Literature DB >> 18615677

Stably transfected common fragile site sequences exhibit instability at ectopic sites.

Ryan L Ragland1, Michael W Glynn, Martin F Arlt, Thomas W Glover.   

Abstract

Common fragile sites (CFSs) are loci that are especially prone to forming gaps and breaks on metaphase chromosomes under conditions of replication stress. Although much has been learned about the cellular responses to gaps and breaks at CFSs, less is known about what makes these sites inherently unstable. CFS sequences are highly conserved in mammalian evolution and contain a number of sequence motifs that are hypothesized to contribute to their instability. To examine the role of CFS sequences in chromosome breakage, we stably transfected two BACs containing FRA3B sequences and two nonCFS control BACs containing similar sequence content into HCT116 cells and isolated cell clones with BACs integrated at ectopic sites. Integrated BACs were present at just a few to several hundred contiguous copies. Cell clones containing integrated FRA3B BACs showed a significant, three to sevenfold increase in aphidicolin-induced gaps and breaks at the integration site as compared to control BACs. Furthermore, many FRA3B integration sites displayed additional chromosome rearrangements associated with CFS instability. Clones were examined for replication timing and it was found that the integrated FRA3B sequences were not dependent on late replication for their fragility. This is the first direct evidence in human cells that introduction of CFS sequences into ectopic nonfragile loci is sufficient to recapitulate the instability found at CFSs. These data support the hypothesis that sequences at CFSs are inherently unstable, and are a major factor in the formation of replication stress induced gaps and breaks at CFSs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18615677     DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer        ISSN: 1045-2257            Impact factor:   5.006


  14 in total

1.  Genomic rearrangements at the FRA2H common fragile site frequently involve non-homologous recombination events across LTR and L1(LINE) repeats.

Authors:  Lena M Brueckner; Evgeny Sagulenko; Elisa M Hess; Diana Zheglo; Anne Blumrich; Manfred Schwab; Larissa Savelyeva
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Replication fork recovery and regulation of common fragile sites stability.

Authors:  Annapaola Franchitto; Pietro Pichierri
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 3.  Molecular characterization of common fragile sites as a strategy to discover cancer susceptibility genes.

Authors:  Larissa Savelyeva; Lena M Brueckner
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Allelic imbalance and abnormal expression of FHIT in endemic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: association with clinicopathological features.

Authors:  Yan Fei Deng; Dong Ni Zhou; Yong De Lu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Mechanism of replicative DNA polymerase delta pausing and a potential role for DNA polymerase kappa in common fragile site replication.

Authors:  Erin Walsh; Xiaoxiao Wang; Marietta Y Lee; Kristin A Eckert
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  A TRF1-controlled common fragile site containing interstitial telomeric sequences.

Authors:  Nazario Bosco; Titia de Lange
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Plant 45S rDNA clusters are fragile sites and their instability is associated with epigenetic alterations.

Authors:  Min Huang; Hui Li; Lu Zhang; Fei Gao; Pu Wang; Yong Hu; Shihan Yan; Lin Zhao; Qi Zhang; Junjun Tan; Xincheng Liu; Shibin He; Lijia Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  DNA structure and the Werner protein modulate human DNA polymerase delta-dependent replication dynamics within the common fragile site FRA16D.

Authors:  Sandeep N Shah; Patricia L Opresko; Xiao Meng; Marietta Y W T Lee; Kristin A Eckert
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Secondary structure formation and DNA instability at fragile site FRA16B.

Authors:  Allison A Burrow; Allison Marullo; Lindsay R Holder; Yuh-Hwa Wang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 10.  Common fragile sites: genomic hotspots of DNA damage and carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Ke Ma; Li Qiu; Kristin Mrasek; Jun Zhang; Thomas Liehr; Luciana Gonçalves Quintana; Zheng Li
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 6.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.