age in most examined ROIs (p <.05, FDR corrected), except the red nucleus, the globus pallidus, and the substantia nigra which showed no trend with age (Table 1). The best-fit curves indicate that while the fundamental linear decreasing relationship between mean SWI phase and age was consistent across most of the ROIs, there was, as expected, some regional variation. The steepest negative slopes in SWI phase with age were found in the caudate, putamen, and internal capsule regions, while the smallest slopes were found in the temporal and parietal lobes. In addition, the lowest mean SWI phase values across age, that is, the highest iron content, were found in the DGM ROIs, namely, the caudate, thalamus, putamen, red nucleus, insula, substantia nigra and globus pallidus, while the highest SWI phase values, that is, the lowest iron content values, were found in the WM ROIs, especially the temporal lobe and cerebellum. Finally, the effect of sex on SWI phase was not significant in any of the cerebral regions investigated (Table 1), although in most ROIs, men exhibited nonsignificant trends toward lower SWI phase values, that is, greater iron content, than women (Table 1).
Fig. 5.

Regressions of SWI phase with age (N = 92). Results are shown for twenty WM and DGM brain structures. The coefficient of determination, R, and the significance, p-value (FDR corrected), of the multiple linear regression model are as shown. Most ROIs exhibited significant negative correlations between SWI phase, that is, positive correlations between iron content, and age.

Table 1

Slope, β, and significance, p, of the regression terms incorporated in the multiple linear regression given by: SWI phase . All p-values presented are obtained after FDR correction. Underlined p-values indicate close to significance before FDR correction.

SWI phase

AgeSex


βage (× 10−4) p age βsex(× 10−3) p sex

WB−1.39 < 0.01 −0.27> 0.1
FL−1.40 < 0.01 0.32> 0.1
OL−1.93 < 0.01 0.28> 0.1
PL−1.10 < 0.01 −0.85> 0.1
TL−1.09 < 0.01 −0.14> 0.1
CRB−1.81 < 0.01 −1.19> 0.1
CC−1.58 < 0.01 −2.15> 0.1
IC−3.86 < 0.01 −2.31> 0.1
FOR−1.37 < 0.01 −1.39> 0.1
FOF−2.31 < 0.01 −3.100.1
LF−1.55 < 0.01 0.08> 0.1
Hip−3.03 < 0.01 −4.130.1
CN−5.66> 0.1−7.76> 0.1
Put−4.09> 0.11.18> 0.1
Th−3.59 < 0.01 −1.25> 0.1
Am−3.45 < 0.01 −1.86> 0.1
RN1.43> 0.14.75> 0.1
SN3.88< 0.13.99> 0.1
GP−2.86> 0.123.560.1
Ins−1.89 < 0.01 −0.56> 0.1

SWI: susceptibility weighted imaging, WB: whole brain, FL: frontal lobes, PL: parietal lobes, TL: temporal lobes, OL: occipital lobes, CRB: cerebellum, CC: corpus callosum, IC: internal capsules, FOR: forceps, FOF: fronto-occipital fasciculus, LF: longitudinal fasciculus, Hip: hippocampus, CN: caudate nucleus, Put: putamen, Th: thalamus, Am: amygdala, RN: red nucleus, SN: substantia nigra, GP: globus pallidus, Ins: insula. Bold indicates significance (p <.05) or close to significance (p <.1).

Fig. 6 shows quantitative results for MWF values from all participants as a function of age for the 20 indicated WM and DGM cerebral regions. Unlike mean SWI phase, MWF vs. age exhibits nonlinear trends increasing until middle age and decreasing afterward in most ROIs examined. The best-fit curves indicate that while the fundamental inverted U-shaped relationship between MWF and age was consistent across all ROIs, this relationship displayed regional variation. Significant age effects on MWF were observed in all the brain regions evaluated, except the caudate, putamen, substantia nigra, amygdala and hippocampus ROIs (Table 2), with reduced MWF with advancing age. The steepest decline of MWF with age was found in the corpus callosum while the slowest decline was seen in the internal capsules. Similarly, the quadratic effect of age, age2, was significant in all brain structures evaluated (Table 2). Furthermore, as expected, the highest MWF values were found in the WM ROIs, with the DGM ROIs exhibiting overall lower MWF values. Finally, the effect of sex on MWF was not significant in any of the cerebral regions investigated (Table 2). In most ROIs, men exhibited nonsignificant trends towards higher MWF values, that is, greater myelin content, than women (Table 2).
Fig. 6.

