Xiaojun Li1, Hongnan Jiang1, Jinliang Niu1, Ying Zheng1. 1. 1 Department of Radiology, 2 Department of Breast Surgery, the 2nd Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) is a well-studied MR imaging technique for quantifying water diffusion especially in tumor area. The correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and apoptosis or proliferation is not clear by now. This study aimed to investigate whether DWI-ADC value could be used as an imaging marker related with pathologic indexes of tumors. METHODS: A total of 30 Balb/c mice with HT29 colorectal carcinoma were subjected to DWI and histologic analysis. The percentage of ADC changes and the apoptotic and proliferating indexes were calculated at predefined time points. Kolmogorov-Smirnov distances were considered to determine whether the percentage of ADC changes, and the apoptotic and proliferating indexes were normally distributed. An independent-samples t-test was used to analyze the difference between apoptotic and proliferating indexes in the two groups. RESULTS: THERE WAS A STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN PROLIFERATING INDEX BETWEEN THE RADIOTHERAPY AND CONTROL GROUPS (MEAN PROLIFERATING INDEX: 49.27% vs. 83.09%), and there was a statistically significant difference in apoptotic index between the two groups (mean apoptotic index: 37.7% vs. 2.71%). A significant positive correlation was found between the percentage of ADC changes of the viable tissue and apoptotic index. Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.655 (P=0.015). A significant negative correlation was found between the percentage of ADC changes of the viable tissue and ki-67 proliferation index. Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.734 (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that ADC value may be used in measurement of cell apoptotic and proliferating indexes in colorectal carcinoma.
OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) is a well-studied MR imaging technique for quantifying water diffusion especially in tumor area. The correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and apoptosis or proliferation is not clear by now. This study aimed to investigate whether DWI-ADC value could be used as an imaging marker related with pathologic indexes of tumors. METHODS: A total of 30 Balb/c mice with HT29 colorectal carcinoma were subjected to DWI and histologic analysis. The percentage of ADC changes and the apoptotic and proliferating indexes were calculated at predefined time points. Kolmogorov-Smirnov distances were considered to determine whether the percentage of ADC changes, and the apoptotic and proliferating indexes were normally distributed. An independent-samples t-test was used to analyze the difference between apoptotic and proliferating indexes in the two groups. RESULTS: THERE WAS A STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN PROLIFERATING INDEX BETWEEN THE RADIOTHERAPY AND CONTROL GROUPS (MEAN PROLIFERATING INDEX: 49.27% vs. 83.09%), and there was a statistically significant difference in apoptotic index between the two groups (mean apoptotic index: 37.7% vs. 2.71%). A significant positive correlation was found between the percentage of ADC changes of the viable tissue and apoptotic index. Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.655 (P=0.015). A significant negative correlation was found between the percentage of ADC changes of the viable tissue and ki-67 proliferation index. Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.734 (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that ADC value may be used in measurement of cell apoptotic and proliferating indexes in colorectal carcinoma.
Authors: T Sugahara; Y Korogi; M Kochi; I Ikushima; Y Shigematu; T Hirai; T Okuda; L Liang; Y Ge; Y Komohara; Y Ushio; M Takahashi Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: R K Gupta; T F Cloughesy; U Sinha; J Garakian; J Lazareff; G Rubino; L Rubino; D P Becker; H V Vinters; J R Alger Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: J M Hakumäki; H Poptani; A M Puumalainen; S Loimas; L A Paljärvi; S Ylä-Herttuala; R A Kauppinen Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1998-09-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Karen C Johnston; Douglas P Wagner; Xin-Qun Wang; George C Newman; Vincent Thijs; Souvik Sen; Steven Warach Journal: Stroke Date: 2007-04-19 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Monique R Bernsen; Klazina Kooiman; Marcel Segbers; Fijs W B van Leeuwen; Marion de Jong Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 9.236