Literature DB >> 9880780

Experience with three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

N Tagaya1, J Kita, K Takagi, T Imada, K Ishikawa, H Kogure, O Ohyama.   

Abstract

After considerable experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) using four ports, we began using three-port LC in October 1993 and have performed 130 LCs with this procedure up to May 1996. The procedure was successful in 119 patients. In 6 patients fourth port was used, and in another 5, the procedure was converted to open laparo-tomy. Cooperative manipulation of the surgical instruments between the operator and assistant is very important for this procedure, for exposing Calot's triangle and dissecting the gallbladder from the gallbladder bed. The use of an ultrasonic aspiration system (Sumisonic ME 2400; Sumitomo Bakelite, Tokyo, Japan) made it easier to identify the cystic duct and artery, especially in patients with chronic inflammation or dense adhesions. We encountered no problems with cannulation into the cystic duct for intraoperative cholangiography, and there were no intra- and postoperative complications in this series. We achieved good results, similar to those achieved with the four-port technique. This technique is technically feasible and safe, and it has esthetic and cost advantages compared with the four-port technique. However, the operator who performs three-port LC should not hesitate to add another port, or to convert to open laparotomy, whenever any difficulties occur during this procedure, to prevent critical complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9880780     DOI: 10.1007/s005340050051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg        ISSN: 0944-1166


  9 in total

1.  Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Conventional Laparoscopic Instruments and Comparison with Three-Port Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Megha Singh; Kuldeep Singh Mehta; Mir Yasir; Ameet Kaur; Aiffa Aiman; Akangsha Sharma; Neeraj Kaur
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Reusable single-port access device shortens operative time and reduces operative costs.

Authors:  Noam Shussman; Asaf Kedar; Ram Elazary; Mahmoud Abu Gazala; Avraham I Rivkind; Yoav Mintz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Safety and effectiveness of three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Burhan Mayir; Ugur Dogan; Umit Koc; Arif Aslaner; Tuna Bılecık; Cemal Ozben Ensarı; Tugrul Cakir; Mehmet Tahir Oruc
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-08-15

4.  Three-port microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy in 159 patients.

Authors:  P L Leggett; C D Bissell; R Churchman-Winn; C Ahn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Retraction and triangulation with neodymium magnetic forceps for single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Guillermo Dominguez; Luis Durand; Julián De Rosa; Eduardo Danguise; Carlos Arozamena; Pedro A Ferraina
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: lessons learned for success.

Authors:  Noam Shussman; Avraham Schlager; Ram Elazary; Abed Khalaileh; Andrei Keidar; Mark Talamini; Santiago Horgan; Avraham I Rivkind; Yoav Mintz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Feasibility and Safety of Three-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Compared to Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Mohd Yunus Shah; Umeshraj Somasundaram; TRVRaju Wilkinson; Nitin Wasnik
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-29

8.  Three-port versus four-port technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lawrence Nip; Kin-Seng Tong; Cynthia M Borg
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-03-08

9.  Three-port versus standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial in a community-based teaching hospital in eastern Nepal.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar; Chandra Shekhar Agrawal; Rakesh Kumar Gupta
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2007 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.