Regional myelin water fraction (MWF) trends as a function of age (N = 92). Results are shown for twenty WM and DGM brain structures. For each ROI, the coefficient of determination, R and the significance, p-value (FDR corrected), of the multiple linear regression model are as shown. All regions investigated show significant inverted U-shaped trends of MWF with age, with differences in detail between regions.

Table 2

Slope, β, and significance, p, of the regression terms incorporated in the multiple linear regression given by: MWF . All p-values presented are obtained after FDR correction. Underlined p-values indicate close to significance before FDR correction.

MWF

AgeAge2Sex



βage(× 10−4) p age βage2(× 10−5) p age 2 βsex(× 10−3) p sex

WB− 3.93 < 0.01 − 3.12 < 0.01 1.32> 0.1
FL− 2.87 < 0.01 − 2.26 < 0.01 1.06> 0.1
OL− 1.01 < 0.01 − 2.77 < 0.01 0.26> 0.1
PL− 2.75 < 0.01 − 2.47 < 0.01 − 1.13> 0.1
TL− 1.58 < 0.01 − 2.33 < 0.01 0.41> 0.1
CRB− 0.79 < 0.01 − 1.92 < 0.01 5.74> 0.1
CC− 5.22 < 0.01 − 2.73< 0.01− 2.52> 0.1
IC− 4.57 < 0.01 − 2.96< 0.012.03> 0.1
FOR− 3.73 < 0.01 − 2.74< 0.011.18> 0.1
FOF− 4.57 < 0.01 − 3.36< 0.014.57> 0.1
LF− 4.28 < 0.01 − 3.29< 0.012.93> 0.1
Hip− 0.12> 0.1− 0.80< 0.056.390.1
CN− 1.42> 0.1− 1.95 < 0.01 3.59> 0.1
Put− 2.21> 0.1− 3.43 < 0.01 6.41> 0.1
Th− 4.03 < 0.01 − 2.32< 0.018.14> 0.1
Am0.04> 0.1− 0.81< 0.052.91> 0.1
RN− 2.01 < 0.01 − 2.72< 0.01− 0.90> 0.1
SN0.48> 0.1− 3.16< 0.01− 0.06> 0.1
GP− 2.42 < 0.05 − 2.33 < 0.05 − 1.27> 0.1
Ins− 0.89 < 0.01 − 1.54 < 0.01 2.50> 0.1

MWF: myelin water fraction, WB: whole brain, FL: frontal lobes, PL: parietal lobes, TL: temporal lobes, OL: occipital lobes, CRB: cerebellum, CC: corpus callosum, IC: internal capsules, FOR: forceps, FOF: fronto-occipital fasciculus, LF: longitudinal fasciculus, Hip: hippocampus, CN: caudate nucleus, Put: putamen, Th: thalamus, Am: amygdala, RN: red nucleus, SN: substantia nigra, GP: globus pallidus, Ins: insula. Bold indicates significance (p <.05) or close to significance (p <.1).

Association between iron content and myelin content

Fig. 7 shows the results of the regressions of SWI phase with MWF, after adjusting for age and sex, for the 20 indicated WM and DGM cerebral regions studied. As seen, lower MWF, that is, lower myelin content, corresponds to lower SWI phase values, that is, higher iron content, in most ROIs examined, with the best-fit curves displaying regional variation. Our statistical analysis, presented in Table 3, shows that the relationship between MWF and SWI phase was significant (p <.05) or close to significance (p <.1) in all brain regions, except in the occipital lobes, cerebellum, caudate, insula, putamen, and fronto-occipital fasciculus ROIs. In addition, the steepest positive slopes in SWI phase with MWF were found in the amygdala and hippocampus, while the smallest slopes were found in the cerebellum, putamen, and occipital lobes (Table 3).
Fig. 7.

