Literature DB >> 25239506

Computer-assisted navigation is beneficial both in primary and revision surgery with modular rotating-hinge knee arthroplasty.

Björn G Ochs1, Anna J Schreiner1, Peter M de Zwart1, Ulrich Stöckle1, Christoph Emanuel Gonser2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of the present study was to explore the effect of navigation on the reconstruction of the mechanical leg axis, implant positioning and the restoration of the joint line in hinged knee arthroplasty in vivo. We present the first 1- to 3-year clinical and radiological results following computer-navigated implantation of the EnduRo modular rotating-hinge knee arthroplasty system (Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany) as a primary or revision implant.
METHODS: Thirty-one patients were analysed retrospectively. Indication was revision surgery in 18 patients and complex primary surgery in 13. The clinical and radiological results of 31 patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months (mean 22.2 ± 6.2 months) were recorded. Age at follow-up was 55.2 ± 9.9 years.
RESULTS: The absolute varus-valgus deviation from the neutral mechanical leg axis was determined at 5.1° ± 5.1° preoperatively and 2.1° ± 1.4° postoperatively. No intraoperative complications or problems with the navigation system were observed. At latest follow-up, no component loosening was detected. Based on the Knee Society Score, a knee score of 64.9 ± 17.7 points and a function score of 67.2 ± 27.3 points were achieved.
CONCLUSIONS: Encouraging short-term clinical and radiological results with the computer-navigated implantation of the modular rotating-hinge EnduRo knee arthroplasty system were found in both primary and revision surgery. The navigation facilitated the reconstruction of the leg axis, implant positioning and the restoration of the joint line. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-assisted surgery; EnduRo; Knee replacement; Navigation; Revision knee arthroplasty; Rotating-hinge knee

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25239506     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3316-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  47 in total

1.  Revision total knee arthroplasty: fixation with modular stems.

Authors:  Wade T Gofton; Harry Tsigaras; R Allen Butler; James J Patterson; Robert L Barrack; Cecil H Rorabeck
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Cemented long-stem revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew L Whaley; Robert T Trousdale; James A Rand; Arlen D Hanssen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Medium-term results with a primary cemented rotating-hinge total knee replacement. A 7- to 15-year follow-up.

Authors:  G Petrou; H Petrou; C Tilkeridis; T Stavrakis; T Kapetsis; N Kremmidas; M Gavras
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-08

4.  Navigated revision knee arthroplasty using a system designed for primary surgery.

Authors:  Philippe Massin; Patrick Boyer; Jerome Pernin; Cecile Jeanrot
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2008-07

5.  Does the joint line matter in revision total knee replacement?

Authors:  A J Porteous; M A Hassaballa; J H Newman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-07

Review 6.  Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials?

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Song Zhao; Xiaochun Peng; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty is currently of no proven clinical benefit: a systematic review.

Authors:  R Stephen J Burnett; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Primary total knee arthroplasty using rotating-hinge prosthesis in severely affected knees.

Authors:  Jae-Hyuk Yang; Jung-Ro Yoon; Chi-Hun Oh; Taik-Sun Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  [Importance of computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty - results of a nationwide survey in Germany].

Authors:  B Rath; H-R Springorum; J Beckmann; J Schaumburger; M Tingart; J Grifka; C Lüring
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 0.923

10.  A vascular complication in computer navigated total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sandesh Gulhane; Ian Holloway; Mathew Bartlett
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.251

View more
  5 in total

1.  Accuracy assessment of wireless transponder tracking in the operating room environment.

Authors:  Roeland Eppenga; Koert Kuhlmann; Theo Ruers; Jasper Nijkamp
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Revision knee arthroplasty with rotating hinge systems in patients with gross ligament instability.

Authors:  Sebastian P Boelch; Joerg Arnholdt; Boris M Holzapfel; Axel Jakuscheit; Maximilian Rudert; Maik Hoberg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Hot spots and trends in knee revision research since the 21st century: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Kelei Zhai; Weifeng Ma; Tao Huang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-03

4.  Accuracy assessment of target tracking using two 5-degrees-of-freedom wireless transponders.

Authors:  Roeland Eppenga; Koert Kuhlmann; Theo Ruers; Jasper Nijkamp
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Rotating Hinge Prosthesis for Primary and Revision Knee Arthroplasty: Comparison and Indications.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Neuhaus; Kristin Maier
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 3.246

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.