Literature DB >> 16650452

Attentional control over either of the two competing percepts of ambiguous stimuli revealed by a two-parameter analysis: means do not make the difference.

R van Ee1, A J Noest, J W Brascamp, A V van den Berg.   

Abstract

We studied distributions of perceptual rivalry reversals, as defined by the two fitted parameters of the Gamma distribution. We did so for a variety of bi-stable stimuli and voluntary control exertion tasks. Subjects' distributions differed from one another for a particular stimulus and control task in a systematic way that reflects a constraint on the describing parameters. We found a variety of two-parameter effects, the most important one being that distributions of subjects differ from one another in the same systematic way across different stimuli and control tasks (i.e., a fast switcher remains fast across all conditions in a parameter-specified way). The cardinal component of subject-dependent variation was not the conventionally used mean reversal rate, but a component that was oriented-for all stimuli and tasks-roughly perpendicular to the mean rate. For the Necker cube, we performed additional experiments employing specific variations in control exertion, suggesting that subjects have to a considerable extent independent control over the reversal rate of either of the two competing percepts.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16650452     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.03.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  14 in total

1.  Visual sensitivity underlying changes in visual consciousness.

Authors:  David Alais; John Cass; Robert P O'Shea; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Endogenous attention selection during binocular rivalry at early stages of visual processing.

Authors:  Jyoti Mishra; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Multisensory congruency as a mechanism for attentional control over perceptual selection.

Authors:  Raymond van Ee; Jeroen J A van Boxtel; Amanda L Parker; David Alais
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Attention cueing in rivalry: insights from pupillometry.

Authors:  Miriam Acquafredda; Paola Binda; Claudia Lunghi
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-06-03

5.  Fluctuations of visual awareness: combining motion-induced blindness with binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Katarzyna Jaworska; Martin Lages
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Willpower and conscious percept: volitional switching in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Laila Hugrass; David Crewther
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Perceptual rivalry: reflexes reveal the gradual nature of visual awareness.

Authors:  Marnix Naber; Stefan Frässle; Wolfgang Einhäuser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A hierarchical model of perceptual multistability involving interocular grouping.

Authors:  Yunjiao Wang; Zachary P Kilpatrick; Krešimir Josić
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 1.453

9.  General validity of Levelt's propositions reveals common computational mechanisms for visual rivalry.

Authors:  P Christiaan Klink; Raymond van Ee; Richard J A van Wezel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Perceptual switch rates with ambiguous structure-from-motion figures in bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Kristine Krug; Emma Brunskill; Antonina Scarna; Guy M Goodwin; Andrew J Parker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.