Regressions of SWI phase with MWF (N = 92) adjusted for age and sex. Results are shown for twenty WM and DGM brain structures. The coefficient of determination, R and the significance, p-value, of the multiple linear regression model are as shown. All ROIs exhibited significant positive correlations between SWI phase and MWF indicating that lower MWF corresponds to lower SWI phase, that is, higher iron content.

Table 3

Slope, β, and significance, p, of the regression terms incorporated in the multiple linear regression given by: SWI . All p-values presented are obtained after FDR correction. Underlined p-values indicate close-to-significance before FDR correction and double-underlined p-values indicate significance before FDR correction.

SWI phase

AgeMWFSex



βage (× 10−4) p age βMWF(× 10−2) p MWF βsex(× 10−3) p sex

WB− 1.23 < 0.01 2.44 < 0.05 − 0.21> 0.1
FL− 1.13 < 0.01 5.96 < 0.05 0.42> 0.1
OL− 1.86 < 0.01 2.03> 0.10.35> 0.1
PL− 0.93 < 0.01 3.58 < 0.05 − 0.70> 0.1
TL− 0.84 < 0.01 7.55 < 0.05 − 0.04> 0.1
CRB− 1.78 < 0.01 1.39> 0.1− 1.24> 0.1
CC− 1.34 < 0.01 3.32< 0.05− 0.02> 0.1
IC− 3.19 < 0.01 10.10< 0.05− 2.17> 0.1
FOR− 1.16 < 0.01 3.76 < 0.05 − 0.06> 0.1
FOF− 2.04 < 0.01 3.94> 0.1− 3.120.1
LF− 1.31 < 0.01 3.51 < 0.05 − 0.11> 0.1
Hip− 2.92 < 0.01 15.74< 0.1− 5.00> 0.1
CN− 5.66> 0.12.62> 0.1− 0.08> 0.1
Put− 4.09> 0.11.84> 0.11.14> 0.1
Th− 3.07 < 0.01 9.17 < 0.05 − 1.75> 0.1
Am− 3.32 < 0.01 25.25 < 0.05 − 2.18> 0.1
RN0.74> 0.1− 17.39 < 0.1 4.04> 0.1
SN3.220.1− 36.00 < 0.05 2.62> 0.1
GP− 1.15> 0.139.25 < 0.05 25.57> 0.1
Ins− 1.77 < 0.01 5.13> 0.1− 0.04> 0.1

SWI: susceptibility weighted imaging, WB: whole brain, FL: frontal lobes, PL: parietal lobes, TL: temporal lobes, OL: occipital lobes, CRB: cerebellum, CC: corpus callosum, IC: internal capsules, FOR: forceps, FOF: fronto-occipital fasciculus, LF: longitudinal fasciculus, Hip: hippocampus, CN: caudate nucleus, Put: putamen, Th: thalamus, Am: amygdala, RN: red nucleus, SN: substantia nigra, GP: globus pallidus, Ins: insula. Bold indicates significance (p <.05) or close to significance (p <.1).

