Literature DB >> 17050311

Effect of deep insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array on pitch estimation and speech perception.

Jafar Hamzavi1, Christoph Arnoldner.   

Abstract

CONCLUSION: Deeply inserted electrodes offer the possibility that apical stimulation may improve speech performances. Therefore, deep insertion is reasonable and should be performed in patients with profound or total hearing loss.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the importance of insertion depth beyond 25 mm in a group of cochlear implant patients with deeply inserted electrodes up to 32 mm. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the first part of the study patients were asked to perform a pitch estimation for channels across the whole length of the electrode array. We evaluated whether pitch discrimination was possible along the whole cochlea and especially in its apical part. Then, the audiological performances of 10 patients were tested in 5 conditions, in which we artificially varied the insertion depth in each patient by activating and deactivating channels. The patients were tested immediately in the new condition to avoid adaptation.
RESULTS: The results showed that activating the electrodes in the uppermost region of the cochlea improves speech perception significantly. Furthermore it could be demonstrated that the pitch perceived in the cochlea with electrical stimulation decreases with increasing insertion depth along the whole length of deeply inserted electrode arrays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17050311     DOI: 10.1080/00016480600672683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  14 in total

1.  Neural Processing of Acoustic and Electric Interaural Time Differences in Normal-Hearing Gerbils.

Authors:  Maike Vollmer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The Effect of Stimulus Polarity on the Relation Between Pitch Ranking and ECAP Spread of Excitation in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Emily R Spitzer; Sangsook Choi; Michelle L Hughes
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-01-31

3.  [Cochlear implants in children and adolescents].

Authors:  R Mlynski; S Plontke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Perceptual changes in place of stimulation with long cochlear implant electrode arrays.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Griet Mertens; Andrea Kleine Punte; Paul Van De Heyning
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The Relationship Between Insertion Angles, Default Frequency Allocations, and Spiral Ganglion Place Pitch in Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Maja Svrakic; J Thomas Roland; Mario Svirsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Minimum Reporting Standards for Adult Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Oliver F Adunka; Bruce J Gantz; Camille Dunn; Richard K Gurgel; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Qualities of Single Electrode Stimulation as a Function of Rate and Place of Stimulation with a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Katrien Vermeire; Annes Claes; Vincent Van Rompaey; Paul Van de Heyning
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Investigation of the effect of cochlear implant electrode length on speech comprehension in quiet and noise compared with the results with users of electro-acoustic-stimulation, a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Büchner; Angelika Illg; Omid Majdani; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Site of cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials using the MED-EL standard electrode array.

Authors:  Stefan Brill; Joachim Müller; Rudolf Hagen; Alexander Möltner; Steffi-Johanna Brockmeier; Thomas Stark; Silke Helbig; Jan Maurer; Thomas Zahnert; Clemens Zierhofer; Peter Nopp; Ilona Anderson; Stefan Strahl
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  Encoding a Melody Using Only Temporal Information for Cochlear-Implant and Normal-Hearing Listeners.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Griet Mertens; Paul Van de Heyning; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.