Literature DB >> 25233946

Length of clinically proven cemented hip stems: state of the art or subject to improvement?

Moussa Hamadouche1, Alexander Jahnke, Caroline Scemama, Bernd Alexander Ishaque, Markus Rickert, Luc Kerboull, Eike Jakubowitz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify the shortest possible length of an established cemented hip stem in order to reduce stress shielding and optimise its bending behaviour.
METHODS: Twenty-five prototypes from the same batch (five for each stem length) were included. Lengths resulted from the original length (100 %) and four distal shortenings to 94, 88, 83 and 78 % of original length. For standardised implantations, synthetic femurs were prepared. Relative movements under axial torque and stem bending under varus-valgus torque applications were investigated consecutively. Analyses of variance (ANOVA) were applied to detect differences between lengths.
RESULTS: The maximum torque transfer occurred at the level of the lesser trochanter (p < 0.01). In particular, for the 78 % version, relative motion of the stem tip increased significantly compared with all other lengths (p = 0.02-0.04). Comparable findings were made for mean overall movements. In regards to varus-valgus torque, both the distal tip and the proximal shoulder always bent in the same direction following the femoral deflection. For the 83 % version bending of stem's shoulder was increased compared with the other length (p = 0.01 - 0.02), whereas tip bending was always comparable (p = 0.45-0.91).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that the intention to preclinically optimise the mechanical behaviour of cemented stems by modifying their length seems to be a reasonable option. Advantages are decreased inner bone stiffening to reduce stress shielding and a lower cement volume, which is involved in cellular interactions.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25233946     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2522-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  20 in total

1.  Should total hip arthroplasty femoral components be designed to subside? A radiostereometric analysis study of the Charnley Elite and Exeter stems.

Authors:  J Alfaro-Adrián; H S Gill; D W Murray
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  The effect of multifilaments and monofilaments on cementless femoral revision hip components: an experimental study.

Authors:  Eike Jakubowitz; Stefan Kinkel; Jan Nadorf; Christian Heisel; J Philippe Kretzer; Marc N Thomsen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Excellent results from proximally HA-coated femoral stems with a minimum of 6 years follow-up: a prospective evaluation of 100 patients.

Authors:  Jon H M Goosen; Anne J Swieringa; J George M Keet; Cees C P M Verheyen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 4.  The design features of cemented femoral hip implants.

Authors:  T Scheerlinck; P-P Casteleyn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-11

5.  Primary rotational stability of cylindrical and conical revision hip stems as a function of femoral bone defects: an in vitro comparison.

Authors:  Eike Jakubowitz; Rudi G Bitsch; Christian Heisel; Christoph Lee; Jan P Kretzer; Marc N Thomsen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Stress transfer at the femoral bone/bone cement interface as a function of the cement thickness.

Authors:  V Jansson; B Heimkes; M Zimmer
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Fracture load for periprosthetic femoral fractures in cemented versus uncemented hip stems: an experimental in vitro study.

Authors:  Marc N Thomsen; Eike Jakubowitz; Joern B Seeger; Christoph Lee; Jan P Kretzer; Michael Clarius
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.390

8.  Long-term (20- to 25-year) results of an uncemented tapered titanium femoral component and factors affecting survivorship.

Authors:  Marcus R Streit; Moritz M Innmann; Christian Merle; Thomas Bruckner; Peter R Aldinger; Tobias Gotterbarm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Primary stability of the Fitmore stem: biomechanical comparison.

Authors:  Wojciech Pepke; Jan Nadorf; Volker Ewerbeck; Marcus R Streit; Stefan Kinkel; Tobias Gotterbarm; Michael W Maier; J Philippe Kretzer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  An infrared study of the interaction of polymethyl methacrylate with the protein and mineral components of bone.

Authors:  N L Pleshko; A L Boskey; R Mendelsohn
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.479

View more
  3 in total

1.  Results of total hip arthroplasty using a bionic hip stem.

Authors:  Samo K Fokter; Taras Sarler; Andrej Strahovnik; Alenka Repše-Fokter
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Optimization of a Functionally Graded Material Stem in the Femoral Component of a Cemented Hip Arthroplasty: Influence of Dimensionality of FGM.

Authors:  Abdellah Ait Moussa; Rohan Yadav
Journal:  J Med Eng       Date:  2017-06-21

3.  Minimizing Stress Shielding and Cement Damage in Cemented Femoral Component of a Hip Prosthesis through Computational Design Optimization.

Authors:  Abdellah Ait Moussa; Justin Fischer; Rohan Yadav; Morshed Khandaker
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2017-02-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.