Discussion

Using advanced MR methodology for myelin and iron content quantification, we demonstrate significant associations between iron content or myelin content with age in a cohort of healthy volunteers. Further, our results indicate significant negative associations between iron content and myelin content; these associations were statistically significant in various critical brain regions, even after adjusting for age and sex. While these results do not confirm a causal link between iron deposition and myelin breakdown, they provide further evidence of a potential link between iron neurochemistry and myelin integrity in aging adults. Our results indicate linear associations between iron content and age in all WM and DGM regions investigated (Table 1, Fig. 5) and confirm the significant effects of age on brain iron levels (Hallgren and Sourander, 1958; Wang et al., 2012; Pfefferbaum et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2008; Acosta-Cabronero et al., 2016; Persson et al., 2015; Ramos et al., 2014; Daugherty and Raz, 2015; Haacke et al., 2010). These findings are consistent with previous reports, indicating overall trends of lower SWI phase values, that is, higher iron content, with age in several WM and DGM regions (Wang et al., 2012; Pfefferbaum et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2008). Our results show that the rates of iron deposition varied across cerebral structures, in agreement with several previous in-vivo and post-mortem studies (Hallgren and Sourander, 1958; Pfefferbaum et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2008; Aquino et al., 2009) (Table 1). Indeed, we found that age-differences in iron concentration in the globus pallidus, red nucleus, putamen, and caudate were not significant (Xu et al., 2008; Acosta-Cabronero et al., 2016; Aquino et al., 2009). Studies have also suggested that iron accumulation in these structures is nonlinear over time, with iron levels approaching a distinct plateau in middle age (Hallgren and Sourander, 1958; Xu et al., 2008; Aquino et al., 2009). Finally, our data showed that there were no sex related differences in iron content in any of the regions studied, although men exhibited nonsignificant trends of higher iron content than women (Table 1); this agrees with previous observations (Xu et al., 2008; Persson et al., 2015; G Bartzokis et al., 2007). However, the literature regarding sex differences in iron content remains sparse (Xu et al., 2008), with larger cohort studies required for further definition of this potential effect. Our results indicate a quadratic association between MWF and age in all cerebral regions investigated (Table 2, Fig. 6). These results are consistent with our and previous reports, on larger cohorts of cognitively unimpaired participants, indicating an inverted U-shape trend of MWF values with age in several white matter regions (M Bouhrara et al., 2020; Dvorak et al., 2021; Papadaki et al., 2019; Arshad et al., 2016). This quadratic association between myelin and age is attributed to the process of progressive myelination from youth through middle age, followed by demyelination in later years (Arshad et al., 2016; Bartzokis et al., 2010); this pattern is in agreement with postmortem observations (Peters, 2002; Tang et al., 1997) and with several studies based on myelin-sensitive MRI methods such as diffusion tensor imaging and relaxation rates (Bartzokis et al., 2010; Okubo et al., 2017; Westlye et al., 2010; Yeatman et al., 2014; Slater et al., 2019). As expected, our results show variation among brain regions. The DGM structures exhibited the steepest slope in the relationship between iron content and myelination (Table 3, Fig. 7). Postmortem and in vivo studies have shown large amounts of iron in the basal ganglia in cognitively unimpaired individuals (Möller et al., 2019; Hallgren and Sourander, 1958; Bartzokis et al., 2000; Wang et al., 2012; Pfefferbaum et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2008; Ramos et al., 2014; G Bartzokis et al., 2007; Griffiths and Crossman, 1993; Bartzokis et al., 1994; Ogg et al., 1999; Loeffler et al., 1995; Ward et al., 2014). Indeed, iron is stored in the ferritin protein which is present in high concentration in the basal ganglia (Griffiths and Crossman, 1993; Griffiths et al., 1999). However, our results must be interpreted with caution. It has been shown that diffusion of iron into the extracellular space may decrease the relaxation times of the unbound water pool, leading to an artificial overestimation of MWF values with increasing iron content (Birkl et al., 2019); this could explain the opposite trends seen in the substantia nigra, caudate and red nucleus (Fig. 5), which are known to exhibit the highest iron concentrations in the human