Literature DB >> 25232432

Safety and effectiveness of three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Burhan Mayir1, Ugur Dogan1, Umit Koc1, Arif Aslaner1, Tuna Bılecık1, Cemal Ozben Ensarı1, Tugrul Cakir1, Mehmet Tahir Oruc1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Most commonly performed laparoscopic surgery is laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Although cholecystectomy through three port is not commonly preferred, researches have shown that it is a safe and feasible way of surgery. Material and Methods. We evaluate 100 patient that have undergone elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy through three port (group one). These patients were compared with 50 patients that have undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy through four port (group two). Complications, lenght of stay in hospital, operation time, conversion to open surgery rate were compared in two group.
RESULTS: In group one, fourth port was necessary for nine (9%) patients. Duration of operation in group one was in average 31 min and in group two, 31, 3 min. Operation time, lenght of stay in hospital, complication rate, conversion to open surgery rate was similar in both groups.
CONCLUSION: Three port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safer method when performed by experienced surgeons. Laparoscopic cholecyctectomy can be tried through three ports firstly and can be continued with addition of fourth port if necessary.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic cholecyctectomy; cholelithiasis; minimal invazive surgery; three port cholecyctectomy

Year:  2014        PMID: 25232432      PMCID: PMC4161592     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  13 in total

1.  Twenty-millimeter laparoscopic cholecystectomy: fewer ports results in less pain, shorter hospitalization, and faster recovery.

Authors:  Dana Osborne; Brian Boe; Alexander S Rosemurgy; Emmanuel E Zervos
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 0.688

2.  Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S Trichak
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Experience with three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  N Tagaya; J Kita; K Takagi; T Imada; K Ishikawa; H Kogure; O Ohyama
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  1998

4.  Three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Shaoliang Sun; Kehu Yang; Mingtai Gao; Xiaodong He; Jinhui Tian; Bin Ma
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an original three-trocar technique.

Authors:  K Slim; D Pezet; J Stencl; C Lechner; S Le Roux; P Lointier; J Chipponi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S R Markar; A Karthikesalingam; S Thrumurthy; L Muirhead; J Kinross; P Paraskeva
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Two-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  C M Poon; K W Chan; D W H Lee; K C Chan; C W Ko; H Y Cheung; K W Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  The standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R Bittner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Three-port versus standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial in a community-based teaching hospital in eastern Nepal.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar; Chandra Shekhar Agrawal; Rakesh Kumar Gupta
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2007 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute and chronic cholecystitis.

Authors:  Dhafir Al-Azawi; Nariman Houssein; Abu Bakir Rayis; Donal McMahon; Dermot J Hehir
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A comparison of surgical procedures and postoperative cares for minimally invasive laparoscopic gastrectomy and open gastrectomy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hong-Na Tang; Jun-Hong Hu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

2.  Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of three-port vs four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (level 1 evidence).

Authors:  Shahab Hajibandeh; David A Finch; Ali Yasen Y Mohamedahmed; Amir Iskandar; Gowtham Venkatesan; Shahin Hajibandeh; Thomas Satyadas
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-02-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.