Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Individual differences in top-down restoration of interrupted speech: links to linguistic and cognitive abilities.

Literature DB >> 25234920

Individual differences in top-down restoration of interrupted speech: links to linguistic and cognitive abilities.

Michel Ruben Benard¹, Jorien Susanne Mensink¹, Deniz Başkent².

Abstract

Top-down restoration mechanisms can enhance perception of degraded speech. Even in normal hearing, however, a large variability has been observed in how effectively individuals can benefit from these mechanisms. To investigate if this variability is partially caused by individuals' linguistic and cognitive skills, normal-hearing participants of varying ages were assessed for receptive vocabulary (Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test; PPVT-III-NL), for full-scale intelligence (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale; WAIS-IV-NL), and for top-down restoration of interrupted speech (with silent or noise-filled gaps). Receptive vocabulary was significantly correlated with the other measures, suggesting linguistic skills to be highly involved in restoration of degraded speech.

Entities: Species

Mesh：

Year: 2014 PMID： 25234920 DOI： 10.1121/1.4862879

Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Acoust Soc Am ISSN： 0001-4966 Impact factor: 1.840

Keyword Cloud
Cited

19 in total

1. Integration of Partial Information Within and Across Modalities: Contributions to Spoken and Written Sentence Recognition.

Authors: Kimberly G Smith; Daniel Fogerty
Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 2.297

Review 2. The Enigma of Poor Performance by Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors: Aaron C Moberly; Chelsea Bates; Michael S Harris; David B Pisoni
Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 2.311

3. Effects of age and hearing loss on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.

Authors: Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Robert Risley; Brian Gygi
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 1.840

4. Glimpsing speech interrupted by speech-modulated noise.

Authors: Rachel E Miller; Bobby E Gibbs; Daniel Fogerty
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 1.840

5. Time-Compressed Speech Identification Is Predicted by Auditory Neural Processing, Perceptuomotor Speed, and Executive Functioning in Younger and Older Listeners.

Authors: James W Dias; Carolyn M McClaskey; Kelly C Harris
Journal: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol Date: 2018-11-19

6. Age effects on perceptual organization of speech: Contributions of glimpsing, phonemic restoration, and speech segregation.

Authors: William J Bologna; Kenneth I Vaden; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 1.840

Individual differences in top-down restoration of interrupted speech: links to linguistic and cognitive abilities.

1. Integration of Partial Information Within and Across Modalities: Contributions to Spoken and Written Sentence Recognition.

Review 2. The Enigma of Poor Performance by Adults With Cochlear Implants.

3. Effects of age and hearing loss on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.

4. Glimpsing speech interrupted by speech-modulated noise.

5. Time-Compressed Speech Identification Is Predicted by Auditory Neural Processing, Perceptuomotor Speed, and Executive Functioning in Younger and Older Listeners.

6. Age effects on perceptual organization of speech: Contributions of glimpsing, phonemic restoration, and speech segregation.

7. Age effects on perceptual restoration of degraded interrupted sentences.

8. The importance of a broad bandwidth for understanding "glimpsed" speech.

9. Impacts of signal processing factors on perceptual restoration in cochlear-implant users.

10. The musician effect: does it persist under degraded pitch conditions of cochlear implant simulations?