Literature DB >> 27286971

Gender differences in the surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation in elderly.

Fredrik Strömqvist1,2, Björn Strömqvist3, Bo Jönsson3, Magnus K Karlsson3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Outcome after lumbar disc herniation (LDH) surgery in middle-aged patient is usually reported to fulfill the criteria for successful outcome. It is also known that women in these years have an inferior outcome compared to men. This study evaluates whether the same gender differences exist in elderly.
METHOD: In the national Swedish register for spine surgery (SweSpine) we identified 1668 patients ≥65 years. 1250 of these patients had both pre- and 1-year postoperative data registered, 53 % males with mean age 70.6 ± 5.0 (mean ± SD) and 47 % females with mean age 71.3 ± 5.2. All were surgically treated due to LDH between 2000 and 2012.
RESULTS: Before surgery both men and women had severe impairment, compared to normative data, in all patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), with women having inferior status to men. Improvement by surgery was similar in both genders but neither of them reached normative values in quality of life as compared to normative age-matched individuals. As a consequence of this women 1 year after surgery had more back and leg pain, higher consumption of analgesics, greater impairment in walking distance and inferior scoring in virtually all registered PROMs compared to men (all p < 0.005). In spite of this women were as satisfied with the surgical outcome as the men.
CONCLUSION: Elderly women with LDH surgery report inferior outcome compared to males, mainly as a result of being referred to surgery with an inferior status but are despite this as satisfied with outcome as the men.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elderly; Gender; Lumbar disc herniation; Outcome; PROMS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27286971     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4638-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  30 in total

1.  Surgical results of lumbar disc herniation in the elderly.

Authors:  Y Gembun; Y Nakayama; Y Shirai; M Miyamoto; Y Kitagawa; T Yamada
Journal:  J Nippon Med Sch       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 0.920

Review 2.  The Oswestry Disability Index.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; P B Pynsent
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The Swedish National Register for lumbar spine surgery: Swedish Society for Spinal Surgery.

Authors:  B Strömqvist; B Jönsson; P Fritzell; O Hägg; B E Larsson; B Lind
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2001-04

4.  Surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation in elderly patients.

Authors:  K Fujii; T Henmi; Y Kanematsu; T Mishiro; T Sakai
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-11

5.  Responsiveness of general health status in chronic low back pain: a comparison of the COOP charts and the SF-36.

Authors:  G Bronfort; L M Bouter
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  The significance of pain catastrophizing in clinical manifestations of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: mediation analysis with bootstrapping.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Chan-Hee Cho; Kyoung-Tak Kang; Bong-Soon Chang; Choon-Ki Lee; Jin S Yeom
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Lumbar disc herniation in the elderly patient.

Authors:  M Di Silvestre; T Greggi; E Rulli; S Paderni; P Palumbi; P Parisini
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2001 Jul-Sep

8.  Comparison of radicular symptoms caused by lumbar disc herniation and lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly.

Authors:  James Rainville; Edrick Lopez
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Adolescent lumbar disc disease: findings and outcome.

Authors:  Raj Kumar; V Kumar; N K Das; S Behari; A K Mahapatra
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  Can we define success criteria for lumbar disc surgery? : estimates for a substantial amount of improvement in core outcome measures.

Authors:  Tore Solberg; Lars Gunnar Johnsen; Øystein P Nygaard; Margreth Grotle
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  6 in total

1.  The influence of gender on postoperative PROMIS physical function outcomes following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  James M Parrish; Nathaniel W Jenkins; Nadia M Hrynewycz; Thomas S Brundage; Kern Singh
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-04-10

2.  No Gender Differences in Pain Perception and Medication after Lumbar Spine Sequestrectomy-A Reanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Christa K Raak; Thomas Ostermann; Anna-Li Schönenberg-Tu; Oliver Fricke; David D Martin; Sibylle Robens; Wolfram Scharbrodt
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Gender Differences in the Self-assessment of Quality of Life and Disability After Spinal Fusion for Chronic Low Back Pain at a Neurosurgical Center in Eastern Europe.

Authors:  Gheorghe Ungureanu; Alexandra Chitu; Ioana Iancu; Cristian Kakucs; Tiberiu Maior; Ioan Stefan Florian
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2018-08-29

4.  Factors Associated With Longer Postoperative Outpatient Follow-up Duration in Patients With Single Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Noncomplicated Patient Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yunsuk Her; Suk-Hyung Kang; Yong-Jun Cho; Jin Seo Yang; Jin Pyeong Jeon; Hyuk Jai Choi
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2018-08-29

5.  Predictors of satisfaction after lumbar disc herniation surgery in elderly.

Authors:  Niyaz Hareni; Fredrik Strömqvist; Björn Strömqvist; Björn E Rosengren; Magnus K Karlsson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Anxiety and its predictive value for pain and regular analgesic intake after lumbar disc surgery - a prospective observational longitudinal study.

Authors:  Rita Laufenberg-Feldmann; Bernd Kappis; Rafael J A Cámara; Marion Ferner
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.630

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.