Literature DB >> 25236878

Distribution of vertebral fractures varies among patients according to hip fracture type.

J Watt1, L Cox, R G Crilly.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This study explored the distribution of vertebral fractures in hip fracture patients. Unlike patients with intertrochanteric fractures, those with subcapital fractures were less likely to have vertebral fractures in the T4-T10 region of the spine. The dissimilar distribution of vertebral fractures among patients with intertrochanteric and subcapital fractures may indicate different underlying etiologies.
INTRODUCTION: There are two main types of hip fractures: intertrochanteric and subcapital. Both types can have associated vertebral fractures. In this study, we explored the distribution of vertebral fractures in the two hip fracture populations.
METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of a convenience sample of 120 patients: 40 with subcapital fractures and vertebral fractures, 40 with intertrochanteric fractures and vertebral fractures, and 40 with vertebral fractures only. Based on Genant's semiquantitative assessment method of radiographic images, the distribution and severity of each patient's vertebral fractures were explored [1].
RESULTS: Patients with subcapital fractures had significantly fewer total vertebral fractures (93 vs. 144, p = 0.005; 93 vs. 127, p = 0.019), vertebral fractures from T4 to T10 (41 vs. 81, p = 0.005; 41 vs. 64, p = 0.042), and vertebral fractures at the T7-T8 peak (11 vs. 31, p = 0.002; 11 vs. 30, p = 0.003) than patients with intertrochanteric fractures and those with vertebral fractures alone, respectively, and they were more likely to have only one vertebral fracture (15 vs. 3, p < 0.001; 15 vs. 2, p < 0.001). The number of vertebral fractures from T11 to L4 and at the T12-L1 peak did not differ among the groups. The numbers of fractures at each vertebral level was significantly correlated only between those with intertrochanteric fractures and those with vertebral fractures alone (r = 0.65, p = 0.009).
CONCLUSION: The distribution of vertebral fractures among patients with subcapital fractures differed from the other fracture groups, which may indicate that subcapital fractures and some lumbar fractures have a different underlying etiology than intertrochanteric fractures and thoracic (T4-T10) fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25236878     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-014-2887-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  22 in total

1.  Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985-1989.

Authors:  C Cooper; E J Atkinson; W M O'Fallon; L J Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  The use of quantitative computed tomography to estimate risk of fracture of the hip from falls.

Authors:  J C Lotz; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Hip fracture types in men and women change differently with age.

Authors:  David A Tanner; Marita Kloseck; Richard G Crilly; Bert Chesworth; Jason Gilliland
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.921

4.  Femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures have different risk factors: a prospective study.

Authors:  K M Fox; S R Cummings; E Williams; K Stone
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Influence of the upper femur and pelvic geometry on the risk and type of hip fractures.

Authors:  J Partanen; T Jämsä; P Jalovaara
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  The assessment of vertebral fractures in elderly women with recent hip fractures: the BREAK Study.

Authors:  S Gonnelli; C Caffarelli; S Maggi; S Rossi; P Siviero; G Gandolini; C Cisari; M Rossini; G Iolascon; G Letizia Mauro; G Crepaldi; R Nuti
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Impact near the hip dominates fracture risk in elderly nursing home residents who fall.

Authors:  W C Hayes; E R Myers; J N Morris; T N Gerhart; H S Yett; L A Lipsitz
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur and spine with aging. Differences between the postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis syndromes.

Authors:  B L Riggs; H W Wahner; E Seeman; K P Offord; W L Dunn; R B Mazess; K A Johnson; L J Melton
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures.

Authors:  Ethel S Siris; Ya-Ting Chen; Thomas A Abbott; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Paul D Miller; Lois E Wehren; Marc L Berger
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-05-24

10.  Comparison of semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  H K Genant; M Jergas; L Palermo; M Nevitt; R S Valentin; D Black; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  6 in total

1.  New quantitative ultrasound techniques for bone analysis at the distal radius in hip fracture cases: differences between femoral neck and trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Motoyuki Horii; Hiroyoshi Fujiwara; Ryo Sakai; Koshiro Sawada; Yasuo Mikami; Syogo Toyama; Etsuko Ozaki; Nagato Kuriyama; Masao Kurokawa; Toshikazu Kubo
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2017-05-30

2.  Thoracolumbar spinal fractures associated with ground level falls in the elderly: An analysis of 254,486 emergency department visits.

Authors:  Zachary J Grabel; Matthew P Lunati; Dale N Segal; Nathan R Kukowski; S Tim Yoon; Amit Jain
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-04-10

3.  The Value of CT Three-Dimensional Reconstruction in Nursing and Diagnosis of Senile Hip Fracture.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Shi; Si Chen; Xue Chen; Pan Xue
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 2.682

4.  Hip Fracture Types in Canadian Men and Women Change Differently with Age: A Population-Level Analysis.

Authors:  Richard G Crilly; Marita Kloseck; Selam Mequanint
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-05-03

Review 5.  Osteoporotic mid-thoracic vertebral body fractures: what are the differences compared to fractures of the lumbar spine?-a systematic review.

Authors:  Ulrich Josef Spiegl; Max Joseph Scheyerer; Georg Osterhoff; Sebastian Grüninger; Klaus John Schnake
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  Recent trends in the incidence of hip fracture in Tottori Prefecture, Japan: changes over 32 years.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hagino; Mari Osaki; Reiko Okuda; Shinpei Enokida; Hideki Nagashima
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 2.617

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.