Literature DB >> 33046540

Women Do Not Have Poorer Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Five-Year Follow-Up Study.

Winston Shang Rong Lim1, Ming Han Lincoln Liow1, Graham S. Goh1, William Yeo1, Zhixing Marcus Ling1, Wai-Mun Yue2, Chang Ming Guo1, Seang Beng Tan3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women undergoing lumbar spine surgery report greater preoperative pain and disability and have less improvement after surgery. There is a paucity of literature on sex-related differences after minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) surgery. We aim to determine whether sex influences outcome after MIS TLIF at 5-year midterm follow-up.
METHODS: Prospectively collected registry data for 907 patients who underwent MIS TLIF at a single institution from 2004 to 2013 were reviewed. Of these, 296 patients (94 males and 202 females) were reviewed at 5-year follow-up. All patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 and 5 years. Data recorded included patient demographics, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short-Form 36 Physical and Mental component scores (SF-36 PCS and MCS), and the North American Spine Society lumbar spine outcome assessment instrument.
RESULTS: Females who underwent MIS TLIF were generally younger (females, 52.2 years; males, 56.1 years; P = .04). Females had significantly poorer preoperative ODI (females, 49.5; males, 41.5; P < .001) and SF-36 PCS (females, 31.9; males, 35.6; P < .01) and MCS (females, 44.9; males, 49.2; P < .01) scores. At 2-year and 5-year follow-up, there were no significant differences in ODI, SF-36, and pain scores between sexes. Both groups reported similar proportions that returned to work and returned to function. There were no differences in proportion of patients who were satisfied or had their expectations fulfilled.
CONCLUSIONS: Women who undergo MIS TLIF have poorer preoperative function and quality of life than men. However, women demonstrated greater improvement after surgery, attaining similar clinical outcomes at 5-year follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3. This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery.
Copyright © 2020 ISASS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gender; minimally invasive surgery; patient reported outcome measure; spinal stenosis; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Year:  2020        PMID: 33046540      PMCID: PMC7671438          DOI: 10.14444/7108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  26 in total

1.  Does Gender Influence Postoperative Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?

Authors:  Benjamin Khechen; Brittany E Haws; Dil V Patel; Kaitlyn L Cardinal; Jordan A Guntin; Kern Singh
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.876

Review 2.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Prashanth J Rao; Andrew C Kam; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The significance of pain catastrophizing in clinical manifestations of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: mediation analysis with bootstrapping.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Chan-Hee Cho; Kyoung-Tak Kang; Bong-Soon Chang; Choon-Ki Lee; Jin S Yeom
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Kern Singh; Sreeharsha V Nandyala; Alejandro Marquez-Lara; Steven J Fineberg; Mathew Oglesby; Miguel A Pelton; Gunnar B Andersson; Darya Isayeva; Briana J Jegier; Frank M Phillips
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Patient-Specific Factors Associated With Dissatisfaction After Elective Surgery for Degenerative Spine Diseases.

Authors:  Silky Chotai; Ahilan Sivaganesan; Scott L Parker; Matthew J McGirt; Clinton J Devin
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.

Authors:  Anne G Copay; Steven D Glassman; Brian R Subach; Sigurd Berven; Thomas C Schuler; Leah Y Carreon
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Five-year outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a matched-pair comparison study.

Authors:  Chusheng Seng; Mashfiqul A Siddiqui; Kenneth P L Wong; Karen Zhang; William Yeo; Seang Beng Tan; Wai-Mun Yue
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Sex-based differences in pain perception and treatment.

Authors:  Channing J Paller; Claudia M Campbell; Robert R Edwards; Adrian S Dobs
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 9.  Effect of minimally invasive technique on return to work and narcotic use following transforaminal lumbar inter-body fusion: a review.

Authors:  Scott L Parker; Jason Lerner; Matthew J McGirt
Journal:  Prof Case Manag       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct

10.  An exploration of patients' expectation of and satisfaction with surgical outcome.

Authors:  Alison H McGregor; Caroline J Doré; Tim P Morris
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.