Literature DB >> 33588627

Incidence of Complete Insertion in Cochlear Implant Recipients of Long Lateral Wall Arrays.

Michael W Canfarotta1, Margaret T Dillon1, Kevin D Brown1, Harold C Pillsbury1, Matthew M Dedmon1, Brendan P O'Connell1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: High rates of partial insertion have been reported for cochlear implant (CI) recipients of long lateral wall electrode arrays, presumably caused by resistance encountered during insertion due to cochlear morphology. With recent advances in long-electrode array design, we sought to investigate (1) the incidence of complete insertions among patients implanted with 31.5-mm flexible arrays and (2) whether complete insertion is limited by cochlear duct length (CDL). STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center.
METHODS: Fifty-one adult CI recipients implanted with 31.5-mm flexible lateral wall arrays underwent postoperative computed tomography to determine the rate of complete insertion, defined as all contacts being intracochlear. CDL and angular insertion depth (AID) were compared between complete and partial insertion cohorts.
RESULTS: Most cases had a complete insertion (96.1%, n = 49). Among the complete insertion cohort, the median CDL was 33.6 mm (range, 30.3-37.9 mm), and median AID was 641° (range, 533-751°). Two cases of partial insertion had relatively short CDL (31.8 mm and 32.3 mm) and shallow AID (542° and 575°). Relatively shallow AID for the 2 cases of partial insertion fails to support the idea that CDL alone prevents a complete insertion.
CONCLUSION: Complete insertion of a 31.5-mm flexible array is feasible in most cases and does not appear to be limited by the range of CDL observed in this cohort. Future studies are needed to estimate other variations in cochlear morphology that could predict resistance and failure to achieve complete insertion with long arrays.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FlexSOFT; angular insertion depth; cochlear duct length; cochlear implant; cochlear morphology

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33588627      PMCID: PMC8943918          DOI: 10.1177/0194599820987456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   5.591


  59 in total

1.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Authors:  L M Friesen; R V Shannon; D Baskent; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Predictors of audiological outcome following cochlear implantation in adults.

Authors:  K M J Green; Y M Bhatt; D J Mawman; M P O'Driscoll; S R Saeed; R T Ramsden; M W Green
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2007-03

3.  Hearing preservation with full insertion of the FLEXsoft electrode.

Authors:  Paul Mick; Hosam Amoodi; David Shipp; Lendra Friesen; Sean Symons; Vincent Lin; Julian Nedzelski; Joseph Chen
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 4.  Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants.

Authors:  P Blamey; P Arndt; F Bergeron; G Bredberg; J Brimacombe; G Facer; J Larky; B Lindström; J Nedzelski; A Peterson; D Shipp; S Staller; L Whitford
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 5.  Consensus panel on a cochlear coordinate system applicable in histologic, physiologic, and radiologic studies of the human cochlea.

Authors:  Berit M Verbist; Margaret W Skinner; Lawrence T Cohen; Patricia A Leake; Chris James; Colette Boëx; Timothy A Holden; Charles C Finley; Peter S Roland; J Thomas Roland; Matt Haller; Jim F Patrick; Claude N Jolly; Mike A Faltys; Jeroen J Briaire; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  CT-derived estimation of cochlear morphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in Nucleus-22 recipients.

Authors:  Margaret W Skinner; Darlene R Ketten; Laura K Holden; Gary W Harding; Peter G Smith; George A Gates; J Gail Neely; G Robert Kletzker; Barry Brunsden; Barbara Blocker
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-02-27

7.  Depth of electrode insertion and postoperative performance in humans with cochlear implants: a histopathologic study.

Authors:  Joonhan Lee; Joseph B Nadol; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 8.  Measuring Cochlear Duct Length - a historical analysis of methods and results.

Authors:  Robert W Koch; Hanif M Ladak; Mai Elfarnawany; Sumit K Agrawal
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-03-07

9.  Long-Term Influence of Electrode Array Length on Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Michael W Canfarotta; Margaret T Dillon; Craig A Buchman; Emily Buss; Brendan P O'Connell; Meredith A Rooth; English R King; Harold C Pillsbury; Oliver F Adunka; Kevin D Brown
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Relationship Between Electrocochleography, Angular Insertion Depth, and Cochlear Implant Speech Perception Outcomes.

Authors:  Michael W Canfarotta; Brendan P O'Connell; Christopher K Giardina; Emily Buss; Kevin D Brown; Margaret T Dillon; Meredith A Rooth; Harold C Pillsbury; Craig A Buchman; Oliver F Adunka; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.