Literature DB >> 23911288

Common fragile site profiling in epithelial and erythroid cells reveals that most recurrent cancer deletions lie in fragile sites hosting large genes.

Benoît Le Tallec1, Gaël Armel Millot, Marion Esther Blin, Olivier Brison, Bernard Dutrillaux, Michelle Debatisse.   

Abstract

Cancer genomes exhibit numerous deletions, some of which inactivate tumor suppressor genes and/or correspond to unstable genomic regions, notably common fragile sites (CFSs). However, 70%-80% of recurrent deletions cataloged in tumors remain unexplained. Recent findings that CFS setting is cell-type dependent prompted us to reevaluate the contribution of CFS to cancer deletions. By combining extensive CFS molecular mapping and a comprehensive analysis of CFS features, we show that the pool of CFSs for all human cell types consists of chromosome regions with genes over 300 kb long, and different subsets of these loci are committed to fragility in different cell types. Interestingly, we find that transcription of large genes does not dictate CFS fragility. We further demonstrate that, like CFSs, cancer deletions are significantly enriched in genes over 300 kb long. We now provide evidence that over 50% of recurrent cancer deletions originate from CFSs associated with large genes.
Copyright © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23911288     DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Rep            Impact factor:   9.423


  91 in total

Review 1.  DNA replication stress: from molecular mechanisms to human disease.

Authors:  Sergio Muñoz; Juan Méndez
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Oncogenes create a unique landscape of fragile sites.

Authors:  Karin Miron; Tamar Golan-Lev; Raz Dvir; Eyal Ben-David; Batsheva Kerem
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 3.  The role of fork stalling and DNA structures in causing chromosome fragility.

Authors:  Simran Kaushal; Catherine H Freudenreich
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  Defective endomitosis during megakaryopoiesis leads to thrombocytopenia in Fanca-/- mice.

Authors:  Patrycja Pawlikowska; Pierre Fouchet; William Vainchenker; Filippo Rosselli; Valeria Naim
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  Behavior of replication origins in Eukaryota - spatio-temporal dynamics of licensing and firing.

Authors:  Marcelina W Musiałek; Dorota Rybaczek
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 6.  The impact of replication stress on replication dynamics and DNA damage in vertebrate cells.

Authors:  Hervé Técher; Stéphane Koundrioukoff; Alain Nicolas; Michelle Debatisse
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 7.  Transcription-replication conflicts at chromosomal fragile sites-consequences in M phase and beyond.

Authors:  Vibe H Oestergaard; Michael Lisby
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 8.  Replication Stress: An Achilles' Heel of Glioma Cancer Stem-like Cells.

Authors:  Meredith A Morgan; Christine E Canman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 9.  Interplay between genetic and epigenetic factors governs common fragile site instability in cancer.

Authors:  Efrat Ozeri-Galai; Michal Tur-Sinai; Assaf C Bester; Batsheva Kerem
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 10.  Causes and consequences of replication stress.

Authors:  Michelle K Zeman; Karlene A Cimprich
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 28.824

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.