Literature DB >> 17340100

Imaging readouts as biomarkers or surrogate parameters for the assessment of therapeutic interventions.

Markus Rudin1.   

Abstract

Surrogate markers and biomarkers based on imaging readouts providing predictive information on clinical outcome are of increasing importance in the preclinical and clinical evaluation of novel therapies. They are primarily used in studies designed to establish evidence that the therapeutic principle is valid in a representative patient population or in an individual. A critical step in the development of (imaging) surrogates is validation: correlation with established clinical endpoints must be demonstrated. Biomarkers must not fulfill such stringent validation criteria; however, they should provide insight into mechanistic aspects of the therapeutic intervention (proof-of-mechanism) or document therapy efficacy with prognostic quality with regard to the long-term clinical outcome (proof of concept). Currently used imaging biomarkers provide structural, physiological and metabolic information. Novel imaging approaches annotate structure with molecular signatures that are tightly linked to the pathophysiology or to the therapeutic principle. These cellular and molecular imaging methods yield information on drug biodistribution, receptor expression and occupancy, and/or intra- and intercellular signaling. The design of novel target-specific imaging probes is closely related to the development of the therapeutic agents and should be considered early in the discovery phase. Significant technical and regulatory hurdles have to be overcome to foster the use of imaging biomarkers for clinical drug evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17340100     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0619-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  88 in total

1.  3'-18F-fluoro-3'-deoxy-L-thymidine: a new tracer for staging metastatic melanoma?

Authors:  David C P Cobben; Piet L Jager; Philip H Elsinga; Bram Maas; Albert J H Suurmeijer; Harald J Hoekstra
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  Metabonomics: a platform for studying drug toxicity and gene function.

Authors:  Jeremy K Nicholson; John Connelly; John C Lindon; Elaine Holmes
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Synthesis and evaluation of 18F-labeled choline as an oncologic tracer for positron emission tomography: initial findings in prostate cancer.

Authors:  T R DeGrado; R E Coleman; S Wang; S W Baldwin; M D Orr; C N Robertson; T J Polascik; D T Price
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Imaging of nicotinic and muscarinic receptors in Alzheimer's disease: effect of tacrine treatment.

Authors:  A Nordberg; H Lundqvist; P Hartvig; J Andersson; M Johansson; E Hellstrŏm-Lindahi; B Långström
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.959

5.  Recovery of function in cytoprotected cerebral cortex in rat stroke model assessed by functional MRI.

Authors:  Andre Sauter; Torsten Reese; Robert Pórszász; Diana Baumann; Martin Rausch; Markus Rudin
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 6.  Peptide receptor imaging and therapy.

Authors:  D Kwekkeboom; E P Krenning; M de Jong
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  Positron emission tomography microdosing: a new concept with application in tracer and early clinical drug development.

Authors:  Mats Bergström; Anders Grahnén; Bengt Långström
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-08-22       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 8.  The role of labeled Annexin A5 in imaging of programmed cell death. From animal to clinical imaging.

Authors:  B L J H Kietselaer; L Hofstra; E A W Dumont; C P M Reutelingsperger; G A K Heidendal
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-12

9.  Detection of amyloid plaques in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jiangyang Zhang; Paul Yarowsky; Marcia N Gordon; Giovanni Di Carlo; Sanjay Munireddy; Peter C M van Zijl; Susumu Mori
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in clinical oncology: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Imaging biomarkers: from research to patient care--a shift in view.

Authors:  Giovanni Lucignani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Hepatic neuroendocrine tumour: Apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential marker of prognosis associated with tumour grade and overall survival.

Authors:  Ji Hye Min; Tae Wook Kang; Young Kon Kim; Seong Hyun Kim; Kyung Sook Shin; Jeong Eun Lee; Sang Yun Ha; Insuk Sohn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Functional and molecular image guidance in radiotherapy treatment planning optimization.

Authors:  Shiva K Das; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.934

4.  Correlation of ADC value with pathologic indexes in colorectal tumor homografts in Balb/c mouse.

Authors:  Xiaojun Li; Hongnan Jiang; Jinliang Niu; Ying Zheng
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani; Guoying Liu; Dow Mu Koh; Thomas L Chenevert; Harriet C Thoeny; Taro Takahara; Andrew Dzik-Jurasz; Brian D Ross; Marc Van Cauteren; David Collins; Dima A Hammoud; Gordon J S Rustin; Bachir Taouli; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.715

6.  Early changes in the apparent diffusion coefficient and MMP-9 expression of a cervical carcinoma U14 allograft model following irradiation.

Authors:  Yecai Huang; Jianming Huang; Mei Feng; Jing Ren; Kun Mi; Jia Cheng; Bing Song; Jinyi Lang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Biomarker Discovery and Validation: Statistical Considerations.

Authors:  Fang-Shu Ou; Stefan Michiels; Yu Shyr; Alex A Adjei; Ann L Oberg
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 15.609

8.  Evaluation of metabolomic changes as a biomarker of chondrogenic differentiation in 3D-cultured human mesenchymal stem cells using proton (1H) nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Moo-Young Jang; Song-I Chun; Chi-Woong Mun; Kwan Soo Hong; Jung-Woog Shin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Strategies for modern biomarker and drug development in oncology.

Authors:  Alan D Smith; Desam Roda; Timothy A Yap
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 17.388

10.  Feasibility of 4D perfusion CT imaging for the assessment of liver treatment response following SBRT and sorafenib.

Authors:  Catherine Coolens; Brandon Driscoll; Joanne Moseley; Kristy K Brock; Laura A Dawson
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.