Literature DB >> 25240063

Fluctuations of visual awareness: combining motion-induced blindness with binocular rivalry.

Katarzyna Jaworska1, Martin Lages2.   

Abstract

Binocular rivalry (BR) and motion-induced blindness (MIB) are two phenomena of visual awareness where perception alternates between multiple states despite constant retinal input. Both phenomena have been extensively studied, but the underlying processing remains unclear. It has been suggested that BR and MIB involve the same neural mechanism, but how the two phenomena compete for visual awareness in the same stimulus has not been systematically investigated. Here we introduce BR in a dichoptic stimulus display that can also elicit MIB and examine fluctuations of visual awareness over the course of each trial. Exploiting this paradigm we manipulated stimulus characteristics that are known to influence MIB and BR. In two experiments we found that effects on multistable percepts were incompatible with the idea of a common oscillator. The results suggest instead that local and global stimulus attributes can affect the dynamics of each percept differently. We conclude that the two phenomena of visual awareness share basic temporal characteristics but are most likely influenced by processing at different stages within the visual system.
© 2014 ARVO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  binocular rivalry; gamma distribution; motion-induced blindness; multistable; visual awareness; visual hierarchy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25240063      PMCID: PMC4168770          DOI: 10.1167/14.11.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  73 in total

1.  Motion-induced blindness in normal observers.

Authors:  Y S Bonneh; A Cooperman; D Sagi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-06-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Attention but not awareness modulates the BOLD signal in the human V1 during binocular suppression.

Authors:  Masataka Watanabe; Kang Cheng; Yusuke Murayama; Kenichi Ueno; Takeshi Asamizuya; Keiji Tanaka; Nikos Logothetis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Competition in bistable vision is attribute-specific.

Authors:  Jon K Grossmann; Allan C Dobbins
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Attentional control over either of the two competing percepts of ambiguous stimuli revealed by a two-parameter analysis: means do not make the difference.

Authors:  R van Ee; A J Noest; J W Brascamp; A V van den Berg
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Attention speeds binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Chris L E Paffen; David Alais; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-09

6.  Motion-aftereffect-induced blindness.

Authors:  Martin Lages; Wendy J Adams; Erich W Graf
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Surface organization influences bistable vision.

Authors:  Erich W Graf; Wendy J Adams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  A fresh look at the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  T J Mueller; R Blake
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  Perceptual and physiological evidence for a role for early visual areas in motion-induced blindness.

Authors:  Camilo Libedinsky; Tristram Savage; Margaret Livingstone
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Retinotopic patterns of correlated fluctuations in visual cortex reflect the dynamics of spontaneous perceptual suppression.

Authors:  Tobias H Donner; Dov Sagi; Yoram S Bonneh; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  2 in total

1.  Influence of Artificially Generated Interocular Blur Difference on Fusion Stability Under Vergence Stress.

Authors:  Miroslav Dostalek; Karel Fliegel; Ladislav Dusek; Tomas Lukes; Jan Hejda; Michaela Duchackova; Jiri Hozman; Rudolf Autrata
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 0.957

2.  Autistic Traits Are Not a Strong Predictor of Binocular Rivalry Dynamics.

Authors:  Katie M Wykes; Laila Hugrass; David P Crewther
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.677

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.