brain. However, in spite of this potential effect, our results in fact show lower MWF with higher iron content. This indicates that a physiologic association of demyelination with increased iron content dominates this potential source of error in many of the ROIs examined. However, overestimation of MWF due to iron may be responsible for rendering the association nonsignificant in other ROIs despite consistent trends in the direction of this association. Ongoing studies incorporating additional subjects, longitudinal follow up, and histological measures will provide further insight into these phenomena. The relationship between local iron content and myelination may provide important insight into their roles in neurodegenerative diseases, especially given the vulnerability of oligodendrocyte metabolism to iron neurotoxicity. A powerful argument has emerged incorporating impaired myelin homeostasis as a central phenomenon in the pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). This concept, introduced by Bartzokis and colleagues (Bartzokis, 2004; Bartzokis, 2011; Bartzokis et al., 2004; G Bartzokis et al., 2007), suggests that myelin breakdown releases iron which promotes the development of amyloid plaques, which in turn destroy additional myelin. However, myelin and the oligodendrocytes that produce it are vulnerable to the accumulation of amyloid-β protein, tau protein, or iron (Dean et al., 2017; Bradl and Lassmann, 2010; SE Nasrabady et al., 2018; Desai et al., 2010). Consequent loss of oligodendrocytes or impairment of their metabolic synthetic function in the setting of AD, and possibly other dementias, may therefore result in focal myelination deficits. These deficits may in turn serve as the pathophysiologic basis of decreased interregional connectivity in the central nervous system (CNS) and subsequent decreased cognitive ability, as well as other deficits in CNS function. This myelin paradigm is supported by clinical MRI studies showing decreases in myelin content in the setting of AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (Bouhrara et al., 2018; Carmeli et al., 2013; van der Flier et al., 2002; Arfanakis et al., 2007; Kabani et al., 2002; Gold et al., 2012; Haris et al., 2009). Furthermore, growing evidence indicates decreases in myelin production with decreased dietary iron (Ortiz et al., 2004; Hare et al., 2013; Stankiewicz et al., 2014). All these considerations led us to the plausible hypothesis of an association between iron content and myelin content. These studies, our previous report providing evidence of myelin loss in MCI and dementia (Bouhrara et al., 2018) and our current findings motivate our ongoing studies of the relationship between iron accumulation and myelin loss in MCI and dementia, including longitudinal studies designed to evaluate the temporal relationship between demyelination and iron deposition. If confirmed, this would establish a therapeutic target for AD prevention, namely, maintenance of iron homeostasis through pharmacological treatments, such as iron chelation or dietary interventions. In addition, correlations with symptomatology would serve to establish MWF and iron quantifications as biomarkers for the progression of AD. Although our work examines a relatively large cohort and uses advanced methodology, several limitations remain. Our dataset is cross-sectional, so that the iron and myelin associations observed here require further validation through longitudinal studies, which may provide insights regarding the causality of these associations. Such work, motivated by the present results, is underway. We also note that it was not feasible to obtain optimal uniform sampling across all age intervals in this sample of participants. In fact, the number of subjects included between 50 and 70 years is much lower as compared to the other age decades. This may also influence the overall interpretability of myelination or iron, as well as their associations, during the process of aging (Fjell et al., 2010). Nevertheless, we obtained a meaningful sample size across the age range of our study. Moreover, other metals such as manganese or copper can affect the measured MR signal. However, the concentration of these metals in the brain, under normal conditions, is extremely low so that the local phase distortions, as depicted in the SWI phase maps, are mainly due to iron. Moreover, our SWI analysis was based on a single-echo acquisition (Wang et al., 2012; Pfefferbaum et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2008). Further studies of the association between myelin and iron contents using more quantitative and advanced techniques, such as QSM for iron quantification, are needed (Langkammer et al., 2012; C Liu et al., 2015; Wang and Liu, 2015). Furthermore, although