Literature DB >> 12591638

Combination of single-voxel proton MR spectroscopy and apparent diffusion coefficient calculation in the evaluation of common brain tumors.

Nail Bulakbasi1, Murat Kocaoglu, Fatih Ors, Cem Tayfun, Taner Uçöz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: MR spectroscopy and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) calculation have been used frequently for tumor grading and differentiation during the last decade. We evaluated whether the combination of these two techniques can improve the diagnostic effectiveness of MR imaging in patients with brain tumors.
METHODS: Forty-nine patients with histologically proved brain tumors (eight high- and 12 low-grade astrocytomas, eight metastases, eight nonastrocytic gliomas, seven meningiomas, three dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors (DNETs), and three tuberculomas) were prospectively evaluated with contrast material-enhanced MR imaging, single-voxel proton MR spectroscopy (TE = 135 ms), and diffusion-weighted imaging (b = 0, 500, and 1000 s/mm(2)) before surgery.
RESULTS: MR spectroscopy could differentiate benign from malignant tumors but was not useful in grading malignant tumors. In the differentiation of malignant from benign tumors, N-acetylaspartate (NAA)/choline (Cho), NAA/Cho + creatine (Cr), lactate/Cr, and alanin/Cr ratios (P <.001) were statistically more significant than NAA/Cr and lactate/lipid ratios (P <.05). Increase in lipid/Cr and alanin/Cr ratios could distinguish metastasis and meningiomas from other tumors, respectively (P <.001). DNETs could be diagnosed by their normal spectra and high ADC values (116.25 +/- 6.93 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s). Increase in lactate/Cr ratio correlated with degree of malignancy (r = -0.71). ADCs were effective for grading malignant tumors (P <.001) but not for distinguishing different tumor types with the same grade. High-grade malignant tumors (87.16 +/- 10.41 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) had significantly lower ADC values than did low-grade malignant (115.33 +/- 11.67 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) and benign (107.69 +/- 8.05 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) tumors. Peritumoral ADCs were significantly higher in low-grade than in high-grade astrocytomas (P <.05).
CONCLUSION: Combination of calculated ADC values from tumoral core and specific relative metabolite ratios acquired by MR spectroscopy added more information to MR imaging in the differentiation and grading of brain tumors and were more useful together than each alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12591638      PMCID: PMC7974143     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  48 in total

1.  MR diffusion imaging of human intracranial tumours.

Authors:  K Krabbe; P Gideon; P Wagn; U Hansen; C Thomsen; F Madsen
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Increased choline signal coinciding with malignant degeneration of cerebral gliomas: a serial proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging study.

Authors:  G Tedeschi; N Lundbom; R Raman; S Bonavita; J H Duyn; J R Alger; G Di Chiro
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 3.  Clinical applications of proton MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  M Castillo; L Kwock; S K Mukherji
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Role of diffusion-weighted echo-planar MRI in distinguishing between brain brain abscess and tumour: a preliminary report.

Authors:  K Noguchi; N Watanabe; T Nagayoshi; T Kanazawa; S Toyoshima; M Shimizu; H Seto
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Preoperative proton MR spectroscopic imaging of brain tumors: correlation with histopathologic analysis of resection specimens.

Authors:  C Dowling; A W Bollen; S M Noworolski; M W McDermott; N M Barbaro; M R Day; R G Henry; S M Chang; W P Dillon; S J Nelson; D B Vigneron
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Proton MR spectroscopy and preoperative diagnostic accuracy: an evaluation of intracranial mass lesions characterized by stereotactic biopsy findings.

Authors:  I M Burtscher; G Skagerberg; B Geijer; E Englund; F Ståhlberg; S Holtås
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Inflammatory granulomas: evaluation with proton MRS.

Authors:  R Jayasundar; V P Singh; P Raghunathan; K Jain; A K Banerji
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Quantitative diffusion MR imaging of cerebral tumor and edema.

Authors:  M Eis; T Els; M Hoehn-Berlage; K A Hossmann
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien)       Date:  1994

9.  Mapping of brain tumor metabolites with proton MR spectroscopic imaging: clinical relevance.

Authors:  M J Fulham; A Bizzi; M J Dietz; H H Shih; R Raman; G S Sobering; J A Frank; A J Dwyer; J R Alger; G Di Chiro
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  1H MR spectroscopy in patients with metastatic brain tumors: a multicenter study.

Authors:  P E Sijens; M V Knopp; A Brunetti; K Wicklow; B Alfano; P Bachert; J A Sanders; A E Stillman; H Kett; R Sauter
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  63 in total

Review 1.  Methodology of diffusion-weighted, diffusion tensor and magnetisation transfer imaging.

Authors:  S J Price; D J Tozer; J H Gillard
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Diffusion kurtosis as an in vivo imaging marker for reactive astrogliosis in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Jiachen Zhuo; Su Xu; Julie L Proctor; Roger J Mullins; Jonathan Z Simon; Gary Fiskum; Rao P Gullapalli
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Multiparametric 3T MR approach to the assessment of cerebral gliomas: tumor extent and malignancy.

Authors:  Alfonso Di Costanzo; Tommaso Scarabino; Francesca Trojsi; Giuseppe M Giannatempo; Teresa Popolizio; Domenico Catapano; Simona Bonavita; Nicola Maggialetti; Michela Tosetti; Ugo Salvolini; Vincenzo A d'Angelo; Giocchino Tedeschi
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-06-03       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  High b-value diffusion (b = 3000 s/mm2) MR imaging in cerebral gliomas at 3T: visual and quantitative comparisons with b = 1000 s/mm2.

Authors:  H S Seo; K-H Chang; D G Na; B J Kwon; D H Lee
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Orbital masses: the usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging in lesion categorization.

Authors:  Z Fatima; T Ichikawa; K Ishigame; U Motosugi; A B Waqar; M Hori; H Iijima; T Araki
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.649

6.  Proton MR spectroscopy of cerebral gliomas at 3 T: spatial heterogeneity, and tumour grade and extent.

Authors:  Alfonso Di Costanzo; Tommaso Scarabino; Francesca Trojsi; Teresa Popolizio; Domenico Catapano; Giuseppe M Giannatempo; Simona Bonavita; Maurizio Portaluri; Michela Tosetti; Vincenzo A d'Angelo; Ugo Salvolini; Gioacchino Tedeschi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Imaging of cerebellopontine angle lesions: an update. Part 2: intra-axial lesions, skull base lesions that may invade the CPA region, and non-enhancing extra-axial lesions.

Authors:  Fabrice Bonneville; Julien Savatovsky; Jacques Chiras
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  How Can New Imaging Modalities Help in the Practice of Radiology?

Authors:  Berhan Pirimoglu; Recep Sade; Hayri Ogul; Mecit Kantarci; Suat Eren; Akın Levent
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2016-10

9.  Dural based mass: malignant or benign.

Authors:  Kurt Scherer; John Johnston; Mukta Panda
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2009-11-01

10.  The correlation between 1H MRS choline concentrations and MR diffusion trace values in human brain tumors.

Authors:  Dita Wagnerova; Filip Jiru; Monika Dezortova; Lydie Vargova; Eva Sykova; Milan Hajek
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.