Prasongchai Sattayaprasert1, Drew M Nassal2, Xiaoping Wan2, Isabelle Deschenes2, Kenneth R Laurita3. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, MetroHealth Campus of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States; Heart & Vascular Research Center, MetroHealth Campus of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States. 2. Heart & Vascular Research Center, MetroHealth Campus of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States. 3. Heart & Vascular Research Center, MetroHealth Campus of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States. Electronic address: Kenneth.Laurita@case.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The paracrine action of non-cardiac progenitor cells is robust, but not well understood. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) have been shown to enhance calcium (Ca(++)) cycling in myocytes. Therefore, we hypothesized that MSCs can suppress cardiac alternans, an important arrhythmia substrate, by paracrine action on Ca(++) cycling. METHODS AND RESULTS: Human cardiac myocyte monolayers derived from iPS cells (hCM) were cultured without or with human MSCs (hMSC) directly or plated on a transwell insert. Ca(++) transient alternans (Ca(++) ALT) and Ca(++) transient duration (CaD) were measured from hCM monolayers following application of 200μM H2O2. Ca(++) ALT in hCM was significantly decreased when cultured with hMSCs directly (97%, p<0.0001) and when cultured with hMSC in the transwell insert (80%, p<0.0001). When hCM with hMSCs were pretreated with PI3K or eNOS inhibitors, Ca(++) ALT was larger than baseline by 20% (p<0.0001) and 36% (p<0.0001), respectively. In contrast, Ca(++) ALT was reduced by 89% compared to baseline (p<0.0001) when hCM monolayers without hMSCs were pretreated with 20μM GSNO. In all experiments, changes in Ca(++) ALT were mirrored by changes in CaD. Finally, real time quantitative PCR revealed no significant differences in mRNA expression of RyR2, SERCA2a, and phospholamban between hCM cultured with or without hMSCs. CONCLUSION: Ca(++) ALT is suppressed by hMSCs in a paracrine fashion due to activation of a PI3K-mediated nitroso-redox pathway. These findings demonstrate, for the first time, how stem cell therapy might be antiarrhythmic by suppressing cardiac alternans through paracrine action on Ca(++) cycling.
BACKGROUND: The paracrine action of non-cardiac progenitor cells is robust, but not well understood. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) have been shown to enhance calcium (Ca(++)) cycling in myocytes. Therefore, we hypothesized that MSCs can suppress cardiac alternans, an important arrhythmia substrate, by paracrine action on Ca(++) cycling. METHODS AND RESULTS:Human cardiac myocyte monolayers derived from iPS cells (hCM) were cultured without or with human MSCs (hMSC) directly or plated on a transwell insert. Ca(++) transient alternans (Ca(++) ALT) and Ca(++) transient duration (CaD) were measured from hCM monolayers following application of 200μM H2O2. Ca(++) ALT in hCM was significantly decreased when cultured with hMSCs directly (97%, p<0.0001) and when cultured with hMSC in the transwell insert (80%, p<0.0001). When hCM with hMSCs were pretreated with PI3K or eNOS inhibitors, Ca(++) ALT was larger than baseline by 20% (p<0.0001) and 36% (p<0.0001), respectively. In contrast, Ca(++) ALT was reduced by 89% compared to baseline (p<0.0001) when hCM monolayers without hMSCs were pretreated with 20μM GSNO. In all experiments, changes in Ca(++) ALT were mirrored by changes in CaD. Finally, real time quantitative PCR revealed no significant differences in mRNA expression of RyR2, SERCA2a, and phospholamban between hCM cultured with or without hMSCs. CONCLUSION: Ca(++) ALT is suppressed by hMSCs in a paracrine fashion due to activation of a PI3K-mediated nitroso-redox pathway. These findings demonstrate, for the first time, how stem cell therapy might be antiarrhythmic by suppressing cardiac alternans through paracrine action on Ca(++) cycling.
Authors: Aman Mahajan; Daisuke Sato; Yohannes Shiferaw; Ali Baher; Lai-Hua Xie; Robert Peralta; Riccardo Olcese; Alan Garfinkel; Zhilin Qu; James N Weiss Journal: Biophys J Date: 2008-01-15 Impact factor: 4.033
Authors: Saïd F A Askar; Arti A Ramkisoensing; Douwe E Atsma; Martin J Schalij; Antoine A F de Vries; Daniël A Pijnappels Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2013-02-18
Authors: Nikhil C Panda; Sean T Zuckerman; Olurotimi O Mesubi; David S Rosenbaum; Marc S Penn; J Kevin Donahue; Eben Alsberg; Kenneth R Laurita Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2014-09-19 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Muhammad R Afzal; Anweshan Samanta; Zubair I Shah; Vinodh Jeevanantham; Ahmed Abdel-Latif; Ewa K Zuba-Surma; Buddhadeb Dawn Journal: Circ Res Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Alan W Heldman; Darcy L DiFede; Joel E Fishman; Juan P Zambrano; Barry H Trachtenberg; Vasileios Karantalis; Muzammil Mushtaq; Adam R Williams; Viky Y Suncion; Ian K McNiece; Eduard Ghersin; Victor Soto; Gustavo Lopera; Roberto Miki; Howard Willens; Robert Hendel; Raul Mitrani; Pradip Pattany; Gary Feigenbaum; Behzad Oskouei; John Byrnes; Maureen H Lowery; Julio Sierra; Mariesty V Pujol; Cindy Delgado; Phillip J Gonzalez; Jose E Rodriguez; Luiza Lima Bagno; Didier Rouy; Peter Altman; Cheryl Wong Po Foo; Jose da Silva; Erica Anderson; Richard Schwarz; Adam Mendizabal; Joshua M Hare Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-01-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Farideh Beigi; Jeffrey Schmeckpeper; Pete Pow-Anpongkul; James Alan Payne; Lunan Zhang; Zhiping Zhang; Jing Huang; Maria Mirotsou; Victor J Dzau Journal: Circ Res Date: 2013-06-19 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Joshua Mayourian; Delaine K Ceholski; David M Gonzalez; Timothy J Cashman; Susmita Sahoo; Roger J Hajjar; Kevin D Costa Journal: Circ Res Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Matthew T McPheeters; Yves T Wang; Andreas A Werdich; Michael W Jenkins; Kenneth R Laurita Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-08-24 Impact factor: 3.240