the susceptibility-weighted contrast in the brain is driven primarily by iron (Haacke et al., 2005; Yao et al., 2009; Hametner et al., 2018), myelin, whose elevated content in lipids and proteins renders its sheaths diamagnetic, may contribute to susceptibility contrast (Kor et al., 2019; Lee et al., 2012; Li et al., 2011); this may introduce some bias in derived SWI phase values. Histological studies are required to further explore this potential confounder. Moreover, as indicated above, it has been shown that diffusion of iron into the extracellular space may shorten the corresponding transverse relaxation time leading to an artificial overestimation of MWF values (Birkl et al., 2019; Drayer et al., 1986). Further ex-vivo or histological experiments are required to unambiguously elucidate the origin of this observation (Kirilina et al., 2020). Nevertheless, we note that since iron could lead to increases in derived MWF values while myelin sheets could lead to lower derived SWI phase values, a positive association between iron and MWF would be expected. In this case, these effects would be antagonist to our observation of regional negative associations between iron and MWF; this provides further support to our observation despite the aforementioned competing effects. Interestingly, positive or no associations between iron and MWF were observed in a few deep gray matter regions (DGM), including the red nucleus, substantia nigra and caudate; these structures exhibit very high iron concentrations. We conjecture that these positive associations found in these DGM regions are likely driven by a strong bias in derived MWF values due to a high iron concentration. In addition, fiber orientation effects may represent another factor that could bias iron and MWF estimates (Kor et al., 2019; Lee et al., 2010; Liu, 2010; Birkl et al., 2021). Another source of bias in derived MWF values is myelin debris from damaged myelin sheets. Indeed, myelin debris can be interpreted as intact myelin in multicomponent MRI analysis (Webb et al., 2003; McCreary et al., 2009; Kozlowski et al., 2008). Moreover, contamination due to partial volume issues may have been introduced in the calculated MWF or SWI values. To mitigate this contamination, all ROIs were eroded followed by careful visual inspections. Nevertheless, some partial volume effects could have persisted, especially in small structures including the deep gray matter ROIs. In addition, age-related tissue atrophy could lead to nonoptimal image registration, potentially introducing some bias in derived parameters values. Nevertheless, our visual inspection indicates that age-related tissue atrophy was limited to a very few participants belonging to the oldest age decade of our cohort. Finally, several physiological and experimental parameters could bias MWF determination. These include, but are not limited to, exchange between water pools (West et al., 2019; Kalantari et al., 2011; Myint and Ishima, 2009), magnetization transfer between free water protons and macromolecules (West et al., 2019; J Zhang et al., 2015), iron content (Birkl et al., 2019), internal gradients (Washburn et al., 2008; Seland et al., 2004), and differential signal attenuation due to water diffusion in underlying compartments (Ziener et al., 2010; Carney et al., 1991; Le Bihan et al., 1989), which are not considered in either the BMC-mcDESPOT formalism or the other MWF measurement methods available. The importance of these effects in a particular experiment will depend both on the specifics of the sample or subject under investigation and on the details of the pulse sequence, including the selection of parameters such as TE, TR, FA, RF pulse characteristics and gradient durations and amplitudes (Does, 2018; Alonso-Ortiz et al., 2015; Dvorak et al., 2021; Levesque et al., 2010; Lazari and Lipp, 2021; Bouhrara and Bonny, 2012). However, it must be emphasized that multi-spin echo-based MRI sequences, namely the Carr–Purcell–Meiboom–Gill sequence or its accelerated version, the gradient and spin echo sequence, remain the reference methods for MWF mapping (MacKay and Laule, 2016; Alonso-Ortiz et al., 2015; Piredda et al., 2021; Dvorak et al., 2021; Lazari and Lipp, 2021; Lee et al., 2021; Heath et al., 2018). This is likely due to the availability of these imaging sequences on most preclinical and clinical MRI systems, the simplicity of the signal model, and the extensive histological validation conducted over the last two decades (Laule et al., 2006; Laule et al., 2008). In this study, examining the association between local myelination and iron accumulation in the human cerebrum, we showed that higher iron content is associated with lower myelin content across a wide age range of cognitively normal subjects.
  151 in total

