RATIONALE: The regenerative potential of the heart is insufficient to fully restore functioning myocardium after injury, motivating the quest for a cell-based replacement strategy. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have the capacity for cardiac repair that appears to exceed their capacity for differentiation into cardiac myocytes. OBJECTIVE: Here, we test the hypothesis that bone marrow derived MSCs stimulate the proliferation and differentiation of endogenous cardiac stem cells (CSCs) as part of their regenerative repertoire. METHODS AND RESULTS: Female Yorkshire pigs (n=31) underwent experimental myocardial infarction (MI), and 3 days later, received transendocardial injections of allogeneic male bone marrow-derived MSCs, MSC concentrated conditioned medium (CCM), or placebo (Plasmalyte). A no-injection control group was also studied. MSCs engrafted and differentiated into cardiomyocytes and vascular structures. In addition, endogenous c-kit(+) CSCs increased 20-fold in MSC-treated animals versus controls (P<0.001), there was a 6-fold increase in GATA-4(+) CSCs in MSC versus control (P<0.001), and mitotic myocytes increased 4-fold (P=0.005). Porcine endomyocardial biopsies were harvested and plated as organotypic cultures in the presence or absence of MSC feeder layers. In vitro, MSCs stimulated c-kit(+) CSCs proliferation into enriched populations of adult cardioblasts that expressed Nkx2-5 and troponin I. CONCLUSIONS: MSCs stimulate host CSCs, a new mechanism of action underlying successful cell-based therapeutics.
RATIONALE: The regenerative potential of the heart is insufficient to fully restore functioning myocardium after injury, motivating the quest for a cell-based replacement strategy. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have the capacity for cardiac repair that appears to exceed their capacity for differentiation into cardiac myocytes. OBJECTIVE: Here, we test the hypothesis that bone marrow derived MSCs stimulate the proliferation and differentiation of endogenous cardiac stem cells (CSCs) as part of their regenerative repertoire. METHODS AND RESULTS: Female Yorkshire pigs (n=31) underwent experimental myocardial infarction (MI), and 3 days later, received transendocardial injections of allogeneic male bone marrow-derived MSCs, MSC concentrated conditioned medium (CCM), or placebo (Plasmalyte). A no-injection control group was also studied. MSCs engrafted and differentiated into cardiomyocytes and vascular structures. In addition, endogenous c-kit(+) CSCs increased 20-fold in MSC-treated animals versus controls (P<0.001), there was a 6-fold increase in GATA-4(+) CSCs in MSC versus control (P<0.001), and mitotic myocytes increased 4-fold (P=0.005). Porcine endomyocardial biopsies were harvested and plated as organotypic cultures in the presence or absence of MSC feeder layers. In vitro, MSCs stimulated c-kit(+) CSCs proliferation into enriched populations of adult cardioblasts that expressed Nkx2-5 and troponin I. CONCLUSIONS: MSCs stimulate host CSCs, a new mechanism of action underlying successful cell-based therapeutics.
Authors: Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz; Alessandra Moretti; Jason Lam; Peter Gruber; Yinhong Chen; Sarah Woodard; Li-Zhu Lin; Chen-Leng Cai; Min Min Lu; Michael Reth; Oleksandr Platoshyn; Jason X-J Yuan; Sylvia Evans; Kenneth R Chien Journal: Nature Date: 2005-02-10 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Massimiliano Gnecchi; Huamei He; Olin D Liang; Luis G Melo; Fulvio Morello; Hui Mu; Nicolas Noiseux; Lunan Zhang; Richard E Pratt; Joanne S Ingwall; Victor J Dzau Journal: Nat Med Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Luciano C Amado; Anastasios P Saliaris; Karl H Schuleri; Marcus St John; Jin-Sheng Xie; Stephen Cattaneo; Daniel J Durand; Torin Fitton; Jin Qiang Kuang; Garrick Stewart; Stephanie Lehrke; William W Baumgartner; Bradley J Martin; Alan W Heldman; Joshua M Hare Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-08-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: A Steele; O Y Jones; F Gok; Y Marikar; P Steele; W Chamizo; M Scott; R J Boucek Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: A P Beltrami; K Urbanek; J Kajstura; S M Yan; N Finato; R Bussani; B Nadal-Ginard; F Silvestri; A Leri; C A Beltrami; P Anversa Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-06-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M F Pittenger; A M Mackay; S C Beck; R K Jaiswal; R Douglas; J D Mosca; M A Moorman; D W Simonetti; S Craig; D R Marshak Journal: Science Date: 1999-04-02 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: S N Robinson; J Ng; T Niu; H Yang; J D McMannis; S Karandish; I Kaur; P Fu; M Del Angel; R Messinger; F Flagge; M de Lima; W Decker; D Xing; R Champlin; E J Shpall Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Einar Heiberg; Henrik Engblom; Jan Engvall; Erik Hedström; Martin Ugander; Håkan Arheden Journal: Scand Cardiovasc J Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 1.589
Authors: Guilherme V Silva; Silvio Litovsky; Joao A R Assad; Andre L S Sousa; Bradley J Martin; Deborah Vela; Stephanie C Coulter; Jing Lin; Judy Ober; William K Vaughn; Rodrigo V C Branco; Edie M Oliveira; Rumin He; Yong-Jian Geng; James T Willerson; Emerson C Perin Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-01-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: James D Richardson; Adam J Nelson; Andrew C W Zannettino; Stan Gronthos; Stephen G Worthley; Peter J Psaltis Journal: Stem Cell Rev Rep Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 5.739
Authors: Gregory W Serrao; Irene C Turnbull; Damian Ancukiewicz; Do Eun Kim; Evan Kao; Timothy J Cashman; Lahouaria Hadri; Roger J Hajjar; Kevin D Costa Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2012-06-25 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Ewa K Zuba-Surma; Wojciech Wojakowski; Mariusz Z Ratajczak; Buddhadeb Dawn Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2011-05-05 Impact factor: 8.401