Literature DB >> 15943402

Twenty-millimeter laparoscopic cholecystectomy: fewer ports results in less pain, shorter hospitalization, and faster recovery.

Dana Osborne1, Brian Boe, Alexander S Rosemurgy, Emmanuel E Zervos.   

Abstract

Improvements in technology offer the ability to refine operations without compromising safety. In this study, we determine whether a modified method of laparoscopic cholecystectomy using three ports and an aggregate incision length of 20 mm offers any advantage or poses increased risk. Using a 5-mm, 30 degree laparoscope, clip applier, and dissector, the gall bladder is removed through an extended umbilical incision. Standard safety principles were followed: achieving the "critical view," lateral retraction of the fundus, double ligation of the proximal structures, and maintaining sterility for specimen removal. Forty-one consecutive standard laparoscopic cholecystectomies were used as a control group to compare complications, length of stay and surgery, pain scores, and return to work. Sixty patients have undergone the modified technique. There were no differences between the modified and standard technique with regard to cost or complications. Length of surgery was significantly shorter, as was length of stay, narcotics use, and return to work for the modified group versus the control. A modified technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy poses no increased risk to patients but offers potential for shorter surgery and hospital stays, less need for narcotic analgesia, and faster recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15943402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  12 in total

1.  Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Conventional Laparoscopic Instruments and Comparison with Three-Port Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Megha Singh; Kuldeep Singh Mehta; Mir Yasir; Ameet Kaur; Aiffa Aiman; Akangsha Sharma; Neeraj Kaur
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Steven E Hodgett; Jonathan M Hernandez; Connor A Morton; Sharona B Ross; Michael Albrink; Alexander S Rosemurgy
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Single port access laparoscopic cholecystectomy (with video).

Authors:  Pascal Bucher; François Pugin; Nicolas Buchs; Sandrine Ostermann; Fadi Charara; Philippe Morel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Shaoliang Sun; Kehu Yang; Mingtai Gao; Xiaodong He; Jinhui Tian; Bin Ma
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) vs. conventional laparoscopic fundoplication for GERD: is there a difference?

Authors:  Sharona Ross; Andy Roddenbery; Kenneth Luberice; Harold Paul; Thomas Farrior; Michelle Vice; Krishen Patel; Alexander Rosemurgy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  EUS-guided versus endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage in high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rajesh Krishnamoorthi; Mahendran Jayaraj; Viveksandeep Thoguluva Chandrasekar; Dhruv Singh; Joanna Law; Michael Larsen; Andrew Ross; Richard Kozarek; Shayan Irani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Safety and effectiveness of three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Burhan Mayir; Ugur Dogan; Umit Koc; Arif Aslaner; Tuna Bılecık; Cemal Ozben Ensarı; Tugrul Cakir; Mehmet Tahir Oruc
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-08-15

8.  Is fourth port really required in laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Authors:  Mushtaq Chalkoo; Shahnawaz Ahangar; Abdul Munnon Durrani
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 0.656

9.  Three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute and chronic cholecystitis.

Authors:  Dhafir Al-Azawi; Nariman Houssein; Abu Bakir Rayis; Donal McMahon; Dermot J Hehir
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  A comparative study of two-port versus three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Ranendra Hajong; Peter Ds Khariong
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.407

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.