Review 1.  MRI-based myelin water imaging: A technical review.

Authors:  Eva Alonso-Ortiz; Ives R Levesque; G Bruce Pike
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Susceptibility-weighted imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the brain.

Authors:  Chunlei Liu; Wei Li; Karen A Tong; Kristen W Yeom; Samuel Kuzminski
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  So You Want to Image Myelin Using MRI: An Overview and Practical Guide for Myelin Water Imaging.

Authors:  Jongho Lee; Jae-Won Hyun; Jieun Lee; Eun-Jung Choi; Hyeong-Geol Shin; Kyeongseon Min; Yoonho Nam; Ho Jin Kim; Se-Hong Oh
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  MRI estimates of brain iron concentration in normal aging using quantitative susceptibility mapping.

Authors:  Berkin Bilgic; Adolf Pfefferbaum; Torsten Rohlfing; Edith V Sullivan; Elfar Adalsteinsson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Evidence of demyelination in mild cognitive impairment and dementia using a direct and specific magnetic resonance imaging measure of myelin content.

Authors:  Mustapha Bouhrara; David A Reiter; Christopher M Bergeron; Linda M Zukley; Luigi Ferrucci; Susan M Resnick; Richard G Spencer
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 21.566

6.  Ferritin stimulates oligodendrocyte genesis in the adult spinal cord and can be transferred from macrophages to NG2 cells in vivo.

Authors:  David L Schonberg; Evan Z Goldstein; Fatma Rezan Sahinkaya; Ping Wei; Phillip G Popovich; Dana M McTigue
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Characterizing iron deposition in multiple sclerosis lesions using susceptibility weighted imaging.

Authors:  E Mark Haacke; Malek Makki; Yulin Ge; Megha Maheshwari; Vivek Sehgal; Jiani Hu; Madeswaran Selvan; Zhen Wu; Zahid Latif; Yang Xuan; Omar Khan; James Garbern; Robert I Grossman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Myelin water imaging reflects clinical variability in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Shannon Kolind; Lucy Matthews; Heidi Johansen-Berg; M Isabel Leite; Steven C R Williams; Sean Deoni; Jackie Palace
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  A delicate balance: Iron metabolism and diseases of the brain.

Authors:  Dominic Hare; Scott Ayton; Ashley Bush; Peng Lei
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 10.  Magnetic Resonance of Myelin Water: An in vivo Marker for Myelin.

Authors:  Alex L MacKay; Cornelia Laule
Journal:  Brain Plast       Date:  2016-12-21
View more
  7 in total

1.  Differential associations between apolipoprotein E alleles and cerebral myelin content in normative aging.

Authors:  Curtis Triebswetter; Matthew Kiely; Nikkita Khattar; Luigi Ferrucci; Susan M Resnick; Richard G Spencer; Mustapha Bouhrara
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Insights into human cerebral white matter maturation and degeneration across the adult lifespan.

Authors:  Matthew Kiely; Curtis Triebswetter; Luis E Cortina; Zhaoyuan Gong; Maryam H Alsameen; Richard G Spencer; Mustapha Bouhrara
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Alterations in brain iron deposition with progression of late-life depression measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based quantitative susceptibility mapping.

Authors:  Fang Wang; Ming Zhang; Yan Li; Yufei Li; Hengfen Gong; Jun Li; Yuyao Zhang; Chencheng Zhang; Fuhua Yan; Bomin Sun; Naying He; Hongjiang Wei
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-07

4.  Brain oxygen extraction and neural tissue susceptibility are associated with cognitive impairment in older individuals.

Authors:  Gloria C Chiang; Junghun Cho; Jonathan Dyke; Hang Zhang; Qihao Zhang; Michael Tokov; Thanh Nguyen; Ilhami Kovanlikaya; Michael Amoashiy; Mony de Leon; Yi Wang
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.324

5.  Cortical iron mediates age-related decline in fluid cognition.

Authors:  Cortney M Howard; Shivangi Jain; Angela D Cook; Lauren E Packard; Hollie A Mullin; Nan-Kuei Chen; Chunlei Liu; Allen W Song; David J Madden
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Characteristics of systemic inflammation and brain iron deposition in Parkinson's disease patients.

Authors:  Jinghui Xu; Xiaofei He; Yunqi Xu; Xi Chen; Mingyue Li; Liying Zhang; Xiaodi Fu; Mengqiu Pan; Qun Wang; Xiquan Hu
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 4.511

Review 7.  Iron Metabolism in Aging and Age-Related Diseases.

Authors:  Yao Tian; Yuanliangzi Tian; Zhixiao Yuan; Yutian Zeng; Shuai Wang; Xiaolan Fan; Deying Yang; Mingyao Yang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.