Literature DB >> 25231336

Molecular characterization of common fragile sites as a strategy to discover cancer susceptibility genes.

Larissa Savelyeva1, Lena M Brueckner.   

Abstract

The cytogenetic hypothesis that common fragile sites (cFSs) are hotspots of cancer breakpoints is increasingly supported by recent data from whole-genome profiles of different cancers. cFSs are components of the normal chromosome structure that are particularly prone to breakage under conditions of replication stress. In recent years, cFSs have become of increasing interest in cancer research, as they not only appear to be frequent targets of genomic alterations in progressive tumors, but also already in precancerous lesions. Despite growing evidence of their importance in disease development, most cFSs have not been investigated at the molecular level and most cFS genes have not been identified. In this review, we summarize the current data on molecularly characterized cFSs, their genetic and epigenetic characteristics, and put emphasis on less-studied cFS genes as potential contributors to cancer development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25231336     DOI: 10.1007/s00018-014-1723-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci        ISSN: 1420-682X            Impact factor:   9.261


  113 in total

1.  SMAD5 gene expression, rearrangements, copy number, and amplification at fragile site FRA5C in human hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Drazen B Zimonjic; Marian E Durkin; Catherine L Keck-Waggoner; Sang-Won Park; Snorri S Thorgeirsson; Nicholas C Popescu
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  Collisions between replication and transcription complexes cause common fragile site instability at the longest human genes.

Authors:  Anne Helmrich; Monica Ballarino; Laszlo Tora
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Common fragile site FRA11G and rare fragile site FRA11B at 11q23.3 encompass distinct genomic regions.

Authors:  Anne Fechter; Isabel Buettel; Elisabeth Kuehnel; Larissa Savelyeva; Manfred Schwab
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  Regulation of cancer cell proliferation by caveolin-2 down-regulation and re-expression.

Authors:  Sangho Lee; Hayeong Kwon; Kyuho Jeong; Yunbae Pak
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 5.650

5.  Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and genomic instability in human precancerous lesions.

Authors:  Vassilis G Gorgoulis; Leandros-Vassilios F Vassiliou; Panagiotis Karakaidos; Panayotis Zacharatos; Athanassios Kotsinas; Triantafillos Liloglou; Monica Venere; Richard A Ditullio; Nikolaos G Kastrinakis; Brynn Levy; Dimitris Kletsas; Akihiro Yoneta; Meenhard Herlyn; Christos Kittas; Thanos D Halazonetis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  FRA7G extends over a broad region: coincidence of human endogenous retroviral sequences (HERV-H) and small polydispersed circular DNAs (spcDNA) and fragile sites.

Authors:  H Huang; J Qian; J Proffit; K Wilber; R Jenkins; D I Smith
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1998-05-07       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Stably transfected common fragile site sequences exhibit instability at ectopic sites.

Authors:  Ryan L Ragland; Michael W Glynn; Martin F Arlt; Thomas W Glover
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Common fragile site profiling in epithelial and erythroid cells reveals that most recurrent cancer deletions lie in fragile sites hosting large genes.

Authors:  Benoît Le Tallec; Gaël Armel Millot; Marion Esther Blin; Olivier Brison; Bernard Dutrillaux; Michelle Debatisse
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 9.  Common fragile sites: genomic hotspots of DNA damage and carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Ke Ma; Li Qiu; Kristin Mrasek; Jun Zhang; Thomas Liehr; Luciana Gonçalves Quintana; Zheng Li
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 6.208

10.  Somatic copy number changes in DPYD are associated with lower risk of recurrence in triple-negative breast cancers.

Authors:  E Gross; C Meul; S Raab; C Propping; S Avril; M Aubele; A Gkazepis; T Schuster; N Grebenchtchikov; M Schmitt; M Kiechle; J Meijer; R Vijzelaar; A Meindl; A B P van Kuilenburg
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Fragility Extraordinaire: Unsolved Mysteries of Chromosome Fragile Sites.

Authors:  Wenyi Feng; Arijita Chakraborty
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Replication Stress Induces Global Chromosome Breakage in the Fragile X Genome.

Authors:  Arijita Chakraborty; Piroon Jenjaroenpun; Jing Li; Sami El Hilali; Andrew McCulley; Brian Haarer; Elizabeth A Hoffman; Aimee Belak; Audrey Thorland; Heidi Hehnly; Carl L Schildkraut; Chun-Long Chen; Vladimir A Kuznetsov; Wenyi Feng
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 9.423

3.  DNA secondary structure at chromosomal fragile sites in human disease.

Authors:  Ryan G Thys; Christine E Lehman; Levi C T Pierce; Yuh-Hwa Wang
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.236

4.  TES inhibits colorectal cancer progression through activation of p38.

Authors:  Huili Li; Kun Huang; Lu Gao; Lixia Wang; Yanfeng Niu; Hongli Liu; Zheng Wang; Lin Wang; Guobin Wang; Jiliang Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-07-19

Review 5.  Potential biomarkers of DNA replication stress in cancer.

Authors:  Liqun Ren; Long Chen; Wei Wu; Lorenza Garribba; Huanna Tian; Zihui Liu; Ivan Vogel; Chunhui Li; Ian D Hickson; Ying Liu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-06

Review 6.  Advancing genomic technologies and clinical awareness accelerates discovery of disease-associated tandem repeat sequences.

Authors:  Terence Gall-Duncan; Nozomu Sato; Ryan K C Yuen; Christopher E Pearson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 9.438

7.  Long Neural Genes Harbor Recurrent DNA Break Clusters in Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells.

Authors:  Pei-Chi Wei; Amelia N Chang; Jennifer Kao; Zhou Du; Robin M Meyers; Frederick W Alt; Bjoern Schwer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  WWOX modulates the ATR-mediated DNA damage checkpoint response.

Authors:  Mohammad Abu-Odeh; Nyla A Hereema; Rami I Aqeilan
